Print version ISSN 0042-9686
Bull World Health Organ vol.90 n.11 Genebra Nov. 2012
Parental perceptions surrounding polio and self-reported non-participation in polio supplementary immunization activities in Karachi, Pakistan: a mixed methods study
Perceptions parentales relatives à la polio et non-participation autodéclarée aux activités de vaccination supplémentaires contre la polio à Karachi, au Pakistan: une étude des méthodes mixtes
Las percepciones de los padres en torno a la poliomielitis y la no participación notificada por los mismos en las actividades suplementarias de inmunización antipoliomielítica en Karachi, Pakistán: un estudio de métodos mixtos
Asif Raza KhowajaI; Sher Ali KhanI; Naveeda NizamI; Saad Bin OmerII; Anita ZaidiI,*
IAga Khan University, Stadium Road, PO Box 3500, Karachi, 74800, Pakistan
IISchools of Public Health and Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, United States of America
OBJECTIVE: To assess parent's knowledge and perceptions surrounding polio and polio vaccination, self-reported participation in polio supplementary immunization activities (SIAs) targeting children aged < 5 years, and reasons for non-participation.
METHODS: The mixed methods study began with a cross-sectional survey in Karachi, Pakistan. A structured questionnaire was administered to assess parental knowledge of polio and participation in polio SIAs conducted in September and October 2011. Additionally, 30 parents of Pashtun ethnicity (a high-risk group) who refused to vaccinate their children were interviewed in depth to determine why. Descriptive and bivariate analyses by ethnic and socioeconomic group were performed for quantitative data; thematic analysis was conducted for qualitative interviews with Pashtun parents.
FINDINGS: Of 1017 parents surveyed, 412 (41%) had never heard of polio; 132 (13%) did not participate in one SIA and 157 (15.4%) did not participate in either SIA. Among non-participants, 34 (21.6%) reported not having been contacted by a vaccinator; 116 (73.9%) reported having refused to participate, and 7 (4.5%) reported that the child was absent from home when the vaccinator visited. Refusals clustered in low-income Pashtun (43/441; 9.8%) and high-income families of any ethnic background (71/153; 46.4%). Low-income Pashtuns were more likely to not have participated in polio SIAs than low-income non-Pashtuns (odds ratio, OR: 7.1; 95% confidence interval, CI: 3.4714.5). Reasons commonly cited among Pashtuns for refusing vaccination included fear of sterility; lack of faith in the polio vaccine; scepticism about the vaccination programme, and fear that the vaccine might contain religiously forbidden ingredients.
CONCLUSION: In Karachi, interruption of polio transmission requires integrated and participatory community interventions targeting high-risk populations.
OBJECTIF: Évaluer les connaissances et les perceptions des parents relatives à la polio et à la vaccination contre la polio, la participation autodéclarée à des activités de vaccination supplémentaires (AVS) contre la polio ciblant des enfants âgés de moins de 5 ans, mais aussi les raisons justifiant la non-participation.
MÉTHODES: L'étude des méthodes mixtes a commencé par une enquête transversale à Karachi, au Pakistan. Un questionnaire structuré a été distribué afin d'évaluer les connaissances parentales relatives à la polio et à la participation aux AVS contre la polio, en septembre et octobre 2011. En outre, 30 parents d'origine ethnique pachtoune (un groupe à haut risque) ayant refusé de faire vacciner leurs enfants ont été interrogés de manière approfondie afin de déterminer les raisons de leur refus. Des analyses descriptives et bivariées par groupe ethnique et groupe socio-économique ont été réalisées pour les données quantitatives. Et une analyse thématique des entretiens qualitatifs avec les parents pachtounes a été effectuée.
