versión impresa ISSN 0021-2571
Ann. Ist. Super. Sanità vol.48 no.1 Roma ene. 2012
THE 3DIMENSIONAL MICROTOMOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
Valutazione comparativa di strumentazione cone beam CT con micro-CT nella visualizzazione del sistema di radici canalari
Bence Tamas SzaboI; Levente PatakyI; Regina MikusiI; Pal FejerdyII; Csaba Dobo-NagyI
IIndependent Section of Radiology
IIDepartment of Prosthodontics, Dental Faculty, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
The aim of this study was to compare three different cone-beam CT (CBCT) instruments used in dental clinical practice with micro-CT as gold standard. Three female monkeys' (Macaca fascicularis) skulls were selected and scanned by the tested CBCT-s. The most apical visible root canal level on the CBCT images was used as reference level (RL). After the image acquisition by CBCT-s dental jaw sections were scanned by micro-CT at a resolution of 17 μm. Out of the left second and third molars 25 root canals were selected and analysed by three observers at RL and following cross sectional parameters were determined: area of the lumen, major and minor diameters, aspect ratio and mean thickness. Results suggest that only high resolution CBCT instruments allow dentists detecting the full length of the root canal.
Key words: micro-CT, cone-beam CT, root canal morphology.
Lo scopo di questo studio è quello di confrontare tre differenti strumenti cone-beam TC (CBCT − tomografia computerizzata a fascio conico) utilizzati nella pratica clinica dentale con la micro-CT come gold standard. Sono stati selezionati tre crani di scimmie femmine (Macaca fascicularis) e analizzati attraverso il CBCT-s collaudato. È stato utilizzato come livello di riferimento (RL) quello più visibile a livello apicale del canale radicolare sulle immagini CBCT. Dopo l'acquisizione dell'immagine attraverso il CBCT-s, sono state esaminate le sezioni della mascella dentale con la micro-CT con una risoluzione di 17 μm. Sono stati selezionati 25 canali radicolari ed analizzati al livello di riferimento da tre osservatori e sono stati determinati i seguenti parametri della sezione trasversale: area del lume, diametri maggiore e minore, il rapporto e lo spessore medio aspettato. I risultati suggeriscono che solo gli strumenti CBCT ad alta risoluzione permettono ai dentisti di rilevare l'intera lunghezza del canale radicolare.
Parole chiave: micro-TC, tomografia computerizzata a fascio conico, morfologia canale dentale.
The success of endodontic treatments is defined by the knowledge of the dental root canals' morphology and the technique of the preparation and the hermetic obturation [1, 2]. The proper identification of the root canal system (number and shape of canals, accessory canals, etc.) is essential and requires clinical and radiological examinations. Different novel techniques and methods have been introduced and might facilitate the investigation of the root canal morphology , the knowledge of anatomic variations and helps in selecting proper instrumentation technique  even adequate files which might contribute to the success of the endodontic treatment.
At chairside the dentists should be aware of the variety of the root canals [4-7] during the access cavity preparation of the tooth a priori. Using operation microscope [8, 9] or CBCT (cone-beam CT) might simplify the localization and identification of the root canals . A good number of publications deal with the possible varieties of the root canal systems using CBCT-s [1, 10-20]. Three-dimensional imaging has an advantage to define the morphology of a root canal in space [16, 21]. CBCT has the unique feature that eliminates the superimposition of surrounding formulas . It might be useful in detecting the root canal shape, however, only a few studies have been reported on the visualization of the whole root canal shape from the entrance to the apical foramen using CBCT equipment yet .
In vitro studies focused on root canal morphology still have a continuous interest [22-27]. Over the past few years micro-CT systems have been used for the evaluation of the root canal morphology because of its high resolution and its nondestructive nature , furthermore it allows the observer evaluating the complete root canal system in different planes simultaneously or separately [32, 34]. For these reasons micro-CT is the best technology available now and might be functioned as a gold standard  besides using histopathological findings  or clinical sectioning .
