Print version ISSN 1413-8123
Ciênc. saúde coletiva vol.16 n.10 Rio de Janeiro Oct. 2011
Self-perception and malocclusion and their relation to oral appearance and function
Auto-percepção e má oclusão relacionadas à aparência e a função bucal
Sílvia Helena de Carvalho Sales PeresI; Suzana GoyaI; Karine Laura CortellazziII; Gláucia Maria Bovi AmbrosanoII; Marcelo de Castro MeneghimII; Antonio Carlos PereiraII
IDepartamento de Odontopediatria Ortodontia e Saúde Coletiva, Universidade de São Paulo. Alameda Octávio Pinheiro Brisola 9-75, Vila Universitária. 17012-101 Bauru SP. email@example.com
IIFaculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba, Universidade de Campinas
The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between malocclusion and self-perception of oral appearance/function, in 12/15-year-old Brazilian adolescents. The cluster sample consisted of 717 teenagers attending 24 urban public (n=611) and 5 rural public (n=107) schools in Maringá/PR. Malocclusion was measured using the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI), in accordance with WHO recommendations. A parental questionnaire was applied to collect information on esthetic perception level and oral variables related to oral health. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed. Multiple logistic regression confirmed that for 12-year-old, missing teeth (OR=2.865) and presence of openbite (open occlusal relationship) (OR=2.865) were risk indicators for speech capability. With regard to 15-year-old, presence of mandibular overjet (horizontal overlap) (OR=4.016) was a risk indicator for speech capability and molar relationship (OR=1.661) was a risk indicator for chewing capability. The impact of malocclusion on adolescents' life was confirmed in this study. Speech and chewing capability were associated with orthodontic deviations, which should be taken into consideration in oral health planning, to identify risk groups and improve community health services.
Key words: Malocclusion, Adolescent health, Self concept, Oral health
Este estudo objetivou avaliar a relação entre a má oclusão e a autopercepção da aparência/função bucal em adolescentes brasileiros de 12/15 anos de idade. A amostragem foi probabilística, constituída por 717 adolescentes de escolas públicas, sendo 24 urbanas (n=611) e 5 rurais (n=107), em Maringá/PR. A má oclusão foi medida por meio do Índice de Estética Dental (DAI), de acordo com os critérios da OMS. Foi aplicado um questionário aos pais para coletar informações sobre o nível de percepção estética e as variáveis relacionadas à saúde bucal. Análises univariada e de regressão logística múltipla foram realizadas. A regressão logística múltipla confirmou que para 12 anos, os dentes ausentes (OR=2,865) e a presença de mordida aberta (OR=2,865) foram indicadores de risco na capacidade de fala. Com relação aos 15 anos, a presença de overjet mandibular (OR=4,016) foi um indicador de risco para a capacidade de expressão e a relação molar (OR=1,661) foi um indicador de risco para a capacidade mastigatória. O impacto da má oclusão na vida dos adolescentes foi confirmado neste estudo. A capacidade da fala e da mastigação esteve associada às alterações ortodônticas, as quais devem ser levadas em consideração no planejamento de saúde bucal, para identificar grupos de risco e para melhorar os serviços de saúde.
Palavras-chave: Má oclusão, Saúde do adolescente, Autoimagem, Saúde bucal
It has been reported that clinical (normative) and subjective (self-assessment) evaluation of malocclusion demonstrate a significant disparity. The dental public health team is obliged to recognize and understand this gap.
Esthetic perception varies from person to person and is influenced by their personal experience and social environment. For this reason, professional opinions regarding evaluation of facial esthetics may not coincide with the perceptions and expectations of patients or lay people1,2.
The anterior visible occlusion and examiner's level of education may be important for understanding the patient's perception when discussing the esthetic considerations of orthodontic treatment3.
An important motivational factor is to improve dentofacial appearance4,5. The relationship between physical appearance and perception of an esthetic deviation, and the impact of such a deviation on self-esteem and body image is an important issue in determining the benefits of orthodontic treatment.
A variety of social, cultural and psychological factors, and personal norms influence the perception of physical attractiveness6,7. Studies in social psychology indicate that physical attractiveness plays a major role in social interaction and influences the impression of an individual's social skill7,8.
The Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) adopted by the World Health Organization has been used to assess malocclusion and determine treatment needs9-11, and has been integrated into all items of the International Collaboration Study of Oral Health outcomes and guidelines by the WHO12,13. Self or patient opinions regarding orthodontic treatment needs have previously been recorded for dental and facial appearance6,14,15, and such concerns do not always concur with professional evaluations of treatment requirements16,17.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the dental aesthetic index (DAI) and self-perception of oral appearance and function in 12/15-year-old Brazilian adolescents.
Materials and method
The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo. Written permission was obtained from adolescents' parents before starting the clinical examinations.
In total, a cluster sample composed of 717 students, aged 12 and 15 years, attending 30 representative public schools in Maringá, Brazil, were examined. The sample was organized by gender (340 girls, 377 boys) and age (402 - 12-year-olds, 315 - 15-year-olds). The clusters were rural (n=212) and urban (n=1192) schools. Schools and grades were randomly selected.
The cluster sampling method was used admitting a sampling error of 5%, mean dmft of 2.5 with standard deviation of 1.8, a confidence level of 95% and loss of 20%.
Students who had orthodontic treatment or were currently wearing an orthodontic appliance were not included in the study.
Clinical examination was performed by one previously calibrated examiner, outdoors, under natural light, using CPI probes ("ball point"), mirrors #5 13 and air-drying. Before examination each children performed tooth brushing supervised by a dental hygienist.
A benchmark dental examiner ("Gold Standard"), experienced in epidemiological surveys, conducted the calibration process that lasted 24 hours (4 sessions). Theoretical and practical activities with discussions on the diagnostic criteria of malocclusion were performed by two examiners (gold standard and main examiner). Approximately 10% of the sample was re-examined in order to verify the intra-examiner reproducibility. Inter-examiner agreement was 0.85 expressed by the Kappa statistics. This value indicated reliability within acceptable limits18.
Diagnostic criteria and codes
Professional treatment needs were obtained by assessing the teenagers using the DAI in accordance with the WHO guideline13. All 10 components of the index were assessed (Table 1). One of the authors was previously calibrated using re-examination of dental students.
All teenagers received a semi-structured questionnaire to be answered according to their self-perceptions and perceived esthetic of malocclusion. The goal of this questionnaire was to collect information about speech capability, chewing capability and report of pain.
Univariate analyses using the Chi-square test (χ2) at 5% significance level were performed to test the influence of independent variables (openbite, missing teeth, crowding, spacing, midline diastema, maxillary irregularity, mandibular irregularity, maxillary overjet, mandibular overjet, molar relation and gender on dependent variables (speech capability, chewing capability and report of pain). The dependent variables (speech and chewing capability) were dichotomized into bad/regular and good/excellent while the dependent variable "report of pain" was dichotomized into children with or without pain. The independent variables related to DAI components (Table 1) were dichotomized according to absence (code 0) and presence (code 1). Next, multiple logistic regression analyses using the stepwise procedure were performed in order to identify the self-perception indicators. In order to eliminate variables that would make little contribution to the model, only the independent variables that showed significant association at p<0.15 in the univariate analysis were tested in regression model19,20. The logistic regression models were adjusted estimating the Odds Ratios (OR), their 95% confidence intervals (IC), and significance levels. All statistical analyses were performed using the SAS software21 at 5% significance level.
The Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) was calculated using the scores expressed in Table 1.
Tables 2, 3 and 4 present univariate analyses, using Chi-square or the Fisher's Exact Test, associating dependent variables (speech capability, chewing capability and report of pain) with independent variables cited in DAI classification (Table 1).
Table 2 shows the statistically significant association (all variables at p<0.15 were tested in regression analysis) between "speech capability" and openbite, missing teeth and spacing for 12-year-olds, while for 15-year-old sample "speech capability" was associated with maxillary irregularity, mandibular overjet and molar relationship.
In Table 3 a statistically significant association between "chewing capability" and mandibular irregularity can be found for 12 year olds, as well as openbite, maxillary overjet and molar relationship for 15-year-olds.
