Post-COVID-19 syndrome: persistent symptoms, functional impact, quality of life, return to work, and indirect costs - a prospective case study 12 months after COVID-19 infection

Fernando Shizuo Ida Hebert Pereira Ferreira Ana Karla Mendonça Vasconcelos Iris Aline Brito Furtado Cristina Janaina Pinheiro Morais Fontenele Antonio Carlos Pereira About the authors

Abstract

The persistent symptoms of post-COVID-19 syndrome negatively impact health, quality of life, and productivity. This study aimed to describe the persistent symptoms of post-COVID-19 syndrome (especially neurological ones) and their 12-month post-infection cognitive, emotional, motor, quality of life, and indirect cost repercussions. Patients showing the first symptoms of COVID-19 from January to June 2021 who developed post-COVID-19 syndrome and sought care at the Fortaleza Unit (Ceará, Brazil) of the SARAH Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals were included in this study. Information was obtained at the baseline follow-up and by telephone interview 12 months post-infection. In total, 58 people participated in this study with an average age of 52.8±10.5 years, of which 60% required an ICU. The most frequent symptoms on admission included fatigue (64%), arthralgia (51%), and dyspnea (47%), whereas, after 12 months, fatigue (46%) and memory impairment (39%). The following scales/functional tests showed alterations: PCFS, MoCA, HAD, FSS, SF-36, TLS5x, timed up and go, 6-minute walk, and handgrip. Indirect costs totaled USD 227,821.00, with 11,653 days of absenteeism. Moreover, 32% of patients were unable to return to work. Better TLS5x and higher SF-36 scores in the functional capacity, physical functioning, vitality, and pain dimensions were associated with return to work (p ≤ 0.05). The most frequent persistent symptoms referred to fatigue, arthralgia, dyspnea, anxiety, and depression, which negatively affected cognitive, emotional, and motor function and quality of life. These symptoms lasted for over a year, especially fatigue and memory alteration, the latter of which being the most reported after COVID-19 infections. Results also show a significant difficulty returning to work and indirect costs of USD 4,847.25 per person/year.

Keywords:
COVID-19; Functional Status; Quality of Life; Costs and Cost Analysis; Absenteeism


Introduction

Post-COVID-19 syndrome is defined as a symptom constellation during or after COVID-19 infections that persists for more than 12 weeks and are insufficiently explained by alternative diagnoses 11. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. COVID-19 rapid guideline: managing the long-term effects of COVID-19. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng188 (accessed on 08/Feb/2023).
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng188...
.

Studies have shown incidence rates of post-COVID-19 syndrome with different examination and follow-up times after acute infections. Tenforde et al. 22. Tenforde MW, Kim SS, Lindsell CJ, Billig Rose E, Shapiro NI, Files DC, et al. Symptom duration and risk factors for delayed return to usual health among outpatients with COVID-19 in a multistate health care systems network - United States, March-June 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020; 69:993-8. estimated that more than 30% of individuals affected by COVID-19 developed post-COVID-19 syndrome (including asymptomatic cases), whereas Huang et al. 33. Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Gu X, et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. Lancet 2021; 397:220-32. found the syndrome in 80% of hospitalized patients.

A wide range of persistent symptoms have been identified after mild and severe cases of COVID-19 infection 44. Malik P, Patel K, Pinto C, Jaiswal R, Tirupathi R, Pillai S, et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL): a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol 2022; 94:253-62., of which the most commonly reported include fatigue, dyspnea, anosmia, sleep disorders, arthralgia, headaches, cough, memory alterations, and impaired mental health 33. Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Gu X, et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. Lancet 2021; 397:220-32.,44. Malik P, Patel K, Pinto C, Jaiswal R, Tirupathi R, Pillai S, et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL): a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol 2022; 94:253-62.,55. Garrigues E, Janvier P, Kherabi Y, Le Bot A, Hamon A, Gouze H, et al. Post-discharge persistent symptoms and health-related quality of life after hospitalization for COVID-19. J Infect 2020; 81:e4-6.,66. Carfì A, Bernabei R, Landi F. Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19. JAMA 2020; 324:603-5.,77. Halpin SJ, McIvor C, Whyatt G, Adams A, Harvey O, McLean L, et al. Postdischarge symptoms and rehabilitation needs in survivors of COVID-19 infection: a cross-sectional evaluation. J Med Virol 2021; 93:1013-22..

In the United States, estimates suggest a USD 3,045 direct health care cost per COVID-19 case 88. Bartsch SM, Ferguson MC, McKinnell JA, O'Shea KJ, Wedlock PT, Siegmund SS, et al. The potential health care costs and resource use associated with COVID-19 in the United States. Health Aff (Millwood) 2020; 39:927-35.. However, indirect costs can represent a considerable proportion of the total economic cost of the disease and include the monetary value of productivity loss stemming from absence from paid work and other unpaid activities (e.g., caregiving) due to morbidity and mortality, with premature mortality being one of the main contributors to these costs 99. Hanly P, Ahern M, Sharp L, Ursul D, Loughnane G. The cost of lost productivity due to premature mortality associated with COVID-19: a Pan-European study. Eur J Health Econ 2022; 23:249-59..

This study aimed to describe persistent post-COVID-19 symptoms (especially neurological ones) and their repercussion on cognitive, emotional, and motor functions, quality of life, and indirect costs due to the loss of work productivity 12 months after acute infections.

