On-line version ISSN 1518-8787
Rev. Saúde Pública vol.42 n.5 São Paulo Oct. 2008
Traducción, adaptación y validez de la construcción de la Prueba del Reloj aplicado entre los ancianos en Brasil
Kelly Cristina Atalaia-SilvaI, II; Roberto Alves LourençoII, III
de Psicologia. Instituto de Ciências Humanas. Universidade Federal de
Juiz de Fora. Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil
IIPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências Médicas. Faculdade de Ciências Médicas (FCM). Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ). Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
IIIDepartamento de Medicina Interna. FCM. UERJ. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
In Brazil, not many studies have investigated the validation of cognitive tests
in the ageing population and none of them has analyzed the psychometric properties
of Tuokko's Clock Test. The objective of the study was to translate and adapt
the test to the Brazilian context, and to assess its construct validation.
METHODS: This is a cross-sectional population-based study, involving 353 elderly patients from Juiz de Fora (Southeastern Brazil), from 2004-2005. To assess convergent and divergent validities Pearson's correlation statistics was used. The Clock Test substests were correlated with theses reference instruments: mini-mental state examination, digits, block design to evaluate the convergent validity. the divergent validity was assessed by comparing the substests to the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale.
RESULTS: In the sample, 74.1% were women, aged between 63 and 107 years (73.8±8.5), average schooling was 7.4 years (SD=4.7). In regard to convergent validity, significant correlations were found between all CT subtests and MMSE, Digits, and Block Design (p<0.01). As for the divergent validity, the only subtest that had significant association with the reference scale was the "clock setting" (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The translated and validated Clock Test into a community sample of aged showed to be a brief screening instrument, with good construct validity when compared to other studies. Future research must investigate other psychometric properties, such as content and criterion validities.
Descriptors: Aged. Dementia, diagnosis. Neuropsychological Tests. Translations. Validation Studies.
Pocos estudios en Brasil investigaron la validez de las pruebas cognitivas en
muestras poblacionales de ancianos y ninguno analizó las propiedades
psicométricas de la Prueba del Reloj de Tuokko. El objetivo del estudio
fue traducir y adaptar el modelo de dicha prueba al contexto brasilero y evaluar
su validez de construcción.
MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio transversal con una muestra poblacional constituida por 353 individuos de la ciudad de Juiz de Fora (Sureste de Brasil), 2004-2005. Para evaluar la validez convergente y discriminante, se utilizó la correlación de Pearson. Las subpruebas de la Prueba del Reloj se correlacionaron con los instrumentos de referencia: cubos y dígitos, y mini-prueba del estado mental para evaluar la validez convergente. La validez discriminante fue investigada por medio de la correlación de las subpruebas con Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depresión Scale.
RESULTADOS: De la muestra, 74,1% eran del sexo femenino, con edad entre 63 y 107 años (73,8+8,5) y promedio de escolaridad de 7,4 años (DP= 4,7). Se obtuvo validez convergente, con correlaciones estadísticamente significativas entre todas las subpruebas (p<0,01). Con relación a la validez discriminante, la única subprueba que tuvo correlación significativa con la escala de referencia fue "la señalización de las horas" (p<0,05).
CONCLUSIONES: La Prueba del Reloj traducida y adaptada en una muestra comunitaria de ancianos indicó ser un instrumento de rastreo cognitivo breve, con buena validez de construcción cuando se utiliza en análisis de otros datos de la literatura. Futuros trabajos deben investigar otras propiedades psicométricas, como la validez de criterio y contenido.
Descriptores: Anciano. Demencia, diagnóstico. Pruebas Neuropsicológicas. Traducción (Producto). Estudios de Validación.
In the early days, population ageing was mainly observed in developed countries, but nowadays, it is in developing countries that the elderly population is soaring.24 This demographic transition is in tandem with a transition in the morbidity and mortality profile, which is mirrored by the increase in prevalence of chronic-degenerative disease, such as Alzheimer.
Dementia processes are among the main health problems in the elderly population. An early diagnosis is crucial to obtain better results during therapy. There are some actions that enable delaying the functional loss period, mitigating unnecessary suffering of patients and their family, in addition to improving the life quality of the people involved. These actions include: pharmacological measures (galantamine, rivastigmine and donepezil)15 and non-pharmacological measures, such as cognitive rehabilitation.3
Diagnosing dementia syndromes is frequently a problem, especially in Alzheimer's, where certainty can only be achieved in post mortem studies. This being the case, the adopted standard for clinical diagnoses are based on diagnosing criteria established by international agencies (DSM-IV,2 CID-1013 and National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association).