RÉSULTATS: Sur 1017 parents interrogés, 412 (41%) n'avaient jamais entendu parler de la polio, 132 (13%) n'avaient pas participé à une AVS et 157 (15,4%) n'avaient participé à aucune AVS. Parmi les non-participants, 34 (21,6%) ont déclaré ne pas avoir été contactés par un vaccinateur, 116 (73,9%) ont déclaré avoir refusé de participer, et 7 (4,5%) ont déclaré que l'enfant n'était pas à la maison lors de la visite du vaccinateur. Les refus se concentraient dans les familles pachtounes à faible revenu (43/441; 9,8%) et dans celles à revenu élevé de toute origine ethnique (71/153; 46,4%). Les Pachtounes possédant un faible revenu étaient plus susceptibles de ne pas avoir participé à des AVS contre la polio que les non-Pachtounes possédant un faible revenu (rapport des cotes, RC: 7,1; intervalle de confiance, IC de 95%: 3,47 à 14,5). Les raisons souvent citées par les Pachtounes pour le refus de la vaccination incluaient la peur de la stérilité, le manque de confiance dans le vaccin contre la polio, le scepticisme à l'égard du programme de vaccination et la crainte que le vaccin puisse contenir des ingrédients interdits par la religion.
CONCLUSION: À Karachi, l'interruption de la transmission de la polio nécessite des interventions communautaires intégrées et participatives, ciblant les populations à risque élevé.
OBJETIVO: Evaluar el conocimiento y las percepciones de los padres en torno a la poliomielitis y la vacuna antipoliomielítica, la participación en las actividades suplementarias de inmunización antipoliomielítica (ASI) para niños menores de 5 años y las razones por las que no se participó en ellas.
MÉTODOS: El estudio de métodos mixtos comenzó con una encuesta transversal en Karachi, Pakistán. Se proporcionó un cuestionario estructurado para evaluar el conocimiento de los padres acerca de la poliomielitis y la participación en ASI antipoliomielíticas llevadas a cabo en septiembre y octubre de 2011. Con objeto de determinar el porqué, se entrevistaron de manera adicional a 30 padres de etnia pastún (grupo de alto riesgo) que se negaron a vacunar a sus hijos. Se llevaron a cabo análisis descriptivos y divariados según el grupo étnico y socioeconómico para obtener datos cuantitativos y se realizaron análisis temáticos para obtener entrevistas cualitativas con padres de etnia pastún.
RESULTADOS: De los 1017 padres encuestados, 412 (41%) nunca habían oído hablar de la poliomielitis, 132 (13%) no habían participado en una ASI y 157 (15,4%) no habían participado en ninguna ASI. Entre los que no habían participado, 34 (21,6%) notificaron que el vacunador no se había puesto en contacto con ellos, 116 (73,9%) informaron que se habían negado a participar y 7 (4,5%) que el niño no estaba en casa cuando el vacunador realizó la visita. Las negativas se agruparon en las familias pastunes con ingresos bajos (43/441; 9,8%) y familias con ingresos altos de cualquier grupo étnico (71/153; 46,4%). La probabilidad de que los pastunes con ingresos bajos no hubieran participado en ASI antipoliomielíticas fue más alta que entre los grupos no pastunes con ingresos bajos (razón de posibilidades, OR: 7,1; intervalo de confianza (CI) del 95%: 3,4714,5). Las razones citadas más comúnmente entre los pastunes para rechazar la vacunación incluyeron el temor a quedar estériles, la falta de confianza en la vacuna antipoliomielítica, el escepticismo acerca del programa de inmunización y el temor a que la vacuna pudiera contener ingredientes prohibidos por su religión.
CONCLUSIÓN: La interrupción de la transmisión de la poliomielitis en Karachi exige intervenciones comunitarias integradas y participativas que tengan como objetivo las poblaciones de alto riesgo.
Pakistan is one of only three endemic countries in the world still struggling to interrupt poliovirus transmission and meet the target of global polio eradication by 2012. Polio supplementary immunization activities (SIAs) for the home delivery of oral polio vaccine (OPV) were initiated in the country in 2000, when 119 cases of polio were reported. Although the number of cases declined to 32 in 2007, it has been rising steadily since 2008.1 In 2011 Pakistan reported the world's highest number of polio cases and some fear the country may become the last remaining host of polio on earth. The situation clearly poses a serious threat to the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI).24 In Pakistan, elimination efforts have largely relied on a robust case detection system based on surveillance of acute flaccid paralysis cases and on mass door-to-door polio SIAs, of which more than 100 have been conducted since the year 2000.5,6 Every child less than 5 years of age who resides in Pakistan has to be reached during each SIA, since multiple doses of OPV are needed in countries with high endemicity for children to develop adequate immunity against polio.1-4 SIAs can vary in frequency but are usually held one to two months apart.
