Risk factors for perinatal death in high-risk pregnant women at a tertiary hospital in Curitiba-PR, Brazil: a case-control study

Carla Caroline Szyhta Zilda Pereira da Silva Gizelton Pereira Alencar Marcia Furquim de Almeida About the authors

Abstract

A case-control study was carried out to estimate risk factors for perinatal mortality in a referral hospital for high-risk pregnancies in Curitiba-PR. Sociodemographic, maternal, pregnancy and concept characteristics data were obtained from the hospital records of 316 cases and 316 controls from 2013 to 2017. A hierarchical multiple logistic regression analysis was performed, remaining in the final model variables with p < 0.05. The results show an increased risk of perinatal death in mothers with blood type B (OR = 2.82; 95%CI: 1.07-7.43), who did not undergo prenatal care (OR = 30.78; 95%CI: 4.23-224.29), fetuses with congenital malformations (OR = 63.90; 95%CI: 27.32-149.48), born under 28 (OR = 24.21; 95%CI: 1, 10-531.81) and between 28-31 weeks of gestation (OR = 6.03; 95%CI: 1.34-27.17) and birth weight below 1,000g (OR = 51.94; 95%CI: 4.31-626.46), between 1,000-1,499g (OR = 11.17; 95%CI: 2.29-54.41) and between 1,500-2,499g (OR = 2.75; 25-6.06). Concepts of pregnancies with premature outcome, low birth weight and the presence of congenital malformations are the main risk factors for perinatal death. On the other hand, adequate prenatal care is an important protective factor.

Key words:
Perinatal death; High-risk pregnancy; Risk factors; Case-control studies

Introduction

Perinatal mortality is a key indicator of maternal and child health and reflects socioeconomic conditions and the quality of antenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal care11 Rêgo MGS, Vilela MBR, Oliveira CM, Bonfim CV. Óbitos perinatais evitáveis por intervenções do Sistema Único de Saúde do Brasil. Rev Gaucha Enferm 2018;39:e2017-0084.. Perinatal death is defined as a death occurring between the 22nd week of gestation and sixth completed day after birth and encompasses fetal deaths and early neonatal deaths22 Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças e Problemas Relacionados à Saúde, CID-10. São Paulo: EDUSP; 1998.. The majority of perinatal deaths can be prevented by improving access to health services and the quality of preconception, antenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal care33 Bezerra IMP, Ramos JLS, Pianissola MC, Adami F, Rocha JBFD, Ribeiro MAL, Castro MR, Bezerra JDF, Smiderle FRN, Sousa LVA, Siqueira CE, Abreu LC. Perinatal mortality analysis in Espírito Santo, Brazil, 2008 to 2017. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18(21):11671.. The analysis of fetal and early neonatal mortality together is important because the causes of death are similar and can be reduced using the same interventions44 Nobrega AA, Mendes YMMBE, Miranda MJ, Santos ACC, Lobo AP, Porto DL, França GVA . Mortalidade perinatal no Brasil em 2018: análise epidemiológica segundo a classificação de Wiggleworth modificada. Cad Saude Publica 2022; 38(1):e00003121.,55 Lansky S, França E, Leal MC. Mortalidade perinatal e evitabilidade: revisão da literatura. Rev Saude Publica 2002; 36(6):759-772..

In areas where pregnant women have access to quality health care, the leading causes of perinatal death are congenital birth defects, preterm birth, and intrauterine growth restriction, while in underserved regions, the main causes are asphyxia and infections66 Manjavidze T, Rylander C, Skjeldestad FE, Kazakhashvili N, Anda EE. Incidence and causes of perinatal mortality in Georgia. J Epidemiol Glob Health 2019; 9(3):163-168.. In 2020, approximately 2.4 million children died in the first month of life worldwide, which is equivalent to around 6,700 deaths every day77 United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF). Levels & trends in child mortality: report 2021. New York: UNICEF; 2021.. In addition, around 5,400 babies are stillborn every day. In 2019, there were approximately 2 million fetal deaths, with almost half occurring in the intrapartum period88 United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF). A neglected tragedy: the global burden of stillbirths [Internet]. 2020. [cited 2022 mar 2]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/UN-IGME-2020-Stillbirth-Report-updated.pdf
https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploa...
.