"Report of pain" was statistically associated with missing teeth and mandibular irregularity for 12-year-olds, as well as mandibular overjet and gender for 15 year olds (Table 4).
The data from the regression analyses confirmed most of these associations. For the 12-year-old sample, missing teeth (OR=2.865) and presence of openbite (OR=2.865) were risk indicators for "speech capability". As regards the 15-year-old sample, presence of mandibular overjet (OR=4.016) was a risk indicator for "speech capability" and molar relationship (OR=1.661) was a risk indicator for "chewing capability" (Tables 5 and 6).
Botazzo22 presents how the problems arising from the concept of collective buccal health are seen as having the same nature and can only be faced using analytical categories from collective health or the social theory of health. Concern over appearance and dental attractiveness appears to be affected by gender, social class and age23,24. The place of esthetic and functional criteria in determining orthodontic treatment need cannot be underestimated, as these are major indications for patients seeking orthodontic services.
Due to the increasing global demand for orthodontic care, there is a need to develop methods to assess and grade malocclusion in order to prioritize treatment, particularly for publicly funded programs25.
Deviant occlusal traits are relatively easy to use, are identified by DAI, and link clinical and esthetic components mathematically to produce a single score11. The structure of the DAI consists of 10 prominent traits of malocclusion, weighted on the basis of their relative importance according to a panel of lay judges.
The DAI combines physical and esthetic aspects of occlusion, including patient perceptions. The DAI equation loses some precision when regression coefficients are rounded, but this small sacrifice in precision is offset by convenience in many clinical and research applications26. Moreover, its acceptance by the WHO as index will encourage international comparisons.
Epidemiological data concerning occlusal conditions have been accumulated by the WHO from all over the world using the DAI. The DAI is becoming a common standard for evaluating malocclusion, and WHO has recognized it as a cross-cultural international index. Katoh et al.27 confirmed that Japanese and Native Americans showed significantly poorer dental esthetics than found in American white populations9,28. The present study did not consider the sample in relation to nationalities or ethnic origins. However, average 20.0% of adolescents had no abnormality or minor malocclusion requiring no or slight orthodontic treatment need. The results of the present study were no correlation with the studies by Brazilian Oral Health Survey-2002-200329 (58.1%) and Frazão et al30 in São Paulo (71.3%) and Marques et al31 in Belo Horizonte (62.0%). The differences may have occurred through the methods of sample selection and the criteria used for diagnosis. A point to be considering is miscegenation existing in southern region, which may in some way have contributed to the occurrence of a lower prevalence of malocclusion in Maringá-PR.
The reasons for improved self-image are probably the result of age-related conditions32, rather than the effects of orthodontic treatment. The pattern of no change in self-esteem corroborates the finding in another study33. Orthodontic treatment may enhance body image, and particularly facial image34. The results of this study showed that gender did not significantly influence an adolescent's orthodontic esthetic self-perception in 12- and 15-year-old people (Tables 2, 3 and 4), however, malocclusion measured by DAI, can strongly influence the perception of esthetic appearance.
In this study, a statistically significant relationship between self-perceived malocclusion and oral appearance/function in adolescents was verified. Missing teeth, openbite presence, mandibular overjet and molar relationship were risk indicators to speech and chewing capability. These findings indicate that the DAI can identify deviant occlusal traits, which suggests that community programs involving orthodontic treatment should take it into consideration during trials.
The association between a subject's perceptions of malocclusion and the DAI score was weak but significant in some variables. Molar relationship discrepancy was the only variable associated with poorer conditions of chewing capability, which supports the findings of Onyeaso and Aderinokun11. The statistical association between malocclusion and speech capability verified in this study does not support the findings of Shue-Te Yeh et al35.
The analyses revealed (Table 4) an association between self-perception relating to "report of pain" and malocclusion, expressed by mandibular irregularity, which seems to confirm the interaction between functional aspects of occlusion and pain (p<0.01). Thus, DAI scores could be significantly associated with perception of need for treatment36.
