SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 issue11Healthy eating according to teenagers: perceptions, barriers, and expected characteristics of teaching materialsFactors associated with maintenance of teeth in adults in the State of São Paulo, Brazil author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Page  

Cadernos de Saúde Pública

Print version ISSN 0102-311X

Abstract

CHRESTANI, Maria Aurora Dropa; SANTOS, Iná da Silva dos  and  MATIJASEVICH, Alícia M.. Self-reported hypertension: validation in a representative cross-sectional survey. Cad. Saúde Pública [online]. 2009, vol.25, n.11, pp. 2395-2406. ISSN 0102-311X.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2009001100010.

To assess the validity of self-reported hypertension, a population-based cross-sectional study was carried out in Pelotas, Southern Brazil. Individuals aged 20 years were selected through probabilistic two-stage sampling. All 2,949 participants had their blood pressure measured twice (5 minutes apart) during a household visit. Those presenting systolic pressure 140mmHg and/or diastolic pressure 90mmHg were revisited. The gold standard for hypertension was the mean of the two measures taken at the second visit and/or use of anti-hypertensive drugs. Self-reported hypertension was obtained through the question: "Has any doctor ever said that you have high blood pressure?". Prevalence rates for self-reported and measured hypertension were 33.6% and 29.5%, respectively. Sensitivity was 84.3% (81.7-86.7%), specificity 87.5% (86.0-88.9%), positive predictive value 73.9% (71.0-76.6%), and negative predictive value 93.0% (91.8-94.1%). Self-reporting is a reliable method for monitoring prevalence of hypertension, one of the most important risk factors for chronic non-communicable diseases.

Keywords : Hypertension; Chronic Disease; Adult Health.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in Portuguese     · pdf in Portuguese