SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.27 issue9Resources and capacity of emergency trauma care services in PeruFirst insights into the genetic diversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in Salvador, Bahia State, Brazil author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Page  

Cadernos de Saúde Pública

Print version ISSN 0102-311X

Abstract

RIVERA, Francisco Javier Uribe. Argumentation and construction of validity in Carlos Matus' Situational Strategic Planning. Cad. Saúde Pública [online]. 2011, vol.27, n.9, pp. 1847-1858. ISSN 0102-311X.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2011000900018.

This study analyzes the process of producing a situational plan according to a benchmark from the philosophy of language and argumentation theory. The basic approach used in the analysis was developed by Carlos Matus. Specifically, the study seeks to identify the inherent argumentative structure and patterns in the situational explanation and regulatory design in a plan's operations, taking argumentative approaches from pragma-dialectics and informal logic as the analytical parameters. The explanation of a health problem is used to illustrate the study. Methodologically, the study is based on the existing literature on the subject and case analyses. The study concludes with the proposition that the use of the specific references means introducing greater rigor into both the analysis of the validity of causal arguments and the design of proposals for interventions, in order for them to be more conclusive in achieving a plan's objectives.

Keywords : Strategic Planning; Health Planning; Planning Techniques.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · pdf in Spanish