Materials and method

Participants and study site

People with the first symptoms of COVID-19 from January to June 2021 who sought care at the Fortaleza Unit (Ceará, Brazil) of the SARAH Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals (SARAH Network) from April to June 2021 after the resolution of acute infections and who were diagnosed with post-COVID-19 syndrome were included in this study.

SARAH Network provides qualified and free medical care in neurology, orthopedics, and rehabilitation to all population strata. It has nine units in seven Brazilian states, including the Federal District.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, SARAH Network also aimed to rehabilitate patients with neurological complications due to COVID-19, such as post-COVID-19 syndrome, stroke, spinal cord inflammation, brachial plexus injuries, impaired muscle strength and/or sensation in upper or lower limbs, changes to balance and motor coordination, memory alterations, and other post-COVID-19 cognitive changes.

Inclusion criteria

(i) Adults diagnosed with post-COVID-19 syndrome, as defined by UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 11. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. COVID-19 rapid guideline: managing the long-term effects of COVID-19. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng188 (accessed on 08/Feb/2023).
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng188...
;

(ii) First symptoms of COVID-19 from January to June 2021, reported by patients at admission;

(iii) Functional limitation according to the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status (PCFS) scale (above grade 0) at admission to the rehabilitation center;

(iv) Authorized participation in the study by an informed consent form;

(v) A neurological diagnosis other than post-COVID-19 syndrome.

Exclusion criteria

(i) Physical or cognitive repercussions from other diagnoses prior to COVID-19;

(ii) Withdrawn authorization for participation;

(iii) Discontinued treatment or follow-up.

Study design

This is a prospective study of cases for 12 months or more after acute COVID-19 infection.

Patients were admitted within 30 days after registering for evaluation and rehabilitation of the neurological consequences of COVID-19. Registration at the rehabilitation center was spontaneous and accessible to anyone via the institutional website without the need for a medical referral.

Data on post-COVID-19 symptoms, length of initial hospital stay, and comorbidities were obtained at medical admission by a structured assessment based on external medical reports. The admission protocol had a list of the most frequent symptoms of post-COVID-19 syndrome and, at the end, an open field with “other symptoms”. Personal and sociodemographic data, such as age, sex, education, and employment status prior to COVID-19, were also collected at medical admission.

After patients were admitted, evaluated by the team, and administered examinations, patients were referred to a rehabilitation program consisting of weekly 3-hour consultations over six weeks if a diagnosis of post-COVID-19 syndrome was confirmed. The program contained a series of exercises for strength, physical conditioning, and balance gain, groups for emotional support, coping, and cognitive stimulation, and guidance on post-COVID-19 syndrome, health, and quality of life if necessary. It also had an interdisciplinary team consisting of a physician, a nurse, a physical therapist, a physical education teacher, and a psychologist. During this follow-up, patients also received individualized care with the interdisciplinary team if necessary. An illustrative material with guidance on exercises and activities was given to all patients to encourage them to follow it at home.

Then, follow-up was organized according to individual demands. Patients who still showed symptoms continued treatment by specific individual or group consultations in person or online. Patients who progressed with the complete resolution of symptoms (or still showed very mild symptoms) were encouraged to reenter the community, resume their personal and professional lives, and incorporate the guidelines for a healthy lifestyle and regular physical activity that were developed during the rehabilitation program.

Patients were contacted by phone 12 months after developing the first symptoms of COVID-19.

Information of interest referred to:

(i) Medical admission: persistent post-COVID-19 symptoms (evaluated by a structured assessment).

(ii) Admission to the interdisciplinary rehabilitation program: (a) global functional status - PCFS; (b) cognitive assessment - Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA); (c) emotional status - Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD); (d) motor functionality - 5 times sit-to-stand test (TLS5x), Timed up and go test (TUG), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and handgrip test; (e) perception of fatigue - Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS); (f) quality of life - Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36); and (g) indirect costs and loss of productivity by a specific questionnaire.

(iii) Phone contact 12 months or more after the first symptoms of COVID-19: (a) persistent post-COVID-19 symptoms by a structured assessment and (b) indirect costs and productivity loss by a specific questionnaire.

PCFS quickly classifies the global functional status of persons affected by COVID-19. It assesses participation in daily tasks and activities at home or at work/school and lifestyle changes. It has six gradations: PCFS0 (no symptoms), PCFS1 (negligible functional limitations), PCFS2 (slight functional limitations), PCFS3 (moderate functional limitations), PCFS4 (severe functional limitations), and PCFS5 (death) 1010. Klok FA, Boon GJAM, Barco S, Endres M, Miranda Geelhoed JJ, Knauss S, et al. The Post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale: a tool to measure functional status over time after COVID-19. Eur Respir J 2020; 56:2001494.,1111. Machado FVC, Meys R, Delbressine JM, Vaes AW, Goërtz YMJ, van Herck M, et al. Construct validity of the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale in adult subjects with COVID-19. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2021; 19:40..

