Radiological findings of abnormalities associated with congenital Zika virus infection: conclusions from World Radiology Day 2016

Resultados radiológicos de las anomalías asociadas con la infección congénita por el virus del Zika: conclusiones del Día Mundial de la Radiología del 2016

Achados radiológicos de anomalias associadas à infecção congênita por vírus zika: conclusões do Dia Internacional da Radiologia 2016

Kayiba Peggy Medlen Andrea Poretti Thierry A.G.M. Huisman Jonel Di Muro Priscilla Butler Paula Woletz Pablo Jiménez About the authors

ABSTRACT

In July 2015, Brazil reported an association between Zika virus infection and Guillain-Barré syndrome, and then in October 2015, between Zika and microcephaly. Most countries and territories in the Region of the Americas were later affected by the virus, creating a public health emergency.

Each year, the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), Regional Office of the World Health Organization commemorates World Radiology Day (WRD), which highlights the role of radiology in public health. In 2016, PAHO devoted its WRD efforts to the Zika infection. Experts and partners presented and discussed the various radiological findings of Zika infection, the crucial role of obstetric ultrasound in the screening and monitoring of abnormalities associated with confirmed Zika virus infection, and the appropriateness of utilizing other neuroimaging technologies to study brain abnormalities in neonates and infants with prenatal Zika virus infection. The conclusions of WRD 2016 recommend that upon confirmation, prenatal ultrasound be used as the main tool to investigate and monitor suspected cases, with subsequent multidisciplinary postnatal assessments that include neuropediatric clinical studies and relevant neuroimaging. Additionally, radiology technicians should be adequately trained and a quality assurance program should be implemented to ensure timely, safe, and accurate diagnosis.

Keywords
Zika virus; Zika virus infection, diagnostic imaging; microcephaly; neuroimaging; tomography, x-ray computed; magnetic resonance imaging; radiography; ultrasonography; Latin America; Caribbean Region; Americas

RESUMEN

En julio del 2015, Brasil informó una asociación entre la infección por el virus del Zika y el síndrome de Guillain-Barré y luego, en octubre 2015, entre la infección por el virus del Zika y la microcefalia. Posteriormente, la mayoría de los países y territorios de la Región de las Américas se vio afectada por el virus, lo que dio lugar a una emergencia de salud pública. Todos los años, la Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS), la Oficina Regional de la Organización Mundial de la Salud, conmemora el Día Mundial de la Radiología, en el que se reconoce la importancia de la radiología en la salud pública. En el 2016, la OPS dedicó las actividades en el marco del Día Mundial de la Radiología a la infección por el virus del Zika. Diversos expertos y asociados presentaron los distintos signos radiográficos de la infección por el virus del Zika, y debatieron sobre esto, así como sobre el papel fundamental que desempeñan las ecografías obstétricas en el tamizaje y el seguimiento de las anomalías asociadas con la infección por el virus del Zika confirmada, y sobre la pertinencia de utilizar técnicas de neurodiagnóstico por imágenes para estudiar las anomalías cerebrales en recién nacidos y lactantes con infección por el virus del Zika prenatal. Las conclusiones del Día Mundial de la Radiología del 2016 recomiendan que, tras la confirmación de la infección, se utilicen las ecografías prenatales como herramienta principal para investigar y hacer un seguimiento de los casos presuntos, seguida por una evaluación posnatal multidisciplinaria en la que se incluyan estudios clínicos neuropediátricos y las técnicas de neurodiagnóstico por imágenes pertinentes. Además, se debe capacitar adecuadamente a los técnicos de radiología y se debe ejecutar un programa de garantía de la calidad para asegurar el diagnóstico oportuno, seguro y certero.