SIAs against polio are primarily organized by government officials with support from United Nations partners, mainly the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). SIAs are intended to complement, not replace, routine immunization against polio. They aim to interrupt poliovirus circulation through administration of the oral polio vaccine (OPV) to every child aged < 5 years in every vaccine SIA campaign, irrespective of immunization history.7 Public announcements through media coverage, posters and banners are used to create awareness about upcoming polio SIAs and encourage participation. Social marketing and community mobilization efforts are organized by UNICEF, and the staff of WHO's Polio Eradication Initiative assist local health officials in organizing, implementing and monitoring SIAs. A large cadre of vaccinators, health workers and community volunteers administer OPV to eligible children through visits to all households and at fixed health facilities.7,8
Although high coverage (> 90%) during polio SIAs has been reported in Pakistan, actual coverage is questionable. An official report of the Independent Monitoring Board of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative published in February 2012 highlighted major planning and execution gaps for polio SIAs in Pakistan.3 Several factors have made the goal of eliminating polio in Pakistan elusive. These include inconsistent quality of SIAs; failure to immunize children in many areas; inaccessibility of children due to ongoing military conflict; massive floods; poor routine immunization services; a structurally weak polio eradication programme; large nomadic and internally-displaced populations, and the refusal of some parents to have their children vaccinated.9,10 Many of these factors have led to the clustering of unimmunized children, who are at high risk of getting polio.11
Very few studies evaluating the results of polio SIAs in Karachi have been published. We chose Karachi for our study because polio is endemic in the city and the risk of transmission is among the highest in Pakistan. Karachi is, in fact, the only megacity in the world that has not yet succeeded in interrupting polio transmission. Besides, its population represents all ethnic groups in Pakistan. Given Karachi's large cultural and ethnic diversity, we studied a large representative sample of individuals living across the city, our objective being to assess parents' knowledge about polio, rates of non-participation in polio SIAs and reasons for non-participation. We ensured adequate representation of the Pashtun community, a group that comprises an estimated 3540% of Karachi's population and yet has suffered 90% of recent polio cases in the city. This community has high rates of migration and displacement and low rates of polio vaccination.12
Data collection for our study, which had a mixed methods design, was completed in three months (November 2011to January 2012). The quantitative component of the study involved a cross-sectional cluster survey in Karachi, a megacity comprising 18 towns, 1 cantonment and 178 localities known as union councils.13 The sampling frame, developed for our previous vaccine research, consisted of 90 randomly selected clusters with a total population of 200 000 and between 200 and 250 households each. The sample was sociodemographically representative of the entire population of Karachi.14 From this sampling frame we selected 60 clusters of low- and middle-income households. Using the probability proportionate to size technique, we calculated the number of households we would need to survey within each cluster. Table 1 shows the 18 towns and one cantonment area that make up Karachi and the number and fraction of households sampled in each town.
In our previous work we had difficulty accessing households in affluent areas of Karachi because of tight security measures. For this reason, in the current study we selected five large shopping malls as sites for approaching and interviewing the members of affluent families from different high-income areas of the city. In total, 153 eligible families approximately 15% of the proportionally representative sampling frame were interviewed in malls. We posed no income- or asset-related questions to avoid affecting the response rate, but these malls, considered safe, have reserved rights of admission and are visited by affluent families for entertainment and shopping. Thus, people who frequent them are broadly representative of the upper classes.
We estimated the sample size using the formula for cross-sectional prevalence studies; we assumed a 30% rate of non-participation in polio SIAs, a 5% non-response rate, a 5% margin of error and a design effect of 2.0 for cluster sampling. We inflated the resulting sample size, 646, by 50% to ensure a large enough sampling of Pashtun households to allow us to evaluate any differences among ethnic groups in lack of participation in polio SIAs. This yielded a final sample of 1001 households.
