SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.80 issue4The contribution of breast milk to toddler diets in western KenyaEstimating human rabies mortality in the United Republic of Tanzania from dog bite injuries author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Page  

Bulletin of the World Health Organization

Print version ISSN 0042-9686

Bull World Health Organ vol.80 n.4 Genebra Jan. 2002

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0042-96862002000400008 

Gender and use of cataract surgical services in developing countries

Susan Lewallen1& Paul Courtright1

 

 


OBJECTIVE: To determine, from the existing literature, cataract surgical coverage rates by sex and the proportion of cataract blindness that could be eliminated if women and men had equal access to cataract surgical services.
METHOD: Methodologically sound population-based cataract surveys from developing countries were identified through a literature search. Cataract surgical coverage rates were extracted from the surveys and rates for women were compared to those for men. Peto odds ratios were calculated for each survey and a meta-analysis of the surveys was performed.
FINDINGS: From a literature review and meta-analysis of cataract surveys in developing countries, we found that the cataract surgical coverage rate was 1.2—1.7 times higher for males than for females. For females, the odds ratio of having surgery, compared to males, was 0.67 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.60— 0.74). Despite their lower coverage rate, females accounted for approximately 63% of all cataract cases in the study populations, and if they received surgery at the same rates as males, the prevalence of cataract blindness would be reduced by a median of 12.5% (range 4—21%).
CONCLUSION: Closing the gender gap could thus significantly decrease the prevalence of cataract blindness, and gender-sensitive intervention programmes are needed to improve cataract surgical coverage among females.

Keywords Cataract extraction; Health services accessibility; Sex factors; Prejudice; Review literature; Meta-analysis; Developing countries (source: MeSH, NLM).

Mots clés Extraction cataracte; Accessibilité service santé; Facteur sexuel; Préjugé; Revue de la littérature; Méta-analyse; Pays en développement (source: MeSH, INSERM).

Palabras clave Extracción de catarata; Accesibilidad a los servicios de salud; Factores sexuales; Prejuicio; Literatura de revisión; Meta-análisis; Países en desarrollo (fuente: DeCS, BIREME).

Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2002;80:300-303.


 

 

Introduction

Women bear approximately two-thirds of the global burden of blindness, with cataract being the major cause in developing countries (1), and it is likely that much of the excess female blindness in these countries is due to cataract. To examine whether the problem of cataract blindness is being addressed by local services, we reviewed population-based cataract surveys of developing countries, and determined the cataract surgical coverage rate (2, 3) for males and females. This is defined as the number of cataract blind who have been operated divided by the total number of cataract blind (operated plus unoperated people) in the population.

 

Methods

To identify surveys of cataract blindness, we searched several computer databases, including Medline, Embase, Healthstar, Current Contents, LILAC, Scisearch and Biosis. This ensured coverage of journals from Europe, North and South America, and Asia. All databases turned up surveys listed in Medline. To identify further relevant citations, we reviewed references cited in the retrieved surveys.

All identified articles and surveys were reviewed, using a standard checklist, to select those that met the following criteria: they were methodologically sound population-based prevalence surveys that included (but were not limited to) adults; they had a minimum sample size of 1000 and at least an 80% survey response rate; they were published between 1980 and 1999 and written in English, French, Chinese, Spanish, or Portuguese; and they reported the number of cataract blind and the number having cataract surgery, by sex.

From the eight surveys that met the above criteria, we extracted the cataract surgical coverage rate for males and females. Data were synthesized and analysed using the Cochrane Review Manager software, RevMan 4.0 for Windows. Peto odds ratios and a fixed-effects model were used to combine data across all surveys. For each survey, we also calculated how many additional females would have undergone surgery, and what percentage of current cataract blindness would be alleviated, if females had the same cataract surgical coverage rates as males.

 

Results

Eight surveys in the literature met the inclusion criteria (Table 1). In addition, we included unpublished population-based data from our 1999 blindness survey of 1500 adults in the Lower Shire Valley, Malawi. One survey in Nepal was unusual in that, although they had population-based data on the number of operated cataracts, they extrapolated from a previous population-based survey to arrive at the current number of cataract blind (4). This survey is included in Table 1, but was not included in the meta-analysis because of its very large size and non-standard methods.

 

 

In all of the surveys, cataract surgical coverage rates were lower for females than males. The overall odds ratio for females (compared to males) in the meta-analysis was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.60—0.74). The data also indicate that women accounted for 63% (median) of all cataract cases in these populations, despite their lower coverage. If females had the same cataract surgical coverage as males, the median incidence of cataract blindness would be reduced by 12.5%.