During the first two decades of this century, the reduction in the stillbirth rate was lower than in other age groups. The annual rate of reduction in the fetal mortality rate was just 2.3%, compared to a 2.9% reduction in neonatal mortality and 4.3% among children aged 1-59 months. In 2019, the global stillbirth rate was 13.9 per 1,000 births, representing a reduction of 35% in relation to 2000. However, there are striking differences in stillbirth rates between countries, with numbers ranging from 1.4 to 32.2 per 1,000 births and 84% of deaths occurring in low- and lower-middle income nations88 United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF). A neglected tragedy: the global burden of stillbirths [Internet]. 2020. [cited 2022 mar 2]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/UN-IGME-2020-Stillbirth-Report-updated.pdf
https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploa...
.

Statistics in Brazil show that the fetal mortality rate has fallen by 25%, from 10 per 1,000 births in 1996 to 7.5 in 201988 United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF). A neglected tragedy: the global burden of stillbirths [Internet]. 2020. [cited 2022 mar 2]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/UN-IGME-2020-Stillbirth-Report-updated.pdf
https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploa...
, meaning that the country has already met the Every Newborn Action Plan target of ≤ 12 fetal deaths per 1,000 births by 203099 Healthy Newborn Network. Every Newborn [Internet]. 2018. [cited 2018 abr 24]. Available from: https://www.healthynewbornnetwork.org/issue/every-newborn/
https://www.healthynewbornnetwork.org/is...
. However, these rates may be underestimated due to underreporting of deaths1010 Barbeiro FMS, Fonseca SC, Tauffer MG, Ferreira MSS, Silva FP, Ventura PM, Quadros JI. Óbitos fetais no Brasil: revisão sistemática. Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49:22.. National data also reveal a reduction in the rate of neonatal deaths, from 25 per 1,000 live births in 1990 to 19 in 2000 and 9 in 2020, representing an annual rate of reduction of 3.6%77 United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF). Levels & trends in child mortality: report 2021. New York: UNICEF; 2021.. However, the rate of decline in early neonatal deaths (0-6 days) was slower than that of late neonatal deaths (7-28 days). This is due to a reduction in infectious diseases coupled with a relative increase in the proportion of deaths due to complications of prematurity1111 Menezes AMB, Barros FC, Horta BL, Matijasevich A, Bertoldi AD, Oliveira PD, Victora CG, Pelotas Cohorts Study Group. Stillbirth, newborn and infant mortality: trends and inequalities in four population-based birth cohorts in Pelotas, Brazil, 1982-2015. Int J Epidemiol 2019; 48(Suppl. 1):i54-i62..

Despite efforts to identify factors related to adverse obstetric prognosis, it is still not possible to accurately predict pregnancy outcomes. Nevertheless, when risk factors are detected, it is important to be alert to potential complications. Most national studies on this topic use secondary data from vital statistics systems, which are known to be prone to underreporting problems1212 Serra SC, Carvalho CA, Batista RFL, Thomaz EBAF, Viola PCAF, Silva AAMD, Simões VMF. Fatores associados à mortalidade perinatal em uma capital do Nordeste brasileiro. Cienc Saude Colet 2022; 27(4):1513-1524. and do not enable the identification of various risk factors. Using data from patient records enables the collection of more detailed information on both the mother and conceptus. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for perinatal death based on the analysis of maternal sociodemographic, pregnancy, and conceptus characteristics in a university referral hospital in Curitiba.

Methods

We conducted a case-control study in the Paraná Federal University Hospital (Complexo Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Paraná - CHC-UFPR) in Curitiba. We included births and fetal and early neonatal deaths occurring between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2017.

The sample size was calculated using the Fleiss method with continuity correction1313 Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 1981., adopting a 95% two-sided confidence interval (1-α), power (1-β) of 80%, control exposure proportion of 22%, 1:1 case-control ratio, and minimum detectable odds ratio of 1.70, resulting in a minimum sample of 305 cases and 305 controls. The sample was increased to 335 cases and 335 controls to account for potential losses and exclusions (5%) and to include the total number of perinatal deaths in the hospital over the five-year study period (2013-2017).

The case group consisted of perinatal deaths, comprising fetal and early neonatal deaths according to the definitions proposed by the International Classification of Diseases - 10th Revision (ICD-10)22 Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças e Problemas Relacionados à Saúde, CID-10. São Paulo: EDUSP; 1998. and Ministry of Health1414 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde (MS). Portaria de Consolidação no 1, de 28 de setembro de 2017. Diário Oficial da União 2017; 28 set.: gestational age of 22 completed weeks or birth weight ≥ 500 grams; intrauterine deaths and deaths occurring during the first seven days of life.

