SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.16 issue1Understanding the low prevalence of weight-for-height deficit in lower-income Brazilian children: correlations among anthropometric indicesManaged care in Latin America: transnationalization of the health sector in a context of reform author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Page  

Cadernos de Saúde Pública

Print version ISSN 0102-311X

Abstract

MORAES, Claudia Leite  and  REICHENHEIM, Michael E.. Validity of neonatal clinical assessment for estimation of gestational age: comparison of New Ballard score with date of last menstrual period and ultrasonography. Cad. Saúde Pública [online]. 2000, vol.16, n.1, pp. 83-94. ISSN 0102-311X.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2000000100009.

The objective of this article is to evaluate the accuracy of the New Ballard (NB) score in detecting prematurity. Date of last menstrual period (LMP) and ultrasonography (USG) are used as reference procedures. First, an assessment of inter-observer reliability of the NB score measurements and the USG reports was carried out. Regarding the NB scores, the kappa coefficient and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient were, respectively, 0.74 (CI 95% 0.49-0.99) and 0.88 (CI 95% 0.78-0.93). For the USG analysis an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient of 0.96 (CI 95% 0.91-0.98) was found. Turning to validity, sensitivity of the NB score was below 0.70 in all but one comparison, irrespective of which procedure was taken as reference. Although specificity was consistently above 0.90, results suggest that the diagnostic ability of the NB score to detect prematurity is far from ideal. The proportion of false negatives may be a warning against its use alone, both in clinical practice and in epidemiological research contexts. Rather, the procedure should be recommended mainly as an accessory diagnostic tool.

Keywords : Gestational Age; Premature Infant; Diagnostic Test.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in Portuguese     · pdf in Portuguese