 

Discussion

The study findings demonstrate that females do not receive cataract surgery at the same rate as males, and that closing the gender gap could significantly decrease the incidence of cataract blindness. Our findings are limited, in that the data are mostly from a few regions of Asia, with only two African countries and no Latin American countries represented. There are probably many reasons for the gender gap. In general, differences in surgical coverage rates could be attributed to gender-defined social roles, which could be confounded by socioeconomic factors, such as literacy, socioeconomic status and marital status. Documented reasons for low use of services vary by location, and include the following.

The cost of cataract surgery may be prohibitive. Costs include transportation to the hospital; loss of work for the patient or the guardian accompanying the patient; and living expenses for the guardian while the patient is in the hospital. Also, poor rural women often have less disposable income, or control of finances, than men (5).

Cataract surgery requires transport to a hospital. This reduces the use of cataract services by women because they are less likely than men to travel outside of their village for services (6).

The perceived "value" of cataract surgery is often gender-dependent (7). Research in Malawi showed that widowed females were more likely to have cataract surgery than married females, while the opposite was true for males (8). After divorce or widowhood, the probability that a woman would have surgery increased when there was a grown child or sibling to assist them in seeking surgery.

Community-based education about cataract has not been undertaken in most areas. When it is, the demand for surgery will increase, and women who meet other women who have had successful surgery are more like to accept surgery themselves (8). Currently, however, educational programmes are usually not gender-specific. Cataract programmes in which females have lower coverage rates than males should investigate other local barriers that might exist.

Surgery coverage rates can also vary by age group. In Nepal, males aged 65—74 years received 40% more surgery than females, while those older than 75 years of age received 70% more surgery than females (4). Information on cataract surgical coverage by age and sex was not available for the other surveys.

Cataract programmes should not assume that women have equal access to cataract surgery compared to men, just because women receive 50% of the surgery performed. Due to the higher prevalence of cataract in women (due to increased risk, as well as life expectancy), women will comprise approximately 60—70% of all cataract surgeries when coverage rates are equal (1). Although cataract surgical coverage rates have not been calculated for industrialized countries, data from the United States, Canada, Great Britain and Sweden indicate that women receive 60—70% of the cataract operations there (9—15).

While the cataract surgical coverage rate is a useful indicator, in survey reports this rate must be interpreted with caution. It is intended to measure the rate at which blinding cataract is operated, but in a survey it is generally not possible to determine if the operated patient was blind, or merely visually impaired. In the eight surveys we analysed, only one utilized records with preoperative visual acuity (4). However, in most of the other surveys (16—20 and Malawi), care was taken to categorize patients into two groups: those aphakic (or pseudophakic) in one eye, without blindness in the fellow eye; and those blind in the fellow eye. In our meta-analysis, patients in the former group were not counted as having their blindness cured by surgery. In contrast, patients with bilateral aphakia were presumed to have been blind preoperatively. While imperfect, this lessens the potential for overstating the cataract surgical coverage rate.

Varying definitions of cataract are often used, as they were in the meta-analysis surveys. Although this makes it impossible to compare absolute cataract surgery rates between surveys, it does not affect the validity of comparisons between male and female coverage rates within a survey.

It has also been proposed that the "sight restoration rate" be used to measure the cataract coverage rate. It is defined as the proportion of cataract operations that restore eyesight in bilaterally cataract blind people (3). In contrast, cataract surgical coverage rates do not take into account the outcome of the surgery, and most of the studies we analysed reported only whether cataract surgery was done, not whether it successfully restored sight. Fear of a poor outcome is sometimes a reason patients refuse cataract surgery. In India, the conversion from aphakic spectacles to intraocular lenses led to a significant increase in cataract surgical coverage (21). Recent research from Egypt has shown that women who have cataract surgery are three times less likely to have an intraocular lens implant compared to men. Furthermore, over 60% of aphakic men wore spectacles, compared to only 20% of aphakic women (Courtright P, unpublished data). In Saudi Arabia, 60% of males with refractive errors of all types wore spectacles, compared to only 14% of females (22). Multivariate analysis of a cataract surgical outcome study in India also showed that women had a 2.5-fold higher risk of a poor or very poor outcome (due to surgery-related causes or inadequate refractive correction) compared to men (23). Thus, it is possible that the sight restoration rate for women is lower than for men. In cultures in which women do not like to wear glasses, the conversion to high-quality surgery with intraocular lens may help increase uptake and outcome of cataract surgery among women.