The answers to the questionnaire indicated that the adolescents in the sample reported pleasant esthetics as an important factor for psychosocial well being. In general, this study showed that orthodontic treatment is accepted as an important part of the health service, especially due to the psychological impact of malocclusion on self-esteem. These findings highlight the importance of introducing a perceptual measure of the esthetic impact of malocclusion, in addition to measuring normative orthodontic treatment need.
Since the DAI has been accepted by the WHO, more clinic-based studies (demand populations) should be encouraged across the globe. This could be helpful in assessing the severity of malocclusions being treated in several parts of the world, as this is different from epidemiological reports, at least for the purposes of comparison25.
The malocclusion perception measured by the DAI was associated with three dependent variables (speech capability, chewing capability and report of pain), which could suggest that in future studies, there may be value in pursuing further refinement of ways to measure these traits, as these may be important dimensions of oral health perceptions, and potential targets for interventions with the aim of improving use of and access to care.
The impact of malocclusion on adolescents' lives was confirmed in this study. Speech and chewing capability were associated with orthodontic deviations, which should be taken into consideration in oral health planning, to identify risk groups and improve community health services.
SHC Sales-Peres participated in the theoretical design, construction methodology, writing and research, as well as the review the final text; S Goya participated in the research; KL Cortellazzi and GMB Ambrosiano participated in the statistical analysis; MC Meneghim and AC Pereira participated in the review the final text.
The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge to all pupils and staff of schools that took part in the study.
1. Albino JEN, Laurence SD, Tedesco LA. Psychological and social effects of treatment. J Behav Med 1994; 17(1):81-98. [ Links ]
2. Pogrel MA. What are normal esthetic values? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 49(9):963-969. [ Links ]
3. Flores-Mir C, Silva E, Barriga MI, Lagrave MO, Major PW. Lay person's perception of smile aesthetics in dental and facial views. J Orthodont 2004; 31(3):204-209. [ Links ]
4. Gosney MBE. An investigation into some of the factors influencing the desire for orthodontic treatment. Brit J Orthodont 1986; 13(2):87-94. [ Links ]
5. Birkeland K, Katle A, Lovgreen S, Boe OE, Wisth PJ. A longitudinal study among 11- and 15-yearolds and their parents on factors influencing the decision about orthodontic treatment. J Orofacial Orthop 1999; 60(5):292-307. [ Links ]
6. Jenny J. A social perspective of dentofacial esthetics and orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod 1975; 54(1):18-35. [ Links ]
7. Baldwin DC. Appearance and aesthetic in oral health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1980; 8(5):244-256. [ Links ]
8. Shaw WC. The influence of children's dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod 1980; 79(4):399-415. [ Links ]
9. Ansai T, Miyazaki H, Katoh Y, Yamashita Y, Take-hara T, Jenny J, Cons NC. Prevalence of malocclusion in high school students in Japan according to the dental Aesthetic Index. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993; 21(5):303-305. [ Links ]
10. Estioko LJ, Wright FAC, Morgan MV. Orthodontic treatment need of secondary school children in Heidelberg, Victoria: an epidemiological study using the DAI. Community Dent Health 1994; 11(3): 147-151. [ Links ]
11. Onyeaso CO, Aderinokun GA. The relationship between dental aesthetic index (DAI) andperceptions of aesthetics, function and speech amongst secondary school children in Ibadan, Nigeria. Int J Paediatr Dent 2003; 13(5):336-341. [ Links ]
12. World Health Organization (WHO). International Collaboration Study of Oral Health Outcomes (ICSII), Document 2 - Oral Data Collection and Examination Criteria. Geneva: WHO; 1989. [ Links ]
13. World Health Organization (WHO). Oral Health Surveys: Basic methods. 4thed. Geneva: WHO; 1997. [ Links ]
14. Espeland LU, Ivarsson K, Stenvik A, Alstad TA. Perception of malocclusion in 11-year-old children: a comparison between personal and parental awareness. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14(5):350-358. [ Links ]