The aim of this study was to compare three differing CBCT instruments with micro-CT as the gold standard to quantitatively determine their proficiencies with respect to imaging root canal systems.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Three female monkey's (Macaca fascicularis) skulls, cultured for other research purpose, were selected and scanned by the following CBCT instruments: Planmeca ProMax 3D Smart (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland), Classic i-CAT (Imaging Sciences Intenational, Hatfield, USA) and NewTom VG (ImageWorks, New York, USA). The acquisition was taken at the highest respective resolutions for each scanner: 100 μm isometric voxel size using Planmeca (84 kV, 10 mA), 250 μm isometric voxel size i-CAT (120 kV, 36 mA) and 100 × 100 × 150 μm non-isometric voxel size NewTom (110 kV, 0.50 mA). The following preparation was made of the dental jaw sections with the second and third molars. The cutout samples were scanned using SkyScan 1172 micro-CT (SkyScan, Kontich, Belgium) at a resolution of 17 μm (70 kV, 141μA) isometric cube voxel. The latter were used as a gold standard for comparison.
The root canal systems were dynamically analysed using CTAn v.1.1. software (SkyScan, Kontich, Belgium). The evaluation was made from coronal to apical level, in three plains from reconstructed images by three independent observers, two of whom have more than ten years experience in oral radiology and endodontology. The observers were not provided with results from related micro-CT analyses. The most apical level, where the root canal lumen was visible on the coronal plane of the CBCT images, was used as the reference level (RL). Root canal lumen was analysed at the RL on the axial planes of the reconstructed images taken by the micro-CT. Reconstruction of the micro-CT raw images was made by NRecon v.1.6 software (SkyScan, Kontich, Belgium). Manual tresholding of images was made, then the area of the lumen, the major and minor diameters, the mean thickness and the aspect ratio were subsequently determined.
The left upper second and third molars' mesiobuccal and distobuccal and the left lower second and third molars' mesial root canals (12 molars, 24 root canals and one accessory canal) were evaluated. Examining the images made by the Planmeca instrument, only one root canal apical end was invisible from 1.80 mm coronal to the apex (Table 1). NewTom VG showed a total of 11 apical root canal lumen being invisible, with a mean RL-apex distance of 2.79 ± 1.34 mm. Finally, i-CAT images showed 16 apical root canals being invisible, with a 3.62 ± 1.45 mm mean length for invisible parts. The cross section parameters of the root canal lumen were as follows: the mean minor diameter was 121.87 ± 86.85 μm and 69.46 ± 43.56 μm while the major diameter was 335.32 ± 210.69 μm and 187.07 ± 82.08 μm on i-CAT and NewTom images, respectively. The aspect ratios representing the cross sectional shape of the lumen were 3.11 ± 1.39 and 3.00 ± 0.98, respectively. Mean thickness of the root canal lumen at RL was 95.05 ± 44.34 μm and 55.06 ± 18.52 μm for i-CAT and NewTom, respectively.
The increasing importance and applications of CBCT-s can't be emphasize enough in everyday dental clinical practice and dental research . In endodontics it might aid the diagnosis of periapical lesions, identificiation of their origins and observing the canal morphology noninvasively [21, 38]. Nevertheless these instruments are not able to define the working length of a root canal.
Considering the results the instrument's resolution and the isotropic nature of the voxel size might be essential factors for detecting the full length of a root canal: with Planmeca only 4% (only one root canal apical end), with i-CAT 64% and with NewTom 44% of the 25 root canals' apical end was invisible. The reason of the high amount of the invisible apical ends might be that at the reference level some of the parameters describing the root canal might be smaller than the voxel size, among our selected parameters it was the minor diameter. This may certify the importance of selecting high resolution (smaller pixel size) in order to help in the visualization of the specimen. Michetti et al.  scanned 9 extracted human teeth using Kodak 9000 3D (Kodak Carestream Health, Trophy, France) at a resolution of 76 μm isotropic voxel size and validated by histologic sections. This study concluded that using high resolution CBCT instrument offers a noninvasive and detailed imaging method for exploring the complete root canal system's anatomy in 3D. This statement is in line with our Planmeca results, however Mitchetti used extracted teeth unlike us. In the planning phase of our study we focused on the possibility of spreading the availability of CBCT units in everyday endodontic practice. Hence the surrounding hard and soft tissues were kept, thus the noise of the scanned images was dramatically increased similar to CBCT images taken from living patients.
On the other hand partial volume effect also aids the visualization of the root canal's apical end on a CBCT image, but it does not provide reliable information on the thickness and contour of the root canal and may distort some variances of the cross sectional shapes. Moreover it is difficult to estimate which diameters define the visibility of the root canals. Further on, no one can determine to date the level where the partial volume effect starts on a visible root canal path.