The control group was made up of newborns with a gestational age of at least 22 completed weeks or birth weight ≥ 500 grams based on the definition of newborn proposed by the ICD-1022 Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças e Problemas Relacionados à Saúde, CID-10. São Paulo: EDUSP; 1998. who did not die during the early neonatal period. The controls were randomly selected from newborns delivered in the hospital during the study period (n = 8,396). The number of controls selected in each year of the study period was proportional to the number of perinatal deaths in the same year. Before selecting the controls, newborns who died during the first seven days of life were excluded and included in the case group. The controls were therefore selected from 8,257 newborns.

The cases and control data were collected from the mothers’ and newborns’ physical patient records and entered into EpiData 4.6 (The EpiData Association, Denmark). Data analysis was performed using Stata 13.0 (Stata Corp., College Station, United States).

We used a hierarchical model, which is suited to the analysis of datasets with a large number of conceptually related variables1515 Lima S, Carvalho ML, Vasconcelos AGG. Proposta de modelo hierarquizado aplicado à investigação de fatores de risco de óbito infantil neonatal. Cad Saude Publica 2008; 24(8):1910-1916.. Hierarchical models are used to analyze distal, intermediate, and proximate determinants based on conceptual framework that describes the relationship between risk factors whose effect is direct or mediated through other factors1616 Victora CG, Huttly SR, Fuchs SC, Olinto MT. The role of conceptual frameworks in epidemiological analysis: a hierarchical approach. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26(1):224-227.. The variables analyzed by the present study were divided into four blocks:

Sociodemographic characteristics (distal block): maternal age and education level, mother’s marital status, and municipality of residence.

Maternal characteristics (intermediate block I): mother knew she was pregnant, smoking, drinking, and drug addiction, blood type, underlying conditions, number of pregnancies, history of miscarriage, fetal death or neonatal death in previous pregnancy.

Current pregnancy characteristics (intermediate block II): type of pregnancy (singleton; multiple), adequacy of antenatal care, admission during pregnancy, complications during pregnancy: preeclampsia or eclampsia, diabetes, thyroid disorders, chorioamnionitis, amniotic fluid volume changes, placental abruption, centralization of fetal blood flow, and use of pregnancy medications.

Conceptus characteristics (proximal block): sex, gestational age, birth weight, intrauterine fetal growth, and congenital malformation.

Gestational age was calculated using an algorithm: (a) early ultrasound (up to 20 + 6 weeks); (b) late ultrasound; (c) date of last menstrual period (LMP); (d) physical examination by a pediatrician (Capurro). Birth weight for gestational age was determined using the INTERGROWTH-21st intrauterine fetal growth curve1717 Intergrowth-21st. [cited 2022 mar 3]. Available from: http://intergrowth21.ndog.ox.ac.uk/pt
http://intergrowth21.ndog.ox.ac.uk/pt...
, adopting the following classifications: small for gestational age (SGA), appropriate for gestational age (AGA), and large for gestational age (LGA). Conceptuses with a gestational age of under 24 weeks or 43 weeks and over were not assessed and were included in the “ignored” category together with those where information on intrauterine growth was not available. Antenatal care was considered adequate when the expectant mother had attended 3 appointments up to 27 weeks of gestation, 4 appointments between 28 and 33 weeks of gestation, 5 appointments between 34 and 36 weeks of gestation, and 6 appointments up to 37 weeks or over. This classification was based on Ministry of Health recommendations stating that women should have at least six antenatal appointments during pregnancy, preferably one in the first trimester, two in the second, and three in the third1818 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde (MS). Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas. Pré-natal e puerpério: atenção qualificada e humanizada - manual técnico. Brasília: MS; 2006.. This classification is important to correct for potentially lower adequacy in cases of preterm birth1919 Domingues RM, Viellas EF, Dias MA, Torres JA, Theme-Filha MM, Gama SG, Leal MC. Adequação da assistência pré-natal segundo as características maternas no Brasil. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2015; 37(3):140-147..

First, univariate analysis was performed to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. The cut-off point for the inclusion of variables in the logistic regression model was p < 0.20. The multivariate analysis was performed using a hierarchical logistic regression model. The first stage was performed using the pre-selected variables from the sociodemographic characteristics and maternal characteristics blocks (p < 0.20). Those that obtained a p-value of < 0.05 were included in the second stage together with the variables from the current pregnancy characteristics block. The variables that obtained a p-value of < 0.05 were then included in the third stage together with the variables from the conceptus characteristics block. The variables that obtained a p-value of < 0.05 in at least one of the categories were included in the final model. The accuracy of the final model was estimated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve2020 Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978; 8(4):283-298..

The study protocol was approved by the University of São Paulo’s School of Public Health’s research ethics committee (reference nº 3.179.881).