Palabras clave
Virus Zika; infección por el virus Zika, diagnóstico por imagen; microcephalia; neuroimagen; tomografía computarizada por rayos x; imagen por resonancia magnética; ultrasonografía; Latino América; Región del Caribe; Américas

RESUMO

Em julho de 2015, o Brasil informou existir associação entre a infecção por vírus zika e síndrome de Guillain-Barré e, em outubro do mesmo ano, entre o vírus zika e microcefalia. A maioria de países e territórios na Região das Américas foi subsequentemente afetada pelo vírus, constituindo emergência de saúde pública. Todos os anos, a Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde (OPAS), Escritório Regional da Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) comemora o Dia Internacional da Radiologia destacando o papel da radiologia em saúde pública. Em 2016, a OPAS dedicou este dia à infecção por vírus zika. Especialistas e parceiros apresentaram e debateram os diversos achados radiológicos na infecção por vírus zika, o papel fundamental do exame de ultrassom obstétrico na detecção precoce e monitoramento de anomalias associadas à infecção confirmada e quando convém usar outras técnicas de neuroimagem para estudar as anomalias cerebrais nos recém-nascidos e lactentes com infecção pré-natal. O painel do Dia Internacional da Radiologia 2016 recomenda que, com a confirmação da infecção, o ultrassom pré-natal seja o principal método usado para investigar e monitorar os casos suspeitos, com subsequente avaliação pós-natal multidisciplinar incluindo estudos clínicos neuropediátricos e exames de neuroimagem. Além disso, o pessoal técnico em radiologia deve ser adequadamente capacitado e implantado um programa de garantia da qualidade para assegurar o diagnóstico preciso, seguro e oportuno.

Palavras-chave
Zika virus; infecção pelo Zika virus, diagnóstico por imagem; microcephalia; neuroimagem; tomografia computadorizada por raios x radiografia; imagem por ressonância magnética; radiografía; ultrassonografia; Latino América; Região do Caribe; América

World Radiography Day is celebrated annually on November 8th to commemorate the discovery of x-radiation by Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen in 1895. For the Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO), World Radiology Day (WRD) is an opportunity to increase public awareness of the role that radiology plays in public health. On 9 November 2016, a panel of experts that included a neuroradiologist, a perinatologist, obstetrician-gynecologists, medical physicists, and a sonographer from the Region of the Americas gathered to discuss the crucial role of obstetric ultrasound in screening and monitoring confirmed Zika-related abnormalities. The group also covered the appropriateness of using other neuroimaging technologies, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to study brain abnormalities in neonates and infants with prenatal infection.

Zika virus (ZIKV) is an arbovirus of the Flaviviridae family that is usually transmitted by a mosquito. It was initially detected in a primate in 1947. As of 2015, a total of 48 countries and territories in the Americas have confirmed autochthonous, vector-borne transmission of Zika virus disease, and 20 of these have reported confirmed cases of congenital syndrome associated with Zika infection (11. Pan American Health Organization. Regional Zika epidemiological update. Available from: www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=11599&Itemid=41691&lang=en Accessed 1 December 2016.
www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_con...
). The virus spreads to humans primarily through infected Aedes species mosquitoes; in pregnant women, the unborn child is at risk of adverse outcomes, including brain abnormalities, such as microcephaly, and disrupted brain development, intracranial calcifications, and eye abnormalities (22. United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prenatal diagnosis of microcephaly. Available from: www.cdc.gov/zika/hc-providers/pregnant-women/prenatal-diagnosis-microcephaly.html Accessed 11 July 2017.
www.cdc.gov/zika/hc-providers/pregnant-w...
).

In October 2013, an outbreak of ZIKV was reported in French Polynesia, with some cases producing severe neurological complications (33. Besnard M, Lastère S, Teissier A, Cao-Lormeau VM, Musso D. Evidence of perinatal transmission of Zika virus, French Polynesia, December 2013 and February 2014. Euro Surveill. 2014;19(13):pii-20751.). In November 2015, the Ministry of Health of Brazil attributed the increased number of neonatal microcephaly cases in the country's northeastern area to congenital ZIKV infection. The rapid spread of the virus convinced WHO to announce ZIKV infection as a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern” in February 2016 (44. Schuler-Faccini L, Ribeiro EM, Feitosa IM, Horovitz DG, Cavalcanti DP, Pessoa A, et al. Possible association between Zika virus infection and microcephaly, Brazil, 2015. MMWR 2016;65:59–62.).