Parents were eligible to participate in the survey if they were residents of Karachi and had children aged < 5 years in their household. Verbal consent was obtained from all parents who participated in the survey. We developed a structured questionnaire and pilot tested it in households drawn from neighbouring clusters. The questionnaire included questions on demographics, knowledge about the symptoms of polio, and number of polio SIAs in which parents had participated in the two most recent months. Two SIAs were held in Karachi (September and October 2011) just before the survey. To select the households to be surveyed, trained project staff (research assistants and field workers) spun a bottle in the main street of each town to choose the direction in which to approach the first household and then used systematic random sampling with a skip pattern of two after each eligible dwelling to select the remaining households. Any parent available (mother or father of a child < 5 years old) was interviewed. In shopping malls, research assistants invited families to participate in the survey if they reported having children aged < 5 years and living in a high-income part of the city (Defence Housing Authority, Clifton, Gulshan-e-Iqbal and North Nazimabad). A senior research assistant made spot-check visits to homes and malls and re-interviewed 5% of the respondents to ensure the quality of data collection.
For the qualitative assessment, parents who refused to have their children receive the OPV or who reported that their eligible children did not participate in the two most recent polio SIAs were purposively selected from the Pashtun population and invited for in-depth interviews. Only ethnic Pashtuns were interviewed because migration and displacement are common among them and their children have the highest rate of confirmed cases of polio in Pakistan and the highest risk among all ethnic groups. Only fathers were interviewed because they are the main decision-makers in Pashtun families. A native Pashto-speaking male medical student (SAK in his final year was trained to conduct these interviews. Data saturation was reached after 30 in-depth interviews. Written notes were transcribed and thematic analysis was conducted on emerging themes surrounding the reasons for children not having received or having refused to receive the OPV. The survey data were entered electronically in real time and analysed on SPSS version 19 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, United States of America).
Descriptive analysis was performed and proportions were compared for three groups: (i) low-income Pashtun families; (ii) low-income families of other ethnicities (non-Pashtun); and (iii) middle- and high-income families of any ethnic background. Income group was based on area of residence (Table 1). Differences between these groups in terms of knowledge about polio, participation in SIAs and reasons for non-participation are expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). This study received ethical approval from the ethics review committee of Aga Khan University in Karachi.
A total of 2149 parents were approached at households in the community and shopping malls, and 1116 were found eligible to participate in the study. Among eligible parents, 51 (5.6%) and 48 (24%) refused to participate in households and at malls, respectively (Fig. 1). Of the 1017 parents who agreed to participate, about 90% were mothers of the children aged < 5 years; 441 (43.4%), 423 (41.6%) and 153 (15%) of the respective families were categorized as low-income Pashtun, low-income non-Pashtun, or middle- or high-income, regardless of ethnic background.
The children were 3.2 years old on average (standard deviation, SD: ± 1.5); 52% were male and 48% were female. Of the parents interviewed, 412 (40.5%) reported never having heard about "polio disease" (Table 2) and 246 (24%) reported not having heard about recent polio SIAs in their area in 2011; of parents in this last group, 193 (78% of the parents interviewed) belonged to low-income Pashtun households. Only 728 (72%) parents reported that their children had participated in both the September and October polio SIAs; 157 (15.4%) reported that their children had not participated in either SIA. There were 34 (21.6%) parents who reported having had no contact with a vaccinator in their home, 116 (73.9%) reported having refused the vaccination and 7 (4.5%) said that their child was not at home when the vaccinator had visited (Table 3). Refusals clustered in low-income Pashtun (43/441; 9.8%) and high-income (71/153; 46.4%) populations, whereas low- and middle-income non-Pashtun populations had high rates of SIA participation, with only 2% (9/423) having received no dose of OPV in both polio SIA campaigns. Pashtun parents stated as the primary reasons for refusing to have their children vaccinated fear of potential harm from the OPV (16%) and lack of permission from family elders (77%). Among high-income respondents interviewed in malls, the main reason given was the belief that the vaccine was harmful (72%) or unnecessary (8.5%) (Table 4). Vaccine refusal rates in the 18 towns and one cantonment of Karachi ranged between 0% and 70%, with the highest refusal rates reported from the high-income areas of Defence Housing Authority and Clifton (Table 1).