Cataract surgical programmes need to consider gender when they evaluate their efforts. Goals for cataract surgical coverage rates should be set and analysed for males and females separately, and consideration should be given to targeting women specifically. This will necessitate investigating the local barriers that keep women from receiving surgery and designing programmes to overcome these.

 

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr Hans Limburg for comments on the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest: none declared.

 

 


Résumé

Inégalités entre hommes et femmes et utilisation des services de chirurgie de la cataracte dans les pays en développement

OBJECTIF: Déterminer, à partir des données publiées, les taux de couverture de la chirurgie de la cataracte selon le sexe et la proportion des cas de cécité due à la cataracte qui pourraient être éliminés si les femmes et les hommes avaient un accès égal aux services de chirurgie de la cataracte.
MÉTHODES: Une recherche documentaire a permis d'identifier des enquêtes sur la cataracte menées en population selon une méthodologie correcte. Les taux de couverture de la chirurgie de la cataracte ont été tirés des résultats des enquêtes et l'on a comparé les taux correspondant aux femmes et aux hommes. Les odds ratios ont été calculés selon la méthode de Peto pour chaque enquête et une méta-analyse a été réalisée sur l'ensemble des enquêtes.
RÉSULTATS: D'après un examen des données publiées et une méta- analyse des enquêtes sur la cataracte réalisées dans les pays en développement, nous avons trouvé un taux de couverture de la chirurgie de la cataracte 1,2-1,7 fois plus élevé pour les hommes que pour les femmes. Les femmes bénéficiaient de cette intervention avec un odds ratio de 0,67 (IC 95 % : 0,60-0,74) par rapport aux hommes. Bien que disposant d'un taux de couverture plus faible, elles représentaient environ 63 % de l'ensemble des cas de cataracte dans les populations étudiées, et si elles bénéficiaient d'une intervention chirurgicale aux mêmes taux que les hommes, la prévalence de la cécité due à la cataracte baisserait d'une valeur médiane de 12,5 % (intervalle : 4-21 %).
CONCLUSION: En réduisant les inégalités entre hommes et femmes, on pourrait faire baisser de façon significative la prévalence de la cécité due à la cataracte ; des programmes d'intervention tenant compte de ces inégalités sont par conséquent nécessaires pour améliorer le taux de couverture de la chirurgie de la cataracte chez les femmes.


Resumen

Género y uso de los servicios de cirugía de la catarata en los países en desarrollo

OBJETIVO: Determinar, a partir de la literatura existente, las tasas de cobertura de cirugía de la catarata por sexos, así como la proporción de casos de ceguera por catarata que podría evitarse si mujeres y hombres tuvieran idéntico acceso a esos servicios quirúrgicos.
MÉTODOS: La búsqueda realizada en la literatura permitió identificar diversos estudios poblacionales metodológicamente válidos sobre la catarata en los países en desarrollo. A partir de las tasas de cobertura quirúrgica de la catarata extraídas de esos estudios, se compararon las tasas correspondientes a las mujeres y las correspondientes a los hombres. Se calcularon las razones de posibilidades (OR) de Peto para cada estudio, y se efectuó un metaanálisis de todos los trabajos.
RESULTADOS: A partir de este examen y metaanálisis de los estudios sobre la catarata en los países en desarrollo, hallamos que la tasa de cobertura quirúrgica de la catarata era 1,2—1,7 veces mayor para los hombres que para las mujeres. En éstas, la OR para el hecho de ser intervenida quirúrgicamente fue de 0,67 (IC95%: 0,6—0,74). Pese a su menor tasa de cobertura, las mujeres explicaban aproximadamente el 63% de todos los casos de catarata en las poblaciones estudiadas, y si se sometieran a cirugía a las mismas tasas que los hombres la prevalencia de ceguera por catarata se reduciría en un 12,5% como mediana (intervalo: 4%— 21%).
CONCLUSIÓN: La supresión de las diferencias por razón de género podría traducirse por tanto en una disminución significativa de la prevalencia de ceguera por catarata. Hacen falta programas de intervención atentos al género para mejorar la cobertura quirúrgica de la catarata entre las mujeres.