This report presents (a) neurologic findings associated with Zika infection; (b) neuroimaging modalities used in diagnosing cranial and intracranial abnormalities associated with intrauterine ZIKV infection; (c) radiation exposure from medical imaging; and (d) neuroimaging in areas with limited resources.

DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Neurologic findings associated with Zika infection

Familiarity with the neurologic and neuroimaging findings of congenital ZIKV infection is crucial to making an early diagnosis when evaluating the fetuses and newborns of residents and travelers to areas where Zika is endemic. The risks inherent in the abnormal development of the brain in fetuses of infected mothers were initially detected in Brazil with the description of microcephaly cases and other pre- and postnatal findings. According to PAHO, 22 countries have confirmed cases of Congenital Syndrome associated with Zika Virus Infection (CASaZVI); (55. Pan American Health Organization. Zika - epidemiological update. Available from: www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&id-=11599&Itemid=41691Accessed 29 December 2016.
www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_con...
). In Venezuela, more than 200 000 suspected cases of Zika and 2 200 confirmed cases of Zika infection have been reported, and possible microcephaly cases have been documented (66. Pan American Health Organization, World Health Organization. Venezuela - Zika epidemiological report. Washington, DC: PAHO/WHO; 2016.).

The Zika virus is thought to disrupt the development of brain structures that would otherwise have developed normally. For example, neuronal and glial proliferation occurs before the 10th week of gestation. If the disruption occurs during this time, microcephaly, intracranial parenchymal calcifications (mostly located at the level of the cortico-medullary junction), and ventriculomegaly may develop. Disruption during the period of neuronal migration may result in the development of lissencephaly and heterotopia, while later disruption may be associated with polymicrogyria and focal cortical dysplasia (77. Moore CA, Staples JE, Dobyns WB, Pessoa A, Ventura CV, da Fonseca EB, et al. Characterizing the pattern of anomalies in congenital Zika syndrome for pediatric clinicians. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(3):288-95. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3982
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2...
). Additional neurologic findings associated with congenital ZIKV infection include ventriculomegaly, enlarged extra-axial cerebrospinal fluid spaces, cerebellar and brainstem hypoplasia, and white matter signal changes (most likely due to dysmyelination and resulting in secondary thinning of the corpus callosum). Arthrogryposis, ocular abnormalities, and redundant scalp skin have also been noted in some cases (77. Moore CA, Staples JE, Dobyns WB, Pessoa A, Ventura CV, da Fonseca EB, et al. Characterizing the pattern of anomalies in congenital Zika syndrome for pediatric clinicians. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(3):288-95. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3982
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2...
, 88. De Fatima Vasco Aragao M, Van der Linden V, Brainer-Lima AM, Coeli RR, Rocha MA, Sobral da Silva P, et al. Clinical features and neuroimaging (CT and MRI) findings in presumed Zika virus related congenital infection and microcephaly: retrospective case series study. BMJ. 2016;353:i1901.).