Neuropsychological tests are tools to aid in early diagnoses of dementia processes. Tests used for cognitive monitoring are known to be easy to apply and can be carried out in a short period of time. They are important since they enable most dementia cases to be identified in places where there is shortage of time and/or qualified human resources, such as in primary healthcare services.
Despite the absence of a standardized way of applying and checking the Clock Test, it is widely accepted as a cognitive monitoring tool. The most commonly used methods in medical practice, according to Braunberger,a are the ones proposed by: Shulman et al,17 Sunderland et al,21 Wolf-Klein et al,26 Mendez et al,12 Tuokko et al,23 Manos & Wu,11 and Shua-Haim et al.16 The differences in applying them are in the instructions given for the task, the time patients have to write down the answers, in addition to the scoring system adopted by each test. From the point of view of cognitive impairment scores, it is assumed that the clock test assesses visuospatial abilities, constructive abilities, and executive functions.20
In a review study, Shulman18 found that most clock test studies had sensitivity and specificity rates of approximately 85%, and high acceptability rates on the part of patients. However, despite the test's importance, in Brazil, only a very limited number of studies have been devoted to investigating clock test methods, scores, and psychometric characteristics, especially in regard to the validity of the tool.5,10,b
Construct validity, since it assesses the legitimacy of behavioral representation of latent features,14 is probably the most fundamental way of studying neuropsychological tools and it has been employed by many authors in clock test assessment.
Hadjistavropoulos et al,6 in order to assess clock test construct validity, investigated convergent and discriminant validities. It was found that there was a significant correlation between clock test score and Digits and Block Design WAIS-III scale subtests, and there was no correlation with the Kozma & Stones8 happiness scale.
A more comprehensive way of using the clock test in cognitive assessment was developed by Tuokko et al.23 The authors took into consideration that the concept of time is abstract and that the abilities to draw, set and read certain times seem to be particularly sensitive in identifying cognitive impairment.
This new test, herein called the Tuokko Clock Test (CT), is a clinical and research tool developed to detect cognitive impairment, with emphasis in investigating visuospatial, construction, visuoperceptive and abstract-conceptual abilities. The authors included two further tasks - setting and reading the time -, believing that theses additional tasks would enable a better understanding of cognitive impairment during its initial stages, when compared to clock drawing in isolation.
According to Tuokko et al,23 the CT is a low-cost, reliable, valid and very useful tool in diagnosing dementia, especially when used in tandem with other cognitive assessment techniques and interviews with the patient and his/her family members.
Since it is a broader tool and uses tasks involving drawing, setting and reading the time, the CT can be useful in early diagnosis of suspected dementia also in individuals with little or no schooling. This is because performance in cognitive assessment tools is affected by schooling, a very significant variable in this kind of population study, such as the one addressed in this paper. Therefore, it is important to develop Brazilian studies to further investigate the CT.
The objective of the presnet study was to translate and operationally adapt the Tuokko clock test model to the Brazilian context and to assess construct validation.
The CT was applied in a population of elderly individuals living in the city of Juiz de Fora (Southeastern Brazil), between June 2004 and February 2005. This study is part of the Estudo dos Processos de Envelhecimento Saudável - PENSA [Healthy Ageing Process Study], carried out in the city of Juiz de Fora.
CT translation, adaptation and validation were authorized by the author of the original tool.8 One of the authors (KCAS) translated the tool, which was submitted to a second translator (a Brazilian proficient in English).
The way the CT is applied and checked means a high cost to the reality in Brazil, because each kit is made up of seven detachable cards with carbon paper. In the original version the subject was not able to see what he/she had just done. This was possible because the cards were detached as soon as the subject finished the drawing.
In operationally adapting the CT, the number of cards and the material used in making the test kit were reduced, aiming at adapting the tool to the study's operational boundaries.
Pre-testing involved a sample of 20 elderly patients at the outpatient clinic of the university hospital, and resulted in making changes to the frame in the clock drawing subtest.