To be aware of all these micro-CT is an important tool in order to detect the complete root canal system, though it is not available in clinical practice [33, 39]. Results indicate that micro-CT seems to be a useful tool for determining accuracy of clinically used CBCT instruments in a comparison. Within present techniques dentists should settle for detecting the entire length of root canal path. Solely high resolution CBCT instruments might help in the reliable visualization of the root canal improving the outcome of the endodontic treatment.
This study was supported by TÁMOP-4.2.1/B-09/1/KMR-20100001 grant.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no potential conflicts of interest or any financial or personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately bias conduct and findings of this study.
1. Baratto Filho F, Zaitter S, Haragushiku GA, de Campos EA, Abuabara A, Correr GM. Analysis of the internal anatomy of maxillary first molars by using different methods. J Endod 2009;35:337-42. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2008.09.029. [ Links ]
2. Vertucci F. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endod Topics 2005;10:3-29. doi:10.1186/14712342-11-14. [ Links ]
3. Adorno CG, Yoshioka T, Suda H. The effect of root preparation technique and instrumentation length on the development of apical root cracks. J Endod 2009;35:389-92. [ Links ]
4. Robinson S, Czerny C, Gahleitner A, Bernhart T, Kainberger FM. Dental CT evaluation of mandibular first premolar root configurations and canal variations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002;93:328-32. [ Links ]
5. Stropko JJ. Canal morphology of maxillary molars: clinical observations of canal configurations. J Endod 1999;25:446-50. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.71652 [ Links ]
6. Barbizam JV, Ribeiro RG, Tanomaru Filho M. Unusual anatomy of permanent maxillary molars. J Endod 2004;30:668-71. [ Links ]
7. Favieri A, Barros FGB, Campos LC. Root canal therapy of a maxillary first molar with five root canals: case report. Braz Dent J 2006;17:75-8. [ Links ]
8. Görduysus MO, Görduysus M, Friedman S. Operating microscope improves negotiation of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars. J Endod 2001;27:683-6. [ Links ]
9. TzanetakisGN,LagoudakosTA,KontakiotisEG.Endodontic treatment of a mandibular second premolar with four canals using operating microscope. J Endod 2007;33:318-21. [ Links ]
10. Jung MS, Lee SP, Kim GT, Choi SC, Park JH, Kim JW. Threedimensionalanalysisof deciduousmaxillaryanteriorteethusing cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Anat 2012;25(2):182-8. doi: 10.1002/ca.21200 [ Links ]
11. Kottoor J, Velmurugan N, Surendran S. Endodontic management of a maxillary first molar with eight root canal systems evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography scanning: a case report. J Endod 2011;37:715-9. [ Links ]
12. Ioannidis K, Lambrianidis T, Beltes P, Besi E, Malliari M. Endodontic management and cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of seven maxillary and mandibular molars with single roots and single canals in a patient. J Endod 2011; 37:103-9. [ Links ]
13. Krithikadatta J, Kottoor J, Karumaran CS, Rajan G. Mandibular first molar having an unusual mesial root canal morphology with contradictory cone-beam computed tomography findings: a case report. J Endod 2010;36:1712-6. [ Links ]
14. Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Ahuja R, Subbarao CV, Gutmann JL. Cone-beam computed tomography study of root and canal morphology of maxillary first and second molars in an Indian population. J Endod 2010;36:1622-7. [ Links ]
15. Kottoor J, Velmurugan N, Sudha R, Hemamalathi S. Maxillary first molar with seven root canals diagnosed with cone-beam computed tomography scanning: a case report. J Endod 2010; 36:915-21. [ Links ]
16. Blattner TC, George N, Lee CC, Kumar V, Yelton CD. Efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography as a modality to accurately identify the presence of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first and second molars: a pilot study. J Endod 2010;36:867-70. [ Links ]
17. Zhang R, Wang H, Tian YY, Yu X, Hu T, Dummer PM. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate root and canal morphology of mandibular molars in Chinese individuals. Int Endod J 2011;44(11):990-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591 [ Links ]