MoCA is a brief screening instrument that evaluates some cognitive functions, such as executive, visuospatial skills, and naming functions; memory retrieval, digits, sentence, and abstract reasoning and orientation, with a maximum score of 30 points (considering scores above 26 as normal) 1212. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53:695-9.,1313. Sarmento ALR. Apresentação e aplicabilidade da versão brasileira da MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) para rastreio de comprometimento cognitivo leve [Masters Thesis]. São Paulo: Universidade Federal de São Paulo; 2009..

HAD consists of 14 questions, seven of which assess anxiety and seven, depression. Each item is scored on a scale from 0 to 3, with a total score of 21 points for each subscale (anxiety or depression). Scores below eight in each subscale indicate no anxiety or depression and those above nine, anxiety or depression 1414. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67:361-70.,1515. Botega NJ, Bio MR, Zomignani MA, Garcia Jr. C, Pereira WAB. Mood disorders among inpatients in ambulatory and validation of the anxiety and depression scale HAD. Rev Saúde Pública 1995; 29:359-63..

TLS5x measures the time to get up from a chair as quickly as possible five times 1616. Melo TA, Duarte ACM, Bezerra TS, França F, Soares NS, Brito D. The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test: safety and reliability with older intensive care unit patients at discharge. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2019; 31:27-33.. TUG 1717. Dutra MC, Cabral ALT, Carvalho G. Tradução para o português e validação do teste Timed Up and Go. Revista Interfaces: Saúde, Humanas e Tecnologia 2016; 3:81-8. consists of individuals getting up from a chair without the help of their arms and walking at the fastest and safest pace possible for three meters, turning around, returning, and sitting down again. In the 6MWT, the person walks along a flat corridor spanning a minimum length of 30 meters. The total distance traveled is measured at the end of the test 1818. Britto RR, Sousa LAP. Teste de caminhada de seis minutos: uma normatização brasileira. Fisioter Mov 2006; 19:49-54.. The handgrip test uses a dynamometer to measure grip strength in kilograms of force (Kgf) following Fernandes et al. 1919. Fernandes AA, Silva CD, Vieira BC, Marins JCB. Validade preditiva de equações de referência para força de preensão manual em homens brasileiros de meia idade e idosos. Fisioter Pesqui 2012; 19:351-6..

FSS is a 9-item instrument that assesses fatigue severity in daily activities. Each item is scored from 1 to 7, with a score of one indicating strong disagreement and seven, strong agreement, with a possible total score from nine to 63 points. Fatigue is worse the higher the final score 2020. Gomes LR. Validação da versão portuguesa da Escala de Impacto da Fadiga Modificada e da Escala de Severidade da Fadiga na esclerose múltipla [Masters Thesis]. Braga: Unviersidade do Minho; 2011..

SF-36 consists of a 36-item multidimensional questionnaire with eight domains: functional capacity, physical aspects, pain, general health status, vitality, social aspects, emotional aspects, and mental health. Each has a score from 0 to 100 in which the higher the score, the better the person’s perception of their quality of life in that domain 2121. Ciconelli RM, Ferraz MB, Santos W, Meinão I, Quaresma MR. Tradução para a língua portuguesa e validação do questionário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida SF-36 (Brasil SF-36). Rev Bras Reumatol 1999; 39:143-50..

To obtain the indirect costs, a questionnaire was developed to find work status before COVID-19, during follow-up, the moment the person returned to work, and reasons for failing to resume work. The human capital methodology was used at the Brazilian Health Technology Assessment Network 2222. Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia, Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos, Ministério da Saúde. Diretrizes metodológicas: diretriz de avaliação econômica. 2nd Ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2014. recommendation to evaluate the indirect costs associated with productivity loss by estimating the number of working hours or days lost due to the disease multiplied by the Brazilian per capita income. indirect costs was also shown by multiplying the workdays lost due to the disease with the average income reported by patients during interviews.

Data analysis

Data were descriptively and exploratorily analyzed by statistics (such as means and standard deviations) and percentages. The chi-squared and Mann-Whitney tests were used on SPSS, version 21 (https://www.ibm.com/), to evaluate associations between variables with a 5% significance level.

Ethical aspects

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the SARAH Network (CAAE 50357921.3.0000.0022).

Results

The Fortaleza Unit admitted 204 people with complaints related to COVID-19 complications from April to June 2021. Of these, this study included 122 and excluded 24 people. Figure 1 shows a detailed flowchart of the patient selection process.

The final sample consisted of 58 participants with a mean age of 52.8±10.5 years, of which 62% were women (Table 1).

Figure 1
Flowchart of patient selection in this study.

Table 1
Personal data, sociodemographic profile, employment prior to COVID-19, main comorbidities, and functional classification by the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status (PCFS) scale.

Most patients (67%) were admitted to the hospital for acute treatment of COVID-19 symptoms, with a 31-day mean length of stay (minimum 4; maximum 124 days). Of these, 60% required intensive care unit (ICU) admission for a 28-day mean length of stay (minimum 7; maximum 111 days) and 54%, intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation.

Table 1 shows personal data, sociodemographic profile, work status prior to COVID-19, main comorbidities, and functional classification according to the PCFS scale.

Main persistent symptoms of post-COVID-19 syndrome

Patients were admitted an average of 132±72 days after showing the first symptoms of COVID-19. Patients suffered from chronic fatigue most often (64%), followed by arthralgia (51%), dyspnea (47%), lowered mood (44%), anxiety (44%), sleep disorders (44%), difficulty walking (37%), and memory alterations (36%).