The present findings describe autochthonous cases of epidemiological suspicion that according to literature fit with CSaZVI, i.e., microcephaly, calcifications (mostly at the level of the cortico-medullary junction, but also, basal, ocular), ventriculomegaly, dysgenesis of corpus callosum, simplified gyral pattern, cerebellar hypoplasia, enlarged cisterna magna, and early arthrogryposis (99. Hazin AN, Poretti A, Turchi Martelli CM, Cruz DD, Tenorio M, van der Linden A, et al. Microcephaly Epidemic Research Group. Computed tomographic findings in microcephaly associated with Zika virus. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(22):2193-5.). Prenatal confirmation and ultrasound monitoring of suspected cases of CSaZVI are recommended, with subsequent multidisciplinary postnatal assessment that includes neuropediatric clinical studies, relevant neuroimaging (transfontanel ultrasonography, computed tomography [CT], and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), and evoked potentials, among others. For appropriate pre- and postnatal advice, the main guidelines for patient management and timely identification of CSaZVI cases include minimizing exposure of pregnant women and proper handling of vectors, along with timely investigation of suspected cases by epidemiology, clinical, and paraclinical services and the correct use of perinatal ultrasound (1010. Brasil P, Pereira, JP, Moreira, E, Ribeiro Nogueira, RM, Damasceno, L, Wakimoto M, et al. Zika virus infection in pregnant women in Rio de Janeiro. New Engl J Med. 2016;375:2321-34. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602412
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1602412...
).

Diagnosis of intrauterine Zika virus infection

Several neuroimaging modalities are available to diagnose cranial and intracranial abnormalities associated with intrauterine ZIKV infection (1111. Mohan S, Rogan EA, Batty R, Raghavan A, Whitby EH, Hart AR, et al. CT of the neonatal head. Clin Radiol. 2013;68:1155-66.1313. Orman G, Benson JE, Kweldam CF, Bosemani T, Tekes A, de Jong MR, et al. Neonatal head ultrasonography today: a powerful imaging tool. J Neuroimag. 2015;25(1):31-55.). As shown in Table 1, prenatal ultrasound is the main tool for investigating abnormal findings in the development of the central nervous system (CNS) of the fetus (1414. Pan American Health Organization. Provisional considerations for the care of pregnant women in settings with high Zika virus circulation: Document for health care professionals. Washington, DC: PAHO; 2016. Available from: http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/28231 Accessed 10 July 2017.
http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/handle/123456...
). The International Society for Ultrasound in Obstetric and Gynecologic (London, United Kingdom) in its publication, Interim Guidance on Ultrasound for Zika Infection in Pregnancy (1515. Papageorghiou AT, Thilaganathan B, Bilardo CM, Ngu A, Malinger G, Herrera M, et al. ISUOG Interim Guidance on ultrasound for Zika virus infection in pregnancy: information for healthcare professionals. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47:530–2.), recommends:

  • Accurate assessment of gestational age.

  • Baseline ultrasound scan, including biometry and assessment of fetal anatomy.

  • Measurement of the lateral ventricles and transcerebellar diameter.

  • Assessment of intracranial anatomy.

    1. Fetal head circumference (HC) of 2 standard deviations below the expected mean for gestational age, intracranial calcifications, irregularly-shaped ventricular margins, ventriculomegaly, increased periventricular echogenicity, intraventricular adhesions, calcifications, callosal or vermian dysgenesis, small transcerebellar diameter, enlarged cisterna magna and/or increased amount of cerebrospinal fluid around the brain.

    2. Repeat every 4 – 6 weeks if local resources permit.

TABLE 1
Advantages and disadvantages of radiology technologies used to screen and monitor abnormalities associated with Zika virus infection, 2017

Some fetal intracerebral findings, such as the presence of calcifications, periventricular or intraventricular margins, intraventricular echogenicities, and irregularly-shaped lateral ventricles may go undetected prior to 14 weeks of gestational age.

Radiation exposure from medical imaging

X-rays, CT computed tomography, mammography, nuclear medicine, and radiation oncology procedures have significantly improved the health of people worldwide. These procedures are used to detect, diagnose, and treat diseases. However, as with any medical procedure, there are risks; consequently, these procedures must be used wisely and cautiously. Radiation exposure from medical imaging is the largest contributor to population exposure, greater than any other artificial source of radiation. In spite of this, the probability that radiation exposure from a diagnostic imaging procedure will cause cancer is very low.