Results

There were 335 perinatal deaths (196 fetal deaths and 139 early neonatal deaths) in the CHC-UFPR during the study period. After taking losses into account (missing mother or newborn medical records, inactive records, or cases that did not meet the inclusion criteria), the final sample was 316 perinatal deaths (183 fetal deaths and 133 early neonatal deaths) and 316 controls (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Flowchart of the case and control selection process. CHC-UFPR, 2013-2017.

With regard to sociodemographic characteristics, not residing in Curitiba was a possible risk factor for perinatal death (OR = 1.34; 95%CI: 0.96-1.86) and was included in the multivariate analysis (Table 1). With regard to maternal characteristics, the fact that the mother did not know she was pregnant (OR = 8.18; 95%CI: 1.01-66.52) and having blood types AB or B were associated with an increased risk of perinatal death (OR = 3.74; 95%CI: 1.18-11.91 and OR = 1.42; 95%CI: 0.85-2.37, respectively). Having an underlying condition was a protective factor for perinatal death (OR = 0.44; 95%CI: 0.30-0.63). The variables smoking, drinking, and drug addiction were not included in the next stage of the model. Being nulliparous and having had more than three pregnancies increased the risk of an adverse outcome in the current pregnancy. History of miscarriage, fetal death, and neonatal death also increased the risk of perinatal death (Table 1).

Table 1
Distribution (N and %) of cases and controls, odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), and p-values of the maternal sociodemographic, current pregnancy, and conceptus characteristics. CHC-UFPR, 2013-2017.

Regarding pregnancy characteristics, adequacy of antenatal care, use of pregnancy medications, and complications commonly found in high-risk pregnancies (preeclampsia or eclampsia, diabetes, thyroid disorders, chorioamnionitis, amniotic fluid volume changes, placental abruption, and centralization of fetal blood flow) were included in the next stage of the model. The variables type of pregnancy and admission during pregnancy were not included (Table 1).

All the variables from the conceptus characteristics block except sex (gestational age, birth weight, intrauterine fetal growth, and congenital malformation) were included in the next stage of the model (Table 1).

The first blocks included in the hierarchical logistic regression model were the sociodemographic characteristics and maternal characteristics. After adjustment, the variable municipality of residence continued to be associated with an increased risk of perinatal death. The only variable not selected from the maternal characteristics block was the expectant mother knew she was pregnant. Next, the variables from the current pregnancy characteristics block were added, with adequacy of antenatal care, amniotic fluid volume changes, and use of pregnancy medications being carried forward to the final stage, when the variables from the conceptus characteristics block were added. The variables maternal blood type, adequacy of antenatal care, gestational age, birth weight, and congenital malformation were included in the final model (Table 2). The area under the ROC curve2121 Hoo ZH, Candlish J, Teare D. What is an ROC curve? Emerg Med J 2017; 34(6):357-359. was 0.9652, suggesting that the proposed model is good predictor of perinatal death (Figure 2).

Table 2
Distribution (N and %) of cases and controls, crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), and p-values of maternal sociodemographic, current pregnancy, and conceptus characteristics. CHC-UFPR, 2013-2017.

Figure 2
ROC curve to estimate the accuracy of the multiple logistic regression model for predicting perinatal death with five independent variables. CHC-UFPR, 2013-2017.

In the final model, maternal blood types A, B and AB were a risk factor for perinatal death (OR = 1.07; 95%CI: 0.55-2.06, OR = 2.82; 95%CI: 1.07-7.43, OR = 3.49; 95%CI: 0.52-23.46, respectively); however, only the association between having B blood type and increased risk of death was statistically significant. Not attending and missing information on antenatal care were risk factors for perinatal death (OR = 30.78; 95%CI: 4.23-224.29 and OR = 24.97; 95%CI: 11.15-55.91, respectively) (Table 3).

Table 3
Results of the multiple logistic regression analysis, distribution (N and %) of cases and controls, adjusted odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (95%CI), and p-values of the variables. CHC-UFPR, 2013-2017.

The lower the gestational age at birth the higher the risk of death. There was a 24-fold increase in the risk of death among extremely preterm infants (OR = 24.21; 95%CI: 1.10-531.81) and a six-fold increase among very preterm infants (OR = 6.03; 95%CI: 1.34-27.17). Being moderately preterm was not a risk factor (OR = 1.75; 95%CI: 0.78-3.93). The results also show that the lower the birth weight, the greater the risk of perinatal death. There was a 52-fold increase in the risk of perinatal death among infants weighing less than 1,000g (OR = 51.94; 95%CI: 4.31-626.46). Congenital malformation was an important risk factor for perinatal death (OR = 63.90 and p-value <0.001) (Table 3).