Significant differences in knowledge about polio and in participation in SIAs were observed between low-income Pashtuns and low-income non-Pashtuns (Table 5). The odds of knowing nothing about polio were 2.2 (95% CI: 1.14.3) times greater among low-income Pashtun parents than among low-income non-Pashtuns (Table 5). Low-income Pashtun parents were 6 times (95% CI: 4.38.8) more likely to have never heard about a polio SIA campaign in their area than low-income non-Pashtuns. Moreover, children of low-income Pashtun parents were 7 times (95% CI: 3.514.5) more likely to have failed to participate in polio SIAs than children of low-income non-Pashtun parents.
In-depth interviews revealed parental perceptions surrounding polio and polio vaccination and why some children did not received the OPV during the two most recent polio SIAs. Most of the parents thought that the polio vaccine caused sterility in adulthood. Some also considered polio vaccination campaigns to be part of a conspiracy against Muslim nations, including Pakistan. "Polio vaccine is prepared in the West and sent here. It is then given to our children in order to destroy their ability to reproduce in the future." Moreover, about one third of the parents reported "no belief" in the polio vaccine and considered it useless or ineffective against polio. "It is of no good, because one of my friends has polio even though he was vaccinated against it." Other parents felt that since their children had received several doses of polio vaccine in the past, they did not need to get vaccinated again. Some voiced doubts about the government's "disguised policy" of conducting exhaustive efforts against polio. "Why do the government and health system give so much emphasis to polio vaccine? There are so many other diseases that should be addressed first. There must be some other reason (negative reason) for their giving so much importance to polio vaccine." Another important theme was concern that the vaccine could contain religiously forbidden "non-halal" ingredients. "I was allowing my children to receive polio vaccine until last year, when I learnt that the material used is un-Islamic (haraam).... if we are given proof that this material is not haraam, then we will allow our children for polio vaccine." A few parents also mentioned other reasons, including a bad cold chain, difficulty in communicating with the polio vaccinator because of a language barrier and fear of side-effects (fever, bloating of skin, weakness, etc.).
In Karachi, parental refusal was the most common reason given for the failure of children to participate in the two most recent polio vaccine SIAs. It accounted for non-participation in 74% of the cases. A clustering of vaccine refusals among ethnic low-income Pashtun and high-income populations was noted and varied by town. Lack of knowledge about polio, lack of faith in the vaccine's effectiveness, misperceptions about vaccine-related adverse events (e.g. infertility) and mistrust among Pashtuns make it highly likely that poliovirus transmission will continue in this population unless specific targeted activities are undertaken to promote vaccination.
Our overall findings pertaining to why some parents refuse to have their children vaccinated are in line with those of previous studies that have identified misperceptions regarding disease susceptibility and vaccine efficacy and concerns about safety.15,16 Moreover, lack of trust in vaccines and in those who deliver them (e.g. health-care providers, governments and international agencies) has been identified as an important hindrance to routine OPV immunization and polio elimination.17,18
This study was undertaken in the wake of extensive media reports of an allegedly fake vaccination campaign organized by the United States Central Intelligence Agency to try to track down Osama Bin Laden by surreptitiously obtaining blood samples from his family members for deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) testing. The campaign was run by a Pashtun government physician from the tribal area of Khyber Agency who had worked in polio vaccine campaigns.19,20 Although we prudently avoided explicit references to this in our in-depth interviews, several Pashtun families gave distrust of government-run programmes as the reason for having refused to get their children vaccinated. The publicity surrounding the bogus vaccination campaign is probably not the only reason for people's mistrust of the polio vaccine, since vaccine refusals had been documented in the Pashtun population even before the incident. However, reports of the incident may have reinforced or perpetuated negative perceptions. The long-term impact of this incident on polio eradication efforts in Pakistan remains to be determined.