It is important to employ two basic radiation protection concepts for all patients (1616. European Commission, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Atomic Energy Agency, International Labor Organization, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Pan American Health Organization, United Nations Environment Program, World Health Organization. Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: international basic safety standards. Vienna: IAEA; 2014. Available from: www.pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1578_web-57265295.pdf Accessed 11 July 2017.
www.pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/P...
). The first is “justification.” This means performing an examination only when clinically indicated, using the correct technology to minimize inappropriate use, and following relevant national or international referral guidelines. One such set of guidelines is the American College of Radiology's (Reston, Virginia, United States) Appropriateness Criteria,® which ranks procedure types in order of appropriateness, along with Relative Radiation Levels; additionally, its women's topics section includes an Assessment of Fetal Well-Being (1717. American College of Radiology. Appropriateness criteria. Available from: https://acsearch.acr.org/list Accessed on 11 July 2017.
https://acsearch.acr.org/list...
). To avoid unnecessary radiation exposure to the patient, both the referring and interpreting physicians must have a thorough understanding of the exam type required and its appropriateness. It is crucial that medical professionals be aware of the relative radiation levels of the various imaging technologies.

The second concept is “optimization.” Optimization ensures that the correct equipment is used and techniques (and radiation exposure) are adjusted based on patient size or body habitus. This is important for pediatric imaging, especially for CT. Optimization also includes minimizing repeats, awareness of estimated patient dose, utilizing appropriate shielding, and ensuring operators are well trained and qualified to perform the imaging. Since the developing fetus is more sensitive to radiation exposure, special considerations should be given to pregnant patients, including whether to use ultrasound or MRI. The magnitude and types of risks to the fetus depend on the gestational age and the dose. Risks are generally low, but may include lethality, developmental abnormities, central nervous system effects, or cancer.

There are radiation risks throughout pregnancy that are related to pregnancy stage and dose. Radiation risks are greater during organogenesis and in the early fetal period; risks are somewhat less in the second trimester; and least in the third trimester. Malformations have a threshold of 100 – 200 mGy or higher and are typically associated with central nervous system problems. During 8 – 25 weeks post-conception, the central nervous system is particularly sensitive to radiation. Fetal doses in excess of 100 mGy can result in some reduction of intelligence quotient. Fetal doses in the range of 1 000 mGy can result in severe mental retardation and microcephaly, particularly during weeks 8 – 15, and to a lesser extent, at weeks 16 – 25. Radiation has been shown to increase the risk for leukemia and many types of cancer in adults and children. The relative cancer risk may be as high as 1.4 (40% increase over normal incidence) due to a fetal dose of 10 mGy. For an individual exposed in utero to 10 mGy, the absolute risk of cancer at 0 – 15 years of age is about 1 excess cancer death per 1 700 (1818. International Commission of Radiological Protection. Pregnancy and medical radiation. ICRP Publication 84. Ann ICRP. 2000;30(1). Available from: www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%2084 Accessed on 11 July 2017.
www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20P...
, 1919. International Commission of Radiological Protection. Biological effects after prenatal irradiation (embryo and fetus). ICRP Publication 90. Ann ICRP. 2013;33(1-2). Available from: www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=-ICRP%20Publication%2090 Accessed 11 July 2017.
www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=-ICRP%20...
).

It is also important to remember that there are similar risks to this population, even when no radiation from medical imaging is involved. Prenatal doses from most properly-performed diagnostic procedures present no measurable increase in risk of prenatal death, malformation, or impairment of mental status over the background risks. In general, fetal doses of 100 mGy are not reached even with three pelvic CT scans or 20 conventional diagnostic X-ray examinations; however, with procedures using high-dose levels, fetal dose and potential risks should be estimated by qualified individuals (1818. International Commission of Radiological Protection. Pregnancy and medical radiation. ICRP Publication 84. Ann ICRP. 2000;30(1). Available from: www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%2084 Accessed on 11 July 2017.
www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20P...
2121. Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing and Radiation, National Research Council. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation Beir VII phase 2. 2006. Available from: http://nap.edu/11340 Accessed 11 July 2017.
http://nap.edu/11340...
).