18. Kottoor J, Hemamalathi S, Sudha R, Velmurugan N. Maxillary second molar with 5 roots and 5 canals evaluated using cone beam computerized tomography: a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:e162-5. [ Links ]
19. Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Ahuja R, Subbarao CV, Gutmann JL. Cone-beam computed tomography study of root and canal morphology of maxillary first and second molars in an Indian population. J Endod 2010;36:1622-7. [ Links ]
20. Zheng QH, Wang Y, Zhou XD, Wang Q, Zheng GN, Huang DM. A cone-beam computed tomography study of maxillary first permanent molar root and canal morphology in a Chinese population. J Endod 2010;36:1480-4. [ Links ]
21. Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Endodontic Applications of Cone-Beam Volumetric Tomography. J Endod 2007;33:1121-32. [ Links ]
22. Michetti J, Maret D, Mallet JP, Diemer F. Validation of cone beam computed tomography as a tool to explore root canal anatomy. J Endod 2010;36:1187-90. [ Links ]
23. Matherne RP, Angelopoulos C, Kulild JC, Tira D. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to identify root canal systems in vitro. J Endod 2008;34:87-9. [ Links ]
24. Sberna MT, Rizzo G, Zacchi E, Capparè P, Rubinacci A. A preliminary study of the use of peripheral quantitative computed tomography for investigating root canal anatomy. Int Endod J 2009;42:66-75. [ Links ]
25. Dobó NC, Keszthelyi G, Sulyok P, Ledeczky G, Szabó J. Mathematical description of the three-dimensional axis of the root canal of human teeth. Fogorv Sz 2002;95:155-7. [ Links ]
26. Bagherian A, Kalhori KA, Sadeghi M, Mirhosseini F, Parisay I. An in vitro study of root and canal morphology of human deciduous molars in an Iranian population. J Oral Sci 2010; 52:397-403. [ Links ]
27. Dobó NC, Ledeczky G, Sulyok P, Szabó J. Mathematical classification of root canal curvature of human teeth. Fogorv Sz 2002;95:55-8. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e328329f9ca [ Links ]
28. Lee JK, Ha BH, Choi JH, Heo SM, Perinpanayagam H. Quantitative three-dimensional analysis of root canal curvature in maxillary first molars using micro-computed tomography. J Endod 2006;32:941-5. [ Links ]
29. Gao Y, Peters OA, Wu H, Zhou X. An application framework of three-dimensional reconstruction and measurement for endodontic research. J Endod 2009;35:269-74. [ Links ]
30. Gu Y, Lu Q, Wang H, Ding Y, Wang P, Ni L. Root canal morphology of permanent three-rooted mandibular first molars-part I: pulp floor and root canal system. J Endod 2010; 36:990-4. [ Links ]
31. Yu DC, Tam A, Schilder H. Root canal anatomy illustrated by microcomputed tomography and clinical cases. Gen Dent 2006; 54:331-5. doi: 10.1016/j. msec.2007.10.077 [ Links ]
32. Plotino G, Grande NM, Pecci R, Bedini R, Pameijer CH, Somma F. Three-dimensional imaging using microcomputed tomography for studying tooth macromorphology. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:1555-61. [ Links ]
33. Rhodes JS, Ford TR, Lynch JA, Liepins PJ, Curtis RV. Micro-computed tomography: a new tool for experimental endodontology. Int Endod J 1999;32:165-70. [ Links ]
34. Gu Y, Lu Q, Wang P, Ni L. Root canal morphology of permanent three-rooted mandibular first molars: Part II--measurement of root canal curvatures. J Endod 2010;36:1341-6. [ Links ]
35. Balto K, Müller R, Carrington DC, Dobeck J, Stashenko P. Quantification of periapical bone destruction in mice by micro-computed tomography. J Dent Res 2000;79:35-40. [ Links ]
36. de Paula-Silva FW, Wu MK, Leonardo MR, da Silva LA, Wesselink PR. Accuracy of periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography scans in diagnosing apical periodontitis using histopathological findings as a gold standard. J Endod 2009;35:1009-12. [ Links ]
37. De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GRJ. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: A systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38:609-25. [ Links ]
38. Huumonen S, Kvist T, Gröndahl K, Molander A. Diagnostic value of computed tomography in re-treatment of root fillings in maxillary molars. Int Endod J 2006;39:827-33. [ Links ]
39. Kim I, Paik KS, Lee SP. Quantitative evaluation of the accuracy of micro-computed tomography in tooth measurement. Clin Anat 2007;20:27-34. doi:10.1002/ca. 20265. [ Links ]
Address for correspondence:
Bence Tamas Szabo
Independent Section of Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Semmelweis University
Szentkirályi Street 47
Budapest 1088, Hungary
Submitted on invitation.
Accepted on 19 December 2011.