Telephone contact 12 months took place 451±31 days after the first symptoms of COVID-19. The most prevalent symptom referred to generalized fatigue (46%), memory impairment (39%), and dyspnea (31%). Figure 2 shows the most prevalent symptoms at admission and 12 post-COVID-19 months and Table 2, the main neurological symptoms grouped into cognitive and behavioral, motor, sensitive and painful, sensory (sight, hearing, smell, or taste), and sleep categories.

Table 2
Main neurological persistent symptoms reported by patients on admission and 12 months after the first symptoms of COVID-19 (phone follow-up).

Figure 2
Persistent symptoms reported by patients on admission and 12 months after the first symptoms of COVID-19 (phone follow-up).

Functional assessment and quality of life scales

The FSS assessment of fatigue obtained a 44.5±14 mean score, classifying 71.9% of patients as having moderate or severe fatigue. Regarding anxiety and depression, the HAD scale found probable or possible anxiety in 56% of patients and probable or possible depression in 46%. In cognitive screening, the MoCA scale showed a 22.0±0.7 mean score.

Regarding motor parameters, mean handgrip strength totaled 18.6±9.5Kgf on the right hand and 17.6±9.8Kgf on the left hand. The TLS5x test found a 11.2±3.8-second mean time and the 6MWT, a 352.4±154.2-meter mean distance.

Results for SF-36 quality of life dimensions showed a 59.8±20.1 general health status; 55.1±12.7 mental health, 51.3±22.5 functional capacity, 48.9±24.0 social aspect, 41.5±18.1 emotional aspect, 39.8±17.1 vitality, 26.9±39.1 pain, and 18.4±32.9 physical aspects mean scores.

Indirect costs and return to work

In total, 79% of participants were working before contracting COVID-19, 31% were self-employed without contributing to the Brazilian Social Security Institute (INSS, acronym in Portuguese), 22% had formal contracts, 19% were self-employed and contributed to the INSS, and 7% worked as public servants (Table 1).

This study found 11,653 days of absenteeism, amounting to 8.3 post-infection months for professional reintegration.

Based on the ratio of BRL 1 = USD 5.50, the average per capita income in Brazil (BRL 1,367.00 in 2021), and the human capital method, the 58 participants totaled an indirect costs equal to USD 120,822.35 in the first post-infection year.

Estimates considering those who were economically active before contracting COVID-19 and participants’ average income (BRL 3,225.82) found an indirect costs equal to USD 227,821.00 (or BRL 1,253,016.02) in the first post-infection year, i.e., USD 4,847.25 (BRL 26,659.92) per person.

After 12 months of COVID-19 infection, 32% of people were unable to return to work and 95% reported persistent post-COVID-19 symptoms as the main reason for it.

People who returned to work within 12 months after contracting a COVID-19 infection performed better on the TLS5x and had better quality of life according to the SF-36 functional capacity, physical functioning, vitality, and pain dimensions, showing a statistically significant difference in relation to patients who were unable to return to work (Table 3).

Table 3
Comparison of scale and functional test results between patients who returned and who failed to return to work.

Discussion

Our study found persistent symptoms similar to those in the literature 33. Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Gu X, et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. Lancet 2021; 397:220-32.,44. Malik P, Patel K, Pinto C, Jaiswal R, Tirupathi R, Pillai S, et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL): a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol 2022; 94:253-62.,55. Garrigues E, Janvier P, Kherabi Y, Le Bot A, Hamon A, Gouze H, et al. Post-discharge persistent symptoms and health-related quality of life after hospitalization for COVID-19. J Infect 2020; 81:e4-6.,66. Carfì A, Bernabei R, Landi F. Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19. JAMA 2020; 324:603-5.,77. Halpin SJ, McIvor C, Whyatt G, Adams A, Harvey O, McLean L, et al. Postdischarge symptoms and rehabilitation needs in survivors of COVID-19 infection: a cross-sectional evaluation. J Med Virol 2021; 93:1013-22. but a higher frequency of these symptoms, which we believe stems from participants’ more disabling profile of such symptoms since they sought rehabilitation precisely to improve these symptoms and their impacts on their functionality, quality of life, and productivity. The 4-month post-COVID-19 followed found generalized fatigue (64%), arthralgia (51%), dyspnea (47%), anxiety (44%), depression (44%), sleep disorders (44%), gait disorders (37%), and memory alteration (34%) as the most reported symptoms.

An important contribution of this study refers to its finding that symptoms can persist and significantly impact persons’ life up to 15 months after the infection as 46% of participants reported generalized fatigue; 39%, memory alterations; 31%, dyspnea; 25%, anxiety; and 25%, arthralgia.

Huang et al. 33. Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Gu X, et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. Lancet 2021; 397:220-32. reassessed 1,733 people who were discharged for COVID-19 six months after symptom onset, finding fatigue or muscle weakness (63%) and difficulty sleeping (26%) as the most common symptoms and that 23% of patients reported anxiety or depression.