The frame consists of windows that open and close. When using the frame, the examiner must lift one window at a time (from biggest to smallest) and close them as soon as the patient has finished drawing, so the patient does not see what he/she has just finished doing or what will be the next drawing (Figure 1). After adjusting the frame, 20 other patients at a center for the elderly connected to research activities of a local university were submitted to the CT. After carrying out the test, the individuals were asked about the instructions for the tasks in the CT. No additional operational change was needed seeing that no patient reported difficulties in understanding or performing the tasks.
Between June and July 2004, the field researchers - four interviewers and one recruiter - were trained to apply the instrument. In the last stage, two assessors checked the CT. Standardization of checking procedures among assessors reported inter- and intra assessor agreement of 0.95 kappa in a sample of 20 patients. Test-retest agreement based on two assessors and 20 tests, over a two-month period, had kappa values of 1.0 and 9.4 per assessor.
The sample of the larger study (PENSA) was made up of elderly individuals in the community, residing in Juiz de Fora districts that accounted for 15% or more of the total city population. By using the door-to-door method of the Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (Brazilian Institute for Geography and Statistics), 956 elderly individuals were included in this study.4
From this total, a randomized sample of 40% of the cases was selected to take part in this study. The inclusion criteria were: being able to hear and understand well enough to be able to take part in an interview and signing the informed consent form.
The total number of subjects selected to take part in this study was 382, of which 353 agreed to participate (92.4%). The reasons for not participating were: 27.7% death; 24.1% incapacity; 34.5% refusal and loss to follow up; and 13.7% moved.
The CT involves three empirical tasks: clock drawing, clock setting, and clock reading. The clock drawing subtest consists of a printed circle where the examinee must place the numbers and the hands of the clock showing 11.10 (Figure 2). Checking this subtest consists of a detailed qualitative and quantitative system of addressing the mistakes made by the examinee. The score system classifies the mistakes in seven broad categories: omission, absence, perseveration, distortion, substitution, addition and rotation. To classify and obtain the score, mistakes in drawing the face of the clock, the numbers, the hands and the spaces between the numbers are analyzed. One point is attributed to each mistake and there is no maximum score, although one rarely sees scores above 31 points.
The clock setting subtest consists of five circles on which the examinee is asked to draw the hands showing 3 o'clock, 9.15, 1 o'clock, 11.10, and 7.30 (Figure 1). Checking this subtest consists of giving one point for every hand placed correctly, and an additional point when the hour hand is smaller than the minute hand (total=15 points).
The clock reading subtest (Figure 3) consists of a notebook where clocks (set to the same time as in the clock setting subtest) are shown to the examinee who must express the time shown on each clock. Checking consists of attributing one point to each hand read correctly and one additional point when both hands are read correctly (total=15 points).
To assess CT construct validation, the tools we used were: the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Digits, Block Design and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). The MMSE is made up of 30 items, with subtests that assess spatial-temporal orientation, immediate memory, evocation, procedural memory, and language. The score ranges from 0 to 30 points. The cut-off points adopted in this study were the ones in Almeida:1 19/20 for individuals with no schooling and 23/24 for individuals with some formal schooling.
The Digits and Block Design subtests are part of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Third Edition (WAIS-III). The first aims at assessing memory, immediate repletion, attention and working memory. The score is obtained through the total number managed backwards and forwards added together, and the maximum score is 30. The Block Design subtest assesses perceptual and visual organization, ability of abstract thinking, non-verbal concept formation and spatial visualization. The maximum score for this subtest is 68.
The CES-D consists of items that assess symptoms of depression on the week prior to the application of the tool. The score ranges from zero to 60. It was validated for Brazil by Silveira & Jorge.19 The cutoff point adopted in this study was 16.
The clock-drawing subtest score was converted into totaling correct answers to match the same scale as the other subtests. To compare the studied population to the original PENSA population, we used the T test matched to the continuous variable "schooling", and McNemar for the dichotomous variable "gender".
Convergent and discriminant validities were statistically analyzed through Pearson's correlation. CT subtests were correlated to Block Design and Digits on the WAIS-III and MMSE to assess convergent validity. Discriminant validity was obtained through the correlation between CT subtests with the CES-D.
Data were analyzed through SPSS version 10.0 statistics software.