Neuroimaging in areas with limited resources

Due to the limited access to some high end technologies, low income countries may face challenges in the screening and monitoring of abnormalities associated with confirmed Zika infection. However, basic X-rays and ultrasound examinations alone can be used to diagnose most diseases and conditions in areas of Latin America and the Caribbean when access to MRI or CT is limited.

Although ultrasound is safe, low cost, and portable, it is operator reliant and requires extensive knowledge for acquiring and interpreting images. Operators must be properly trained and have access to continuing education. Furthermore, imaging units may be outdated in developing countries and a thorough knowledge of the physics behind the technology is essential to produce optimal images in an efficient, safe, and cost-effective manner. Available resources should be used in an efficacious manner; for example, if the ultrasound unit fails to automatically calculate gestational age measurements, growth charts should be available for reference purposes. Ultrasound operators should adhere to established examination protocols, utilize consistent scan planes, demonstrate appropriate landmarks, and if local protocols are not available, obtain measurements as stipulated or set forth by accrediting bodies, such as the American College of Radiology or the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Moreover, educational resources should be made available, including didactic and hands-on training to strengthen the knowledge and skills of both experienced and new radiology professionals. If possible, collaboration or alliances should be established to allow remote consultation with experts.

Conclusion

Radiology plays an important role in the screening, diagnosis, and management of many diseases and conditions in Latin America and the Caribbean; however, it is often used poorly and ineffectively. Upon confirmation of Zika infection in a pregnant woman, prenatal ultrasound should be the main tool for investigating and monitoring the suspected ZIKV case, with subsequent multidisciplinary postnatal assessments, including neuropediatric clinical study and relevant neuroimaging. For this purpose, additional sonography training and telemedicine should be considered, especially in remote areas. Well-trained professionals should be operating the imaging devices, and interpreting the images. Moreover, these technologies should be utilized prudently and appropriately to prevent unnecessary radiation exposure, minimize cost, and provide accurate and timely diagnosis of Zikaassociated abnormalities.

  • Disclaimer: Authors hold sole responsibility for the views expressed in the manuscript, which may not necessarily reflect the opinion or policy of the RPSP/PAJPH and/or PAHO.