15. Onyeaso CO, Sanu OO. Psychosocial implications of malocclusion among 12-18 year old secondary school children in Ibadan. Odontostomatol Trop 2005; 28(109):39-48. [ Links ]
16. Lewit DW, Virolainen K. Conformity and independence in adolescents' motivation for orthodontic treatment. Child Dev 1968; 39(4):1189-1200. [ Links ]
17. Onyeaso CO. Orthodontic Treatment Complexity and Need in a Group of Nigerian Patients: The Relationship between the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) and the Index of Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON). J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8(3):37-44. [ Links ]
18. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33(1):159-174. [ Links ]
19. Lucas SD, Portela MC, Mendonça LL. Variations in tooth decay rates among children 5 and 12 years old in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica 2005; 21(1):55-63. [ Links ]
20. Tagliaferro EPS, Pereira AC, Meneghim MC, Ambrosano GMB. Assessment of dental caries predictors in a seven-year longitudinal study. J Publ Health Dent 2006; 66(3):169-173. [ Links ]
21. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 8.2. Cary (NY): SAS Institute Inc.; 2001. [ Links ]
22 .Botazzo C. Sobre a bucalidade: notas para a pesquisa e contribuição ao debate. Cien Saude Colet 2006; 11(1):7-17. [ Links ]
23. Horowitz HS, Vohen LK, Doyle J. Occlusal relations in children born and reared in an optimally fluoridated community. (IV) Clinical and socio-psychological findings. Angle Orthod 1971; 41(3):189-201. [ Links ]
24. Jenkins PM, Feldman BS, Stirrups DR. The effect of social class and dental features on referrals for orthodontic advice and treatment. Br J Orthod 1984; 11(4):185-188. [ Links ]
25. Onyeaso CO, BeGole EA. Orthodontic Treatment Need in an Accredited Graduate Orthodontic Center in North America: A Pilot Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7(2):1-5. [ Links ]
26. Cons NC, Jenny J, Kohout FJ. DAI: the Dental Aesthetic Index. Iowa City: College of Dentistry University of Iowa; 1986. [ Links ]
27. Katoh Y, Ansai T, Kitakyushu TT, Fukuoka YY, Niigata HM, Jenny J, Cons NC. A comparison of DAI scores and characteristics of occlusal traits in three ethnic groups of Asian origin. Int Dent J 1998; 48(4): 405-411. [ Links ]
28. Jenny J, Cons NC, Kohout FJ, Jakobson J. Differences in need for orthodontic treatment between native Americans and the general population based on DAI scores. J Public Health Dent 1991; 51(4):234-238. [ Links ]
29. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde (MS). Secretaria de políticas de Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Básica. Área Técnica de Saúde Bucal. Projeto SB Brasil: condições de saúde bucal da população brasileira. Resultados principais. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2004. [ Links ]
30. Frazão P, Narvai PC, Latorre MRDO, Castellanos RA. Prevalência de oclusopatia na dentição decídua e permanente de crianças na cidade de São Paulo, Brasil, 1996. Cad Saude Publica 2002; 18(5):1197-1205. [ Links ]
31. Marques LS, Barbosa CC, Ramos-Jorge ML, Pordeus IA, Paiva SM. Prevalência da maloclusão e necessidade de tratamento ortodôntico em escolares de 10 a 14 anos de idade em Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil: enfoque psicossocial. Cad Saude Publica 2005; 21(4):1099-1106. [ Links ]
32. Alsaker F, Olweus D. Global self-evaluations and perceived instability of self in early adolescence: a cohort longitudinal study. Scand J Psychol 1993; 34(1):47-63. [ Links ]
33. Korabik K. Self-concept changes during orthodontic treatment. J Appl Soc Psychol 1994; 24(11):1022-1034. [ Links ]
34. Varela M, Garcia-Camba JE. Impact of orthodontics on psychologic profile of adults patients: a prospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108(2):142-148. [ Links ]
35. Shue-Te Yeh M, Koochek AR, Vlaskalic V, Boyd R, Richmond S. The relationship of 2 professional occlusal indexes with patients' perceptions of aesthetics, function, speech, and orthodontic treatment need. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118(4):421-428. [ Links ]
36. Jenny J, Cons NC. Establishing malocclusion severity levels on The Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) scale. Aust Dent J 1996; 41(1):43-46. [ Links ]
Artigo apresentado em 08/03/2010
Aprovado em 19/06/2010
Versão final apresentada em 30/06/2010