A 2021 systematic review analyzed 33 studies with 8,293 people with persistent post-COVID-19 symptoms and found a 62% post-COVID-19 syndrome; 44%, fatigue, 40%, dyspnea; 34%, myalgia; and 33%, sleep disorder prevalence. Other symptoms included cough (22%), alopecia (20%), palpitations (20%), and arthralgia (13%) 2323. Jennings G, Monaghan A, Xue F, Mockler D, Romero-Ortuño R. A systematic review of persistent symptoms and residual abnormal functioning following acute COVID-19: ongoing symptomatic phase vs. post-COVID-19 syndrome. J Clin Med 2021; 10:5913..

Malik et al.’s 44. Malik P, Patel K, Pinto C, Jaiswal R, Tirupathi R, Pillai S, et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL): a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol 2022; 94:253-62. systematic review analyzed 12 studies with 4,828 patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome and found fatigue (64%), sleep disorders (47%), dyspnea (39.5%), arthralgia (24.3%), headache (21%), anosmia (20%), and mental health (14.5%) as the main persistent symptoms.

Considering the presence of symptoms at various times after COVID-19, Augustin et al. 2424. Augustin M, Schommers P, Stecher M, Dewald F, Gieselmann L, Gruell H, et al. Post-COVID syndrome in non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a longitudinal prospective cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2021; 6:100122. prospectively followed 442 and 353 patients over four and seven months after symptom onset, respectively, finding that 8.6% of patients had dyspnea; 12.4%, anosmia; 11.1%, ageusia; and 9.7%, fatigue four months after infection. After a 7-month median follow-up, symptoms remained similarly prevalent: 14.7% of anosmia, 13.6% of dyspnea, 14.7% of fatigue, and 11% of ageusia.

Of all the persistent symptoms in this study, only the prevalence of memory alterations increased over time; 36% of patients had it in the fourth month and 39%, in the 15th post-infection month. This study avoided explaining this increase but hypothesizes that it stems from the permanence of the deleterious effects of the virus in the brain areas related to memory or a perception change in patients as they were exposed to more complex tasks after resuming life activities. Braga et al. 2525. Braga LW, Oliveira SB, Moreira AS, Pereira ME, Carneiro VS, Serio AS, et al. Neuropsychological manifestations of long COVID in hospitalized and non-hospitalized Brazilian patients. NeuroRehabilitation 2022; 50:391-400. developed a pioneering study on people who sought rehabilitation services due to memory, attention, and cognitive problem solving difficulties up to eight months after infection, finding that patients’ performance was below the reference values in all subscales and general scores of the Barrow Neurological Institute Screen for Higher Cerebral Functions (BNIS), especially in subtests for affect, memory, phonemic verbal fluency, and clock drawing, configuring the first to find difficulties with affect expression and perception in people with post-COVID-19 syndrome.

Some post-COVID-19 symptoms commonly reported in the literature were infrequent in this study, such as coughing 2323. Jennings G, Monaghan A, Xue F, Mockler D, Romero-Ortuño R. A systematic review of persistent symptoms and residual abnormal functioning following acute COVID-19: ongoing symptomatic phase vs. post-COVID-19 syndrome. J Clin Med 2021; 10:5913., as no patient reported it in the first evaluation.

This study grouped patients’ main neurological symptoms, showing the repercussions of the post-COVID-19 syndrome on neurological systems and their impact by assessment scales, especially on cognitive-emotional, motor, and sensory-pain factors.

Based on scale results, 56% of patients had probable or possible anxiety and 46%, probable or possible depression, showing a 22 MoCA mean score. Regarding motor dimensions, 71.9% of patients had moderate or severe fatigue and altered handgrip, TSL5x, TUG, and 6MWT parameters.

Studies have also shown the functional changes due to post-COVID-19 syndrome by structured assessments: cognition and neuropsychology 2525. Braga LW, Oliveira SB, Moreira AS, Pereira ME, Carneiro VS, Serio AS, et al. Neuropsychological manifestations of long COVID in hospitalized and non-hospitalized Brazilian patients. NeuroRehabilitation 2022; 50:391-400.,2626. Crivelli L, Palmer K, Calandri I, Guekht A, Beghi E, Carroll W, et al. Changes in cognitive functioning after COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Alzheimers Dement 2022; 18:1047-66., anxiety and depression 2727. Saidi I, Koumeka PP, Ait Batahar S, Amro L. Factors associated with anxiety and depression among patients with Covid-19. Respir Med 2021; 186:106512.,2828. Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Rodríguez-Jiménez J, Palacios-Ceña M, de-la-Llave-Rincón AI, Fuensalida-Novo S, Florencio LL, et al. Psychometric properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in previously hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:9273., strength and physical conditioning 2929. Amaral VT, Viana AA, Heubel AD, Linares SN, Martinelli B, Witzler PHC, et al. Cardiovascular, respiratory, and functional effects of home-based exercise training after COVID-19 hospitalization. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2022; 54:1795-803.,3030. Dejvajara D, Aungkasuraphan R, Palee P, Piankusol C, Sirikul W, Siviroj P. Effects of home-based nine-square step exercises for fall prevention in Thai community-dwelling older adults during a COVID-19 lockdown: a pilot randomized controlled study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:10514., and fatigue 3131. Tirelli U, Franzini M, Valdenassi L, Pisconti S, Taibi R, Torrisi C, et al. Fatigue in post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV2 (PASC) treated with oxygen-ozone autohemotherapy - preliminary results on 100 patients. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2021; 25:5871-5.,3232. Nagy EN, Elimy DA, Ali AY, Ezzelregal HG, Elsayed MM. Influence of manual diaphragm release technique combined with inspiratory muscle training on selected persistent symptoms in men with post-Covid-19 syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med 2022; 54:jrm00330.. Our study also correlated functional scale results with work reintegration after COVID-19, finding that patients who resumed working had better TLS5x results.