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Pan American Health Organization. Regional Zika epidemiological update. Available from: www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=11599&Itemid=41691&lang=en Accessed 1 December 2016.
    » www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=11599&Itemid=41691&lang=en
  • 2
    United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prenatal diagnosis of microcephaly. Available from: www.cdc.gov/zika/hc-providers/pregnant-women/prenatal-diagnosis-microcephaly.html Accessed 11 July 2017.
    » www.cdc.gov/zika/hc-providers/pregnant-women/prenatal-diagnosis-microcephaly.html
  • 3
    Besnard M, Lastère S, Teissier A, Cao-Lormeau VM, Musso D. Evidence of perinatal transmission of Zika virus, French Polynesia, December 2013 and February 2014. Euro Surveill. 2014;19(13):pii-20751.
  • 4
    Schuler-Faccini L, Ribeiro EM, Feitosa IM, Horovitz DG, Cavalcanti DP, Pessoa A, et al. Possible association between Zika virus infection and microcephaly, Brazil, 2015. MMWR 2016;65:59–62.
  • 5
    Pan American Health Organization. Zika - epidemiological update. Available from: www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&id-=11599&Itemid=41691Accessed 29 December 2016.
    » www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&id-=11599&Itemid=41691
  • 6
    Pan American Health Organization, World Health Organization. Venezuela - Zika epidemiological report. Washington, DC: PAHO/WHO; 2016.
  • 7
    Moore CA, Staples JE, Dobyns WB, Pessoa A, Ventura CV, da Fonseca EB, et al. Characterizing the pattern of anomalies in congenital Zika syndrome for pediatric clinicians. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(3):288-95. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3982
    » https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3982
  • 8
    De Fatima Vasco Aragao M, Van der Linden V, Brainer-Lima AM, Coeli RR, Rocha MA, Sobral da Silva P, et al. Clinical features and neuroimaging (CT and MRI) findings in presumed Zika virus related congenital infection and microcephaly: retrospective case series study. BMJ. 2016;353:i1901.
  • 9
    Hazin AN, Poretti A, Turchi Martelli CM, Cruz DD, Tenorio M, van der Linden A, et al. Microcephaly Epidemic Research Group. Computed tomographic findings in microcephaly associated with Zika virus. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(22):2193-5.
  • 10
    Brasil P, Pereira, JP, Moreira, E, Ribeiro Nogueira, RM, Damasceno, L, Wakimoto M, et al. Zika virus infection in pregnant women in Rio de Janeiro. New Engl J Med. 2016;375:2321-34. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602412
    » https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1602412
  • 11
    Mohan S, Rogan EA, Batty R, Raghavan A, Whitby EH, Hart AR, et al. CT of the neonatal head. Clin Radiol. 2013;68:1155-66.
  • 12
    Huisman TAGM, Tekes A. Advanced MR brain imaging. Why? Pediatr Radiol. 2008;38(suppl 3):415. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-008-0895-9
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0895-9
  • 13
    Orman G, Benson JE, Kweldam CF, Bosemani T, Tekes A, de Jong MR, et al. Neonatal head ultrasonography today: a powerful imaging tool. J Neuroimag. 2015;25(1):31-55.
  • 14
    Pan American Health Organization. Provisional considerations for the care of pregnant women in settings with high Zika virus circulation: Document for health care professionals. Washington, DC: PAHO; 2016. Available from: http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/28231 Accessed 10 July 2017.
    » http://iris.paho.org/xmlui/handle/123456789/28231
  • 15
    Papageorghiou AT, Thilaganathan B, Bilardo CM, Ngu A, Malinger G, Herrera M, et al. ISUOG Interim Guidance on ultrasound for Zika virus infection in pregnancy: information for healthcare professionals. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47:530–2.
  • 16
    European Commission, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Atomic Energy Agency, International Labor Organization, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Pan American Health Organization, United Nations Environment Program, World Health Organization. Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: international basic safety standards. Vienna: IAEA; 2014. Available from: www.pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1578_web-57265295.pdf Accessed 11 July 2017.
    » www.pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub1578_web-57265295.pdf
  • 17
    American College of Radiology. Appropriateness criteria. Available from: https://acsearch.acr.org/list Accessed on 11 July 2017.
    » https://acsearch.acr.org/list
  • 18
    International Commission of Radiological Protection. Pregnancy and medical radiation. ICRP Publication 84. Ann ICRP. 2000;30(1). Available from: www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%2084 Accessed on 11 July 2017.
    » www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=ICRP%20Publication%2084
  • 19
    International Commission of Radiological Protection. Biological effects after prenatal irradiation (embryo and fetus). ICRP Publication 90. Ann ICRP. 2013;33(1-2). Available from: www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=-ICRP%20Publication%2090 Accessed 11 July 2017.
    » www.icrp.org/publication.asp?id=-ICRP%20Publication%2090
  • 20
    American College of Radiology. Radiation dose to adults from common imaging examinations. Available from: www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/QualitySafety/Radiation%20Safety/Dose%20Reference%20Card.pdf Accessed 11 July 2017.
    » www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/QualitySafety/Radiation%20Safety/Dose%20Reference%20Card.pdf
  • 21
    Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing and Radiation, National Research Council. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation Beir VII phase 2. 2006. Available from: http://nap.edu/11340 Accessed 11 July 2017.
    » http://nap.edu/11340

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    12 Apr 2018

History

  • Received
    25 Jan 2017
  • Accepted
    05 June 2017
Organización Panamericana de la Salud Washington - Washington - United States
E-mail: contacto_rpsp@paho.org