The study received approval of the Research Ethics Committee at the University Hospital of Juiz de Fora, (#463.148.2004).
All individuals completed the test, and the respective data were analyzed for the entire population of which 74.1% were women, aged between 63 and 107 years (average age 73.8 years; standard-deviation 8.5; median 73; and mode 63). Higher ages prevailed (63.1% were older than 70 years of age). Approximately 7.9% of the elderly individuals informed having a university degree (Table 1).
When compared to the original PENSA population, there were no differences in the gender and schooling variables. The mean and the standard deviation for schooling in the PENSA sample were 7.1±4.4, and in the studied sample they were 7.4±4.6 (t=0.907; p<0.36). Women accounted for 71.8% of the PENSA sample, whereas in this study they represented 74.1% of the population (agreement rate=84%; p<0.38).
In the clock-setting subtest there was a concentration of higher scale-values (mean 10.3 and SD=3.9). The same was noted in the clock-drawing subtest (mean 3.9 and SD= 5.7). The clock-reading subtest presented the most homogenous results among the elderly (mean 12.5 and DP=3.4). In regard to time required, the average CT time was 4.9 minutes.
The sample's cognitive performance when assessed by the MMSE averaged 25.3 (SD=3.3), median 26, and mode 27. At the 23/24 cut-off point, 21.2% of the sample was cognitively impaired.
In the Block Design subtest, the mean was 16.9 (SD=8,4), median 16, and mode 12. In the Digits subtest the mean was 11.4 (SD=3.5), median 11, and mode 10.
Performance according to the CES-D averaged 15.8 (SD=8.5), median 12, and mode 10. At the cut-off point of 16, which was suggested by the Brazilian study on the validation of the scale, 31.5% of the sample would be suspected of depression.
Correlations among CT subtests, and the latter test and the following MMSE, Block Design, Digits, and CES-D tests can be seen in Table 2.
Internal consistency among CT subtests, according to Cronbach's alpha, was 0.773.
This is the first Brazilian study which applied the CT to a sample of the elderly population, by translating, operationally adapting, and validating the construct.
Herdman et al7 suggest that in a universalist approach to transcultural adaptation it is necessary to investigate the conceptual, item, semantics, operational, measurement and functional equivalences of the tool.
In the present study we did not consider carrying out all the stages proposed by these authors to be necessary for the following reasons: applying the CT is simple, there is no semantic diversity, and it is not a scale of written items. And this is because the CT consists of straightforward instructions for tasks which do not require subjective interpretation on the part of the examiner or the examinee. On the other hand, we adopted the conceptual equivalence of the CT in the Canadian and Brazilian cultures, where the concept of hours and minutes as a measurement of time and the use of analogical clocks as a means of measuring time are basic premises.
For the same reason, our initial impression was that it would not be necessary to have one group of independent translators carry out the translation and another group for back translation. During pre-testing, examinees said that the test instructions were easy to understand, and there were no problems in performing the task after instructions were given for the first time. It seems that the lack of difficulties confirm our initial hypothesis concerning the kind of translation adopted. However, it is possible that the lack of difficulties in understanding the instructions may have resulted from the fact that the individuals in the sample had a higher schooling rate than rates in other Brazilian population studies.10 Thus, conducting focus groups with elderly individuals with different schooling rates, would probably yield more objective elements to support our hypothesis.
However, the possibility of adopting similar forms of the instrument, concerning format, instructions, applying and checking - operational equivalence -, was an essential task. Due to the high costs of the original CT version, adapting the test operationally was essential because of the limited resources available for this study. In any case, operationally adapting cognitive tests in general is also necessary to ensure the high cost of these tests does not prevent them from being acquired and employed in Brazil's public health services. The adapted version of this study seems not to have interfered in the results, because the construct validity found was similar to the Canadian one.
The average CT test time (4.9 minutes) positions the tool as a "short" monitoring instrument. 9 Another positive aspect is that, due to its simplicity and speedy application, the CT can aid cognitive impairment diagnoses in places where there is shortage of time and of qualified professionals in cognitive assessment. However, no other studies were found on measuring the time of the CT, thus, this study is the first to investigate this variable.