 

 

References

1. Abou-Gareeb I, Lewallen S, Bassett K, Courtright P. Gender and blindness: a meta-analysis of population-based prevalence surveys. Ophthalmic Epidemiology 2001;8:39-56.        [ Links ]

2. Brilliant GE. The epidemiology of blindness in Nepal: report of the 1981 Nepal Blindness Survey. Berkeley: The Seva Foundation; 1988.        [ Links ]

3. Limburg H, Kumar R, Bachani D. Monitoring and evaluating cataract intervention in India. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1996;80:951-5.        [ Links ]

4. Marseille E, Brand R. The distribution of cataract surgery services in a public health eye care program in Nepal. Health Policy 1997;42:117-33.        [ Links ]

5. Brilliant GE, Brilliant LB. Using social epidemiology to understand who stays blind and who gets operated for cataract in a rural setting. Social Science and Medicine 1985;21:553-8.        [ Links ]

6. Gupta SK, Murthy GVS. Distances travelled to reach surgical eye camps. World Health Forum 1995;16:180-1.        [ Links ]

7. Fletcher AE, Donoghue M, Devavaram J, Thulasiraj RD, Scott S, Abdalla M, et al. Low uptake of eye services in rural India: a challenge for programmes of blindness prevention. Archives of Ophthalmology 1999;117:1393-9.        [ Links ]

8. Courtright P, Kanjaloti S, Lewallen S. Barriers to acceptance of cataract surgery among patients presenting to district hospitals in rural Malawi. Tropical and Geographical Medicine 1995;47:15-8.        [ Links ]

9. Klein BE, Klein R, Moss SE. Incident cataract surgery. The Beaver Dam eye study. Ophthalmology 1997;104:573-80.        [ Links ]

10. Javitt JC, Kendix M, Tielsch JM, Steinwachs DM, Schein OD, Kolb MM, et al. Geographic variation in utilization of cataract surgery. Medical Care 1995;33:90-105.        [ Links ]

11. Baratz KH, Gray DT, Hodge DO, Butterfield LC, Ilstrup DM. Cataract extraction rates in Olmstead County, Minnesota 1980 through 1994. Archives of Ophthalmology 1997;115:1441-6.        [ Links ]

12. Meddings D. The eyes have it: cataract surgery and changing patterns of outpatient surgery. Medical Care Research Reviews 1997;54:286-300.        [ Links ]

13. Desai P, Reidy A, Minassian DC. Profile of patients presenting for cataract surgery in the UK: national data collection. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1999;83:893-6.        [ Links ]

14. Williams ES, Seward HC. Cataract surgery in South West Thames region: an analysis of age-adjusted surgery rates and length of stay by district. Public Health 1993;107:441-9.        [ Links ]

15. Monestam E, Wachtmeister L. Cataract surgery from a gender perspective — a population based study in Sweden. Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavia 1998;76:711-6.        [ Links ]

16. Li S, Xu J, He M, Wu K, Munoz SR, Ellwein LB. A survey of blindness and cataract surgery in Doumen county, China. Ophthalmology 1999;106:1602-8.        [ Links ]

17. Zhao J, Jia L, Sui R, Ellwein LB. Prevalence of blindness and cataract surgery in Shunyi county, China. American Journal of Ophthalmology 1998;126:506-14.        [ Links ]

18. Pokharel GP, Regmi G, Shrestha SK, Negrel AD, Ellwein LB. Prevalence of blindness and cataract surgery in Nepal. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1998;82:600-5.        [ Links ]

19. Limburg H, Vaidyanathan K, Pampattiwar KN. Cataract blindness on the rise? Results of a door-to-door examination in Mohadi. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 1996,44:241-4.        [ Links ]

20. Limburg H, Kumar R. Follow-up study of blindness attributed to cataract in Karnataka State, India. Ophthalmic Epidemiology 1998;5:211-23.        [ Links ]

21. Vaidyanathan K, Limburg H, Foster A, Pandey RM. Changing trends in barriers to cataract surgery in India. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 1999;77:104-9.        [ Links ]

22. Tabbarra KF, Ross-Degnan D. Blindness in Saudi Arabia. Journal of the American Medical Association 1986; 255:3378-84.        [ Links ]

23. Dandona L, Dandona R, Naduvilath TJ, McCarty CA, Mandal P, Srinivas M, et al. Population-based assessment of the outcome of cataract surgery in an urban population in Southern India. American Journal of Ophthalmology 1999;127:650-8.        [ Links ]

24. Bucher PJM, Ijselmuiden CB. Prevalence and causes of blindness in the Northern Transvaal. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1988;72:721-6.        [ Links ]

 

 

1British Columbia Centre for Epidemiologic and International Ophthalmology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. Correspondence should be addressed to Dr Lewallen, Kilimanjaro Centre for Community Ophthalmology, Tumaini University, PO Box 2254, Moshi, United Republic of Tanzania (email: kcco@kilionline.com).

Ref. No. 00-1020