The repercussions on quality of life were very significant, with physical aspects (18.4), pain (26.9), and vitality (39.8) configuring the main compromised dimensions. Since each dimension has a maximum score of 100 (with the highest score corresponding to a better perception of quality of life), these results evince the negative impact of COVID-19 on people’s health and lives.

Physical disability and reduced health-related quality of life are common repercussions after COVID-19 infection 77. Halpin SJ, McIvor C, Whyatt G, Adams A, Harvey O, McLean L, et al. Postdischarge symptoms and rehabilitation needs in survivors of COVID-19 infection: a cross-sectional evaluation. J Med Virol 2021; 93:1013-22.,3333. de Oliveira-Almeida K, Nogueira Alves IG, de Queiroz RS, de Castro MR, Gomes VA, Santos Fontoura FC, et al. A systematic review on physical function, activities of daily living and health-related quality of life in COVID-19 survivors. Chronic Illn 2023; 19:279-303.. Malik et al. 44. Malik P, Patel K, Pinto C, Jaiswal R, Tirupathi R, Pillai S, et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL): a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol 2022; 94:253-62. found that patients reported a low perceived quality of life, scoring 59% on the EQ-VAS scale. In the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire dimensions, 36% of participants perceived a low quality of life in mobility; 8%, in personal care; 28%, in usual quality; 42%, in pain/discomfort; and 38%, in anxiety/depression. Meta-regression analysis showed that worse quality of life was significantly higher among patients admitted to ICU and with symptoms of fatigue. Huang et al. 33. Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Gu X, et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. Lancet 2021; 397:220-32. found that patients generally classify quality of life with an 80% final score, with 27% of people reporting pain and discomfort; 23%, anxiety and depression; and 7%, mobility problems.

Cao et al. 3434. Cao J, Zheng X, Wei W, Chu X, Chen X, Wang Y, et al. Three-month outcomes of recovered COVID-19 patients: prospective observational study. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2021; 15:17534666211009410. followed 81 patients for three months after hospital discharge. Participants generally had a mild COVID-19 profile (only 13% required ICU and only one, intubation), unlike the profile in this study. The quality of life in the SF-36 was significantly impaired in the physical functioning and social functioning domains when compared to normal individuals of the same age. Differences between age groups showed impaired emotional state in the 41-64 age group; pain and mental health in the 41-64 age group; and emotional state in the 18-64 age group.

In this study, 32% of people who worked before contracting COVID-19 were unable to return to work even 15 months after the infection, and patients who reintegrated professionally required more than eight months to return. Cases without reintegration into the workplace showed a worse perception of quality of life regarding functional capacity, physical aspects, vitality, and pain. Regarding these results, we raise the possibility that the physical limitations of post-COVID-19 syndrome (such as fatigue, pain, muscle weakness, and poor physical conditioning) negatively impact participation and thus quality of life and job reinsertion.

Thus, indirect costs greatly exceeded the Brazilian socioeconomic reality, totaling hundreds of thousands of dollars for the 58 followed patients: USD 227,821.00 in the first year after infection, corresponding to USD 4,847.25 per person according to the reported income methodology. As this study only considered the indirect costs of work absenteeism, these costs would certainly be much higher if it had considered reduced work productivity, relatives leaving work to provide care, and premature deaths due to COVID-19.

Few studies report on the indirect costs of COVID-19 considering patients’ perspective. Ghaffari-Darab et al. 3535. Ghaffari-Darab M, Keshavarz K, Sadeghi E, Shahmohamadi J, Kavosi Z. The economic burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): evidence from Iran. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:132. analyzed the costs of 477 individuals admitted to a hospital in Iran and found a 21-day absenteeism average, estimating an average indirect cost of USD 11,634 per person by including loss of income from premature death, lower productivity due to hospitalization, and absenteeism during recovery.

A study with 19,086 U.S. military staff found that 299 (2%) required at least one hospitalization for COVID-19 (which averaged 4.8 days) 3636. Forrest L, Kotas K, Allman M, Marquez A, Kebisek J, Dye S, et al. Estimates of direct medical and indirect costs associated with COVID-19 among U.S. active duty Army soldiers. Mil Med 2022; (Online ahead of print).. Post-hospitalization recovery lasted an average of 11 days after hospital discharge, with a USD 4,782,790 total indirect costs and an average of USD 3,576 per person from recovery to return to work.

Maltezou et al. 3737. Maltezou HC, Giannouchos TV, Pavli A, Tsonou P, Dedoukou X, Tseroni M, et al. Costs associated with COVID-19 in healthcare personnel in Greece: a cost-of-illness analysis. J Hosp Infect 2021; 114:126-33. studied 3,332 healthcare providers and estimated EUR 1,735,830 total costs, with absenteeism representing a large part of this total (80.4% of all expenses, equivalent to EUR 1,388,664).

Study limitations

Participants sought rehabilitation as more severe post-COVID-19 syndrome persistent neurological symptoms impacted their lives. Thus, our results fail to reproduce the general status of post-COVID-19 syndrome due to the selection bias in the studied sample.

