SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.41 issue5Self-rated health among industrial workers in Southern BrazilPrevalence of intimate partner violence against women in regions of Brazil author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Page  

Revista de Saúde Pública

On-line version ISSN 1518-8787
Print version ISSN 0034-8910

Abstract

SARNO, Flávio  and  MONTEIRO, Carlos Augusto. Relative importance of body mass index and waist circumference for hypertension in adults. Rev. Saúde Pública [online]. 2007, vol.41, n.5, pp.788-796. ISSN 1518-8787.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102007000500013.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relative importance of Body Mass Index (BMI) and waist circumference for the determination of hypertension in adults. METHODS: Cross sectional analysis of a sample of employees (N=1,584), aged 18 to 64 years, from a private general hospital in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Data collection included the application of a structured questionnaire and blood pressure, weight, high, and waist circumference measurements. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure levels > 140/90 mmHg or reported use of anti-hypertensive medication. The relative importance of BMI and waist circumference was evaluated by calculating the attributable fraction of hypertension corresponding to each anthropometric indicator, employing both the usual cut-off points as well as cut-off points based on the observed distribution of the indicator in the population. In addition, an indicator combining simultaneously BMI and abdominal circumference values was also developed. RESULTS: Prevalence of hypertension was 18.9% (26.9% in men and 12.5% in women). In men, the fraction of hypertension attributable to BMI exceeded the fraction attributable to waist circumference based on the usual cut-off points for the indicators (56% vs. 48%, respectively) and also considering the quartiles of the observed distribution for these indicators (73% vs. 69%, respectively). In women, the fraction of hypertension attributable to waist circumference was slightly higher than the fraction attributable to BMI based on the usual cut off points for both indicators (44% vs. 41%), but the reverse was true when quartiles of the observed distribution were used (41% vs. 57%, respectively). In women only, the fraction of hypertension attributable to the indicator combining BMI and waist circumference (64%) was higher that observed using each indicator alone. CONCLUSIONS: Both BMI and abdominal circumference were positively and independently associated with the occurrence of arterial hypertension, the influence of BMI being higher among men.

Keywords : Hypertension; Body mass index; Abdominal circumference; Obesity; Attributable fraction.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in English | Portuguese     · English ( pdf ) | Portuguese ( pdf )