As our first approach to the CT measurement equivalence, we examined its construct validity. Seeing that this is the first Brazilian study on the tool, we believed that investigating a population-based sample would be more interesting because it would enable us to describe its construct validity and performance profile in a sample of individuals who were supposedly not cognitively impaired. Based on the data gathered, the normative data will be addressed in future papers. In the future, as soon as clinical data on the cognitive performance of the individuals in the sample are available, criterion validity will be addressed.
The correlation with other cognitive assessment scales that have already been validated in Brazil (MMSE and WAIS-III subtests) suggests that the CT is able to measure what it aims at measuring. We found positive and significant correlations, however they presented weak to moderate association strength. This leads us to believe that maybe the constructs assessed by the CT, MMSE, Digits and Block Design are similar, but not identical. The Digits subtest is the most specific to assess working memory, and Block Design for assessing visuospatial planning. This is a commonly found problem in psychometrics, seeing that there are no specific tests to assess identical constructs. However, other studies22,23 assessing the correlation between these subtests also found weak to moderate association strength. This may show that maybe the association among these variables truly behaves in the fashion found in this study, since there really are differences among the constructs individually assessed per instrument.
On the other hand, Kurzmanc states that, in general, convergent validity correlations are high when they are calculated based on clinical samples, contrary to what is found in population samples. This may happen because the score variation in normal individuals is limited. The Canadian CT study also found moderate associations for its correlations.23
In the discriminant validity, there was no correlation between clock drawing and clock reading subtests with the measure for symptoms of depression. In the Canadian CT study, none of the subtests were correlated to the mood scale.23 However, in this study, the clock setting subtest presented a negative and significant correlation with the CES-D (r=-0.118; p< 0.05), meaning that the more symptoms of depression individuals have, the worse their performance in this subtest. This may be explained by the fact that this subtest requires more attention capacity, which is frequently altered in individuals suffering from depression. However, the strength of this correlation and the CES-D and the clock setting subtest was very weak, accounting for a spurious association.
In conclusion, the translated and adapted CT applied to a population sample of non-clinical Brazilian elderly individuals proved to be a short cognitive monitoring tool, which presented good construct validity when compared to other data in the literature. Its psychometric features concerning content validity and criterion validity deserve to be addressed in future studies, as do its sensitivity and specificity values.
1. Almeida OP. Mini-exame do estado mental e o diagnóstico de demências no Brasil. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1998;56(3-B):605-12. [ Links ]
2. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-IV - TR. Manual de diagnóstico e estatística das perturbações mentais. Lisboa: Climepsi; 2002. [ Links ]
3. Ávila R, Miotto EC. Funções executivas no envelhecimento normal e na doença de Alzheimer. J Bras Psiq. 2003;52(1):53-61. [ Links ]
4. Batistoni SST, Neri AL, Cupertino APFB. Validade da escala de depressão do Center for Epidemiological Studies entre idosos brasileiros. Rev Saude Publica. 2007;41(4):598-605. DOI: 10.1590/S0034-89102007000400014 [ Links ]
5. Fuzikawa C, Lima-Costa MF, Uchoa E, Barreto SM, Shulman K. A population based study on the intra and inter-rater reliability of the clock drawing test in Brazil: the Bambuí health and ageing study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003;1895):450-6. DOI: 10.1002/gps.863 [ Links ]
6. Hadjistavropoulos T, Tuokko H, Beattie BL. The clock test: construct validity for a multidimensional assessement method [Abstract]. Can Psychol. 1991;32(2a):219. [ Links ]
7. Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Badia X. A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQOL instruments: the universalist approach. Qual Life Res. 1998;7(4):323-35. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008846618880 [ Links ]