At the community level, conventional communication efforts surrounding polio are largely conducted by female workers or mobilizers who primarily target adult females in the households.21 Male family decision-makers or community and religious leaders are insufficiently engaged and are usually absent during the day time when vaccinators visit households.22 In Pashtun populations in particular males are the primary decision-makers. They have strong religious beliefs and are key to polio eradication efforts. Our interviews showed that religious authorities of two or three of the main religious institutions (madrassahs) heavily influence the opinions of Pashtun men in Karachi. To enhance social mobilization, integrated participatory interventions targeting communities at high risk for polio need to be implemented.23,24 These interventions should include parental counselling, targeted particularly at male decision-makers; the creation of community networks involving trusted religious authorities, and role modelling by parents who approve of the polio vaccine. The strategy of involving religious opinion leaders in efforts to increase acceptance of polio immunization has already been employed in northern India and Nigeria.11,25 More formative and evaluative research is needed to identify the most effective strategies.
A high proportion (24%) of eligible high-income families declined to participate in the survey at malls primarily because of "lack of time". Worth noting is the fact that vaccination refusal rates were high among those who did participate in the survey. The upper class has little trust in government services and seeks health care and immunization services in the private sector. Evidence suggests that the high-income population is adequately immunized and that most children in this group have received injectable and oral polio vaccines through private paediatric practices (Zaidi AK, unpublished data). Although children from high-income families are at little risk of contracting polio, the widespread belief in this social group that repeat doses of OPV are harmful may undermine the overall success of the polio eradication programme, since the wealthy are often opinion leaders and trendsetters.2628
This is the first study to identify the main perceptions associated with lack of participation in polio SIAs in the ethnic group with the highest polio incidence in Pakistan. This high-risk group needs targeted educational messages and we believe that our findings will contribute to their development. Operational research on increasing polio vaccine acceptance by offering packages of health and non-health interventions during polio SIA campaigns should also be explored.
Although our study was conducted in Karachi, some findings may be generalizable to other parts of Pakistan that are important for polio eradication efforts, since outside Karachi endemic polio transmission is primarily restricted to Pashtun majority areas.
Competing interests: None declared.
1. Global polio emergency action plan 201213: getting Nigeria, Pakistan and Afghanistan back on track. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. Available from: http://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2012/april/Working_draft_Global_PolioEmergencyActionPlan_04_April_v2.pdf [accessed 10 August 2012] [ Links ].
2. Weekly AFP surveillance update, Pakistan, week 52. Islamabad: World Health Organization; 2011. [ Links ]
3. Ten months and counting (report of the Independent Monitoring Board of the Global Polio Eradication Initiative). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. Available from: www.polioeradication.org/portals/0/.../imbreport_january2012.pdf [accessed 30 August 2012] [ Links ].
4. Wise J. Final push is needed to tackle last 1% of polio. BMJ 2011;343:d4685. doi:10.1136/bmj.d4685 PMID:21778199 [ Links ]
5. Abid N, Islam OU, Bosan A, Darwish A, Bile KM. Pakistan's fight against poliomyelitis: introducing innovative strategies to address challenges and attain the goal of eradication. East Mediterr Health J 2010;16(Suppl):S514. PMID:21495583 [ Links ]
6. Ahmad K. Pakistan struggles to eradicate polio. Lancet Infect Dis 2007;7:247. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70066-X PMID:17419137 [ Links ]
7. Supplementary immunization [Internet]. Geneva: Global Polio Eradication Initiative, World Health Organization; 2010. Available from: http://www.polioeradication.org/Aboutus/Strategy/Supplementaryimmunization.aspx [accessed 10 August 2012] [ Links ].
8. Key elements for improving supplementary immunization activities for polio eradication. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000. Available from: http://www.who.int/vaccines-documents/DocsPDF00/www537.pdf [accessed 10 August 2012] [ Links ].
9. Nishtar S. Pakistan, politics and polio. Bull World Health Organ 2010;88:15960. doi:10.2471/BLT.09.066480 PMID:20428374 [ Links ]
10. Shah M, Khan MK, Shakeel S, Mahmood F, Sher Z, Sarwar MB et al. Resistance of polio to its eradication in Pakistan. Virol J 2011;8:457. doi:10.1186/1743-422X-8-457 PMID:21962145 [ Links ]
11. Chaturvedi S, Dasgupta R, Adhish V, Ganguly KK, Rai S, Sushant L et al. Deconstructing social resistance to pulse polio campaign in two north Indian districts. Indian Pediatr 2009;46:96374. PMID:19736365 [ Links ]
12. Baloch S. Global polio emergency might be declared in Pakistan in 3 months. The Express Tribune. 27 March 2012. Available from: http://tribune.com.pk/story/355608/global-polio-emergency-might-be-declared-in-pakistan-in-3-months/ [accessed 30 August 2012] [ Links ].