However, results probably denote cases with the more severe neurological symptoms of the disease.

This study also ignored the relation between the initial severity of COVID-19 and persistent symptoms. Although patients had more severe cases of COVID-19 at the beginning of the infection (64% were hospitalized for an average of one month; 60% were in the ICU for an average of 28 days, and 54% were intubated), developing this association is impossible as our research design is inappropriate for this.

Another limitation refers to the lack of evaluation parameters for sensitivity and pain, which were significant changes at follow-up. The SF-36 scale pain dimension partially compensated this limitation, which, according to patients’ perception, attested to pain and its impact on quality of life and return to work.

The study unfortunately failed to apply its functional scales 12 months after the infection in all patients, data that would be interesting to compare to initial evaluations.

Conclusion

The most frequent persistent symptoms in people with post-COVID-19 syndrome who sought rehabilitation at the Fortaleza unit of the SARAH network refer to generalized fatigue, arthralgia, dyspnea, anxiety, depression, and sleep disorders, impacting patients’ cognitive, emotional, motor, and quality of life function. These symptoms persisted for more than 12 post-infection months, with a greater frequency of generalized fatigue, memory impairment, dyspnea, anxiety, and arthralgia. Participants reported memory alterations more often 12 months after the infection than in their initial evaluation.

Patients with the more disabling symptoms of post-COVID-19 syndrome showed significant difficulties returning to work, demanding, on average, more than eight months for professional reintegration and totaling USD 4,847.25 indirect costs per person in one year.

Better results in the TLS5x and better perceived quality of life in functional capacity, physical aspects, vitality, and pain in the fourth post-infection month were related to return to work. Some cases showed no return to work even 15 months after the infection.

These results show the long-term repercussions of post-COVID-19 syndrome on cognitive, emotional, and motor functions, evincing its significant negative impact on affected people’s functionality, health, labor reintegration, and quality of life. Rehabilitation treatment by interdisciplinary health teams is essential due to the several compromised neurological dimensions as is long-term treatment for some cases as symptoms may last for more than 12 months post-infection.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Associação das Pioneiras Sociais (Brazil), responsible for managing the SARAH Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals, the institution that treated patients.