8. Kozma A, Stones MJ. The measurement of happiness; development of the Memorial University of Newfoundland Happiness Scale (MUNSH). J Gerontol. 1980;35(6):906-12. [ Links ]
9. Lorentz WJ, Scanlan JM., Borson S. Brief screening tests for dementia. Can J Psychiatry. 2002;47(8):723-33. [ Links ]
10. Lourenço RA, Ribeiro-Filho ST, Moreira IFH, Paradela EMPS, Miranda AS. The clock drawing test: utility in elderly with low education level. In: Annual Meeting Abstract Book, Las Vegas, USA. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Apr;52(4):S58-S58. [ Links ]
11. Manos PJ, Wu R. The ten-point clock test: a quick screen and grading method for cognitive impairment in medical and surgical patients. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1994;24(3):229-44. [ Links ]
12. Mendez MF, Ala T, Underwood KL. Development of scoring criteria for the clock drawing task in Alzheimer's disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:1095-9. [ Links ]
13. Organização Mundial da Saúde. Classificação estatística internacional de doenças. 10. ed. São Paulo: EDUSP; 2007. [ Links ]
14. Pasquali L. Psicometria: teoria dos testes na psicologia e na educação. Petrópolis: Vozes; 2003. [ Links ]
15. Rockwood K, Fay S, Song X, MacKnight C, Gorman M. Video-Imaging Synthesis of Treating Alzheimer's Disease (VISTA) Investigators. Attainment of treatment goals bay people with Alzheimer´s disease receiving galantamine: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ. 2006;174(8):1099-105. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.051432 [ Links ]
16. Shua-Haim J, Koppuzha G, Shua-Haim V, Gross J.A simple scoring system for clock drawing in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Am J Alzheimer's Dis. 1997;12(5): 212-5. DOI: 10.1177/153331759701200505 [ Links ]
17. Shulman KI, Shedletsky R, Silver IL. The chalenge of time: clock-drawing and cognitive function in the elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1986;1(2):135-40. DOI: 10.1002/gps.930010209 [ Links ]
18. Shulman Kl. Clock-drawing: is it the ideal cognitive screening test? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry.2000;15(6):548-61. DOI: 10.1002/1099-1166(200006)15:6<548:AID-GPS242>3.0.CO;2-U [ Links ]
19. Silveira D, Jorge M. Propriedades psicométricas da Escala de Rastreamento para Depressão, CES-D, em populações clínica e não clínicas de adolescentes e adultos jovens. Rev Psiquiatr Clin. 1997;25(5):251-61. [ Links ]
20. Spreen O, Strauss E. A compendium of neuropsychological tests. Administration, norms, and commentary. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. [ Links ]
21. Sunderland T, Hill JL, Mellow AM, Lawlor B, Gundersheime J, Newhouse P, et al. Clock drawing in Alzheimer´s disease: a novel measure of dementia severity. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1989;37:725-9. [ Links ]
22. Taylor JL, Miller TP, Tinklenberg JR. Correlates of memory decline: a 4-year longitudinal study of older with memory complaints. Psychol Aging. 1992;7(2):185-93. DOI: 10.1037/0882-79126.96.36.199 [ Links ]
23. Tuokko H, Hadjistavropoulos T, Miller, JA, Beattie BL. The clock test: a sensitive measure to differentiate normal elderly from those with Alzheimer´s disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:579-84. [ Links ]
24. Veras RP. Desafios e conquistas advindas da longevidade da população: o setor saúde e suas necessárias transformações. In: Veras RP, organizador. Velhice numa perspectiva de futuro saudável. Rio de Janeiro: UERJ; 2001. p.11-32. [ Links ]
25. Wolf-Klein GP, Silverstone FA, Levy AP, Brod MS, Breuer J. Screening for Alzheimer´s disease by clock drawing. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1989;37:730-4. [ Links ]
Correspondence: Received: 4/24/2006 Article based on
KC Atalaia-Silva's master's thesis presented to the Graduate Program in Medical
Sciences at the School of Medical Sciences at the Universidade do Estado do
Rio de Janeiro, in 2006.
Kelly Cristina Atalaia-Silva
Rua Santo Antônio 640/602 - Centro
36015-001 Juiz de Fora, MG, Brasil
a Braunberger P. Clock drawing test. [S.l.: s.ed.]; 2001 [internet]. [cited 2004 Nov 14]. Available from: http://188.8.131.52/clinicalassistant/scales/clock_drawing_test.htm
b Okamoto IH. Aspectos cognitivos da doença de Alzheimer no teste do relógio: avaliação de amostra da população brasileira [Doctoral thesis]. São Paulo: Universidade Federal de São Paulo; 2001.
c Kurzman D. The construct validity of the Clock Test in normal and demented adults. [Doctoral thesis]. Victoria: University of Victoria; 1992.
Article based on
KC Atalaia-Silva's master's thesis presented to the Graduate Program in Medical
Sciences at the School of Medical Sciences at the Universidade do Estado do
Rio de Janeiro, in 2006.