14. Sheikh S, Ali A, Zaidi AKM, Agha A, Khowaja A, Allana S et al. Measles susceptibility in children in Karachi, Pakistan. Vaccine 2011;29:341923. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.02.087 PMID:21396902 [ Links ]
15. Esteves-Jaramillo A, Omer SB, Gonzalez-Diaz E, Salmon DA, Hixson B, Navarro F et al. Acceptance of a vaccine against novel influenza A (H1N1) virus among health care workers in two major cities in Mexico. Arch Med Res 2009;40:70511. doi:10.1016/j.arcmed.2010.01.004 PMID:20304260 [ Links ]
16. Salmon DA, Moulton LH, Omer SB, DeHart MP, Stokley S, Halsey NA et al. Factors associated with refusal of childhood vaccines among parents of school-aged children: a case-control study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:4706. doi:10.1001/archpedi.159.5.470 PMID:15867122 [ Links ]
17. Larson HJ, Cooper LZ, Eskola J, Katz SL, Ratzan S. Addressing the vaccine confidence gap. Lancet 2011;378:52635. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60678-8 PMID:21664679 [ Links ]
18. Larsen HJ, Ghinai I. Lessons from polio eradication. Nature 2011;473:4467. doi:10.1038/473446a PMID:21614056 [ Links ]
19. Shah S. US pressures Islamabad to free doctor who helped CIA track down Bin Laden. The Guardian. 12 July 2012. Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/12/us-pressures-islamabad-cia-doctor [accessed 30 August 2012] [ Links ].
20. Doctor who helped track bin Laden sacked. Dawn.com Pakistan. 29 March 2012. Available from: http://dawn.com/2012/03/29/doctor-who-helped-track-bin-laden-sacked [accessed 30 August 2012] [ Links ].
21. Evaluation of social mobilization activities for polio eradication. Islamabad: SoSec Study; 2005. [ Links ]
22. Obregón R, Chitnis K, Morry C, Feek W, Bates J, Galway M et al. Achieving polio eradication: a review of health communication evidence and lessons learned in India and Pakistan. Bull World Health Organ 2009;87:62430. doi:10.2471/BLT.08.060863 PMID:19705014 [ Links ]
23. Azmat SK. Mobilizing male opinion leaders' support for family planning to improve maternal health: a theory-based qualitative study from Pakistan. J Multidiscip Healthc 2011;4:42131. doi:10.2147/JMDH.S24341 PMID:22247617 [ Links ]
24. Bhutta ZA. The last mile in global poliomyelitis eradication. Lancet 2011;378:54952. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60744-7 PMID:21664681 [ Links ]
25. Renne E. Perspectives on polio and immunization in Northern Nigeria. Soc Sci Med 2006;63:185769. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.04.025 PMID:16765498 [ Links ]
26. Expert offers to drink 20 vials of expired polio drops to prove point. The Express Tribune. 22 February 2012. Available from: http://tribune.com.pk/story/339864/expert-offers-to-drink-20-vials-of-expired-polio-drops-to-prove-point/ [accessed 30 August 2012] [ Links ].
27. Nasir A. Rating race, politics may hit anti-polio drive. Dawn.com Sci-Tech. 16 February 2012. Available from: http://dawn.com/2012/02/16/ratings-race-politics-may-hit-anti-polio-drive/ [accessed 30 August 2012] [ Links ].
28. Rana S. Globally-supported company is funding fatal polio shots. The Express Tribune. 17 November 2011. Available from: http://tribune.com.pk/story/293191/vaccine-nation-globally-supported-company-is-funding-fatal-polio-shots/ [accessed 30 August 2012] [ Links ].
(Submitted: 14 April 2012 Revised version received: 22 August 2012 Accepted: 23 August 2012 Published online: 14 September 2012 )