References

  • 1
    National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. COVID-19 rapid guideline: managing the long-term effects of COVID-19. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng188 (accessed on 08/Feb/2023).
    » https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng188
  • 2
    Tenforde MW, Kim SS, Lindsell CJ, Billig Rose E, Shapiro NI, Files DC, et al. Symptom duration and risk factors for delayed return to usual health among outpatients with COVID-19 in a multistate health care systems network - United States, March-June 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020; 69:993-8.
  • 3
    Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Gu X, et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. Lancet 2021; 397:220-32.
  • 4
    Malik P, Patel K, Pinto C, Jaiswal R, Tirupathi R, Pillai S, et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL): a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Virol 2022; 94:253-62.
  • 5
    Garrigues E, Janvier P, Kherabi Y, Le Bot A, Hamon A, Gouze H, et al. Post-discharge persistent symptoms and health-related quality of life after hospitalization for COVID-19. J Infect 2020; 81:e4-6.
  • 6
    Carfì A, Bernabei R, Landi F. Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19. JAMA 2020; 324:603-5.
  • 7
    Halpin SJ, McIvor C, Whyatt G, Adams A, Harvey O, McLean L, et al. Postdischarge symptoms and rehabilitation needs in survivors of COVID-19 infection: a cross-sectional evaluation. J Med Virol 2021; 93:1013-22.
  • 8
    Bartsch SM, Ferguson MC, McKinnell JA, O'Shea KJ, Wedlock PT, Siegmund SS, et al. The potential health care costs and resource use associated with COVID-19 in the United States. Health Aff (Millwood) 2020; 39:927-35.
  • 9
    Hanly P, Ahern M, Sharp L, Ursul D, Loughnane G. The cost of lost productivity due to premature mortality associated with COVID-19: a Pan-European study. Eur J Health Econ 2022; 23:249-59.
  • 10
    Klok FA, Boon GJAM, Barco S, Endres M, Miranda Geelhoed JJ, Knauss S, et al. The Post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale: a tool to measure functional status over time after COVID-19. Eur Respir J 2020; 56:2001494.
  • 11
    Machado FVC, Meys R, Delbressine JM, Vaes AW, Goërtz YMJ, van Herck M, et al. Construct validity of the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale in adult subjects with COVID-19. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2021; 19:40.
  • 12
    Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53:695-9.
  • 13
    Sarmento ALR. Apresentação e aplicabilidade da versão brasileira da MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) para rastreio de comprometimento cognitivo leve [Masters Thesis]. São Paulo: Universidade Federal de São Paulo; 2009.
  • 14
    Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67:361-70.
  • 15
    Botega NJ, Bio MR, Zomignani MA, Garcia Jr. C, Pereira WAB. Mood disorders among inpatients in ambulatory and validation of the anxiety and depression scale HAD. Rev Saúde Pública 1995; 29:359-63.
  • 16
    Melo TA, Duarte ACM, Bezerra TS, França F, Soares NS, Brito D. The Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test: safety and reliability with older intensive care unit patients at discharge. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2019; 31:27-33.
  • 17
    Dutra MC, Cabral ALT, Carvalho G. Tradução para o português e validação do teste Timed Up and Go. Revista Interfaces: Saúde, Humanas e Tecnologia 2016; 3:81-8.
  • 18
    Britto RR, Sousa LAP. Teste de caminhada de seis minutos: uma normatização brasileira. Fisioter Mov 2006; 19:49-54.
  • 19
    Fernandes AA, Silva CD, Vieira BC, Marins JCB. Validade preditiva de equações de referência para força de preensão manual em homens brasileiros de meia idade e idosos. Fisioter Pesqui 2012; 19:351-6.
  • 20
    Gomes LR. Validação da versão portuguesa da Escala de Impacto da Fadiga Modificada e da Escala de Severidade da Fadiga na esclerose múltipla [Masters Thesis]. Braga: Unviersidade do Minho; 2011.
  • 21
    Ciconelli RM, Ferraz MB, Santos W, Meinão I, Quaresma MR. Tradução para a língua portuguesa e validação do questionário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida SF-36 (Brasil SF-36). Rev Bras Reumatol 1999; 39:143-50.
  • 22
    Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia, Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos, Ministério da Saúde. Diretrizes metodológicas: diretriz de avaliação econômica. 2nd Ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2014.
  • 23
    Jennings G, Monaghan A, Xue F, Mockler D, Romero-Ortuño R. A systematic review of persistent symptoms and residual abnormal functioning following acute COVID-19: ongoing symptomatic phase vs. post-COVID-19 syndrome. J Clin Med 2021; 10:5913.
  • 24
    Augustin M, Schommers P, Stecher M, Dewald F, Gieselmann L, Gruell H, et al. Post-COVID syndrome in non-hospitalised patients with COVID-19: a longitudinal prospective cohort study. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2021; 6:100122.
  • 25
    Braga LW, Oliveira SB, Moreira AS, Pereira ME, Carneiro VS, Serio AS, et al. Neuropsychological manifestations of long COVID in hospitalized and non-hospitalized Brazilian patients. NeuroRehabilitation 2022; 50:391-400.
  • 26
    Crivelli L, Palmer K, Calandri I, Guekht A, Beghi E, Carroll W, et al. Changes in cognitive functioning after COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Alzheimers Dement 2022; 18:1047-66.
  • 27
    Saidi I, Koumeka PP, Ait Batahar S, Amro L. Factors associated with anxiety and depression among patients with Covid-19. Respir Med 2021; 186:106512.
  • 28
    Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Rodríguez-Jiménez J, Palacios-Ceña M, de-la-Llave-Rincón AI, Fuensalida-Novo S, Florencio LL, et al. Psychometric properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in previously hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:9273.
  • 29
    Amaral VT, Viana AA, Heubel AD, Linares SN, Martinelli B, Witzler PHC, et al. Cardiovascular, respiratory, and functional effects of home-based exercise training after COVID-19 hospitalization. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2022; 54:1795-803.
  • 30
    Dejvajara D, Aungkasuraphan R, Palee P, Piankusol C, Sirikul W, Siviroj P. Effects of home-based nine-square step exercises for fall prevention in Thai community-dwelling older adults during a COVID-19 lockdown: a pilot randomized controlled study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:10514.
  • 31
    Tirelli U, Franzini M, Valdenassi L, Pisconti S, Taibi R, Torrisi C, et al. Fatigue in post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV2 (PASC) treated with oxygen-ozone autohemotherapy - preliminary results on 100 patients. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2021; 25:5871-5.
  • 32
    Nagy EN, Elimy DA, Ali AY, Ezzelregal HG, Elsayed MM. Influence of manual diaphragm release technique combined with inspiratory muscle training on selected persistent symptoms in men with post-Covid-19 syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med 2022; 54:jrm00330.
  • 33
    de Oliveira-Almeida K, Nogueira Alves IG, de Queiroz RS, de Castro MR, Gomes VA, Santos Fontoura FC, et al. A systematic review on physical function, activities of daily living and health-related quality of life in COVID-19 survivors. Chronic Illn 2023; 19:279-303.
  • 34
    Cao J, Zheng X, Wei W, Chu X, Chen X, Wang Y, et al. Three-month outcomes of recovered COVID-19 patients: prospective observational study. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2021; 15:17534666211009410.
  • 35
    Ghaffari-Darab M, Keshavarz K, Sadeghi E, Shahmohamadi J, Kavosi Z. The economic burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): evidence from Iran. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:132.
  • 36
    Forrest L, Kotas K, Allman M, Marquez A, Kebisek J, Dye S, et al. Estimates of direct medical and indirect costs associated with COVID-19 among U.S. active duty Army soldiers. Mil Med 2022; (Online ahead of print).
  • 37
    Maltezou HC, Giannouchos TV, Pavli A, Tsonou P, Dedoukou X, Tseroni M, et al. Costs associated with COVID-19 in healthcare personnel in Greece: a cost-of-illness analysis. J Hosp Infect 2021; 114:126-33.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    19 Feb 2024
  • Date of issue
    2024

History

  • Received
    13 Feb 2023
  • Reviewed
    13 Sept 2023
  • Accepted
    05 Oct 2023
Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sergio Arouca, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: cadernos@ensp.fiocruz.br