Discussion

The findings show increased risk of perinatal death among mothers with B blood type and who did not attend antenatal care, and among infants born before 32 weeks of gestation, weighing less than 2,500g at birth, and with congenital birth defects.

The association between maternal blood type and adverse pregnancy outcomes has been reported in the literature; however, evidence is scarce and findings are often controversial. A systematic review of articles published between 1965 and 2015 identified higher risk of pre-eclampsia in mothers with a non-O blood type2222 Franchini M, Mengoli C, Lippi G. Relationship between ABO blood group and pregnancy complications: a systematic literature analysis. Blood Transfus 2016; 14(5):441-448., while a study in Turkey with 2,177 women reported an association between ABO blood types and low birth weight2323 Beyazit F, Pek E, Güngör AÇ, Gencer M, Unsal MA. Effect of maternal ABO blood type on birth weight and preeclampsia. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstetr Gynecol 2017; 6(6):2164-2167.. A multisite population-based case-control study in the United States involving 59 hospitals found an association between AB blood type and fetal death2424 Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Writing Group. Association between stillbirth and risk factors known at pregnancy confirmation. JAMA 2011; 306(22):2469-2479.. Our findings show an increased risk of perinatal death among mothers with B blood type. AB blood type was also associated with this outcome, but the association was not statistically significant in the final model. However, it is worth noting that AB is one of the rarest blood types and our sample power may not have been sufficient to confirm that this blood group is a risk factor for perinatal death. Further research is therefore needed to elucidate the influence of maternal blood type on perinatal death.

Our findings show that there was a 30-fold increase in the risk of perinatal death among women who did not attend antenatal care. Inadequate antenatal care also increased the chance of perinatal death, but the association was not statistically significant. Missing information on antenatal care in patient records was a significant risk factor for perinatal death, with missing information being more frequent in cases than controls (62% versus 15%) and in cases of fetal deaths than in neonatal deaths (95% versus 17%) (data not presented). This may be partially explained by the reluctance of professionals to record adverse outcomes2525 Schoeps D, Lefevre F, Silva ZP, Novaes HMD, Raspantini PR, Almeida MF. Representações sociais de médicos obstetras e neonatologistas sobre declaração de óbito fetal e neonatal precoce no município de São Paulo. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2014; 17(1):105-118.. A study with 1,815 women in Brazil using data from the Birth in Brazil survey (pesquisa Nascer no Brasil) revealed health inequities and low quality of care, despite high antenatal care coverage2626 Mario DN, Rigo L, Boclin KLS, Malvestio LMM, Anziliero D, Horta BL, Wehrmeister FC, Martínez-Mesa J. Qualidade do pré-natal no Brasil: Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013. Cien Saude Colet 2019; 24(3):1223-1232.. It is possible that some mothers in our sample did not attend antenatal care because they encountered difficulties accessing services. On the other hand, not attending antenatal care may also be an indication of difficulties accepting pregnancy. It is worth noting that 8 women in our sample did not know they were pregnant.

Conceptus characteristics were important factors in the present study, with three of the five variables from this block being included in the final model: gestational age under 32 weeks, low birth weight (< 2,500g), and congenital malformation, which are variables related to fetal viability.

The findings show that the risk of perinatal death increased with decreasing birth weight and gestational age. Conceptuses weighing less than 1,000g were 52 times more likely to die than those weighing ≥ 2,500g and there was a 24-fold increase in the risk of death among infants born before 28 weeks. The elevated risk of death among conceptuses with a low birth weight and preterm infants reflects the characteristics of the study population: 75% of the cases were preterm and had low birth weight, with 36.7% weighing under 1,000g. When these variables were included in the model, the associations between complications during pregnancy such as chorioamnionitis, amniotic fluid volume changes, and use of pregnancy medications and perinatal death lost their significance. This may be because these factors are part of the causal network that leads to prematurity and low birth weight. Similar findings were observed for infants born to mothers with a history of fetal death, which is another factor in the causal pathway to prematurity.

Congenital malformation resulted in a 64-fold increase in the chance of perinatal death in the final model. It is worth highlighting that almost half of the individuals in the case group had some type of congenital anomaly. Although approximately 50% of congenital anomalies cannot be linked to a specific cause, there are known risk factors for congenital malformation, including genetical, socioeconomic, and environmental factors, and infection2727 World Health Organization (WHO). Birth defects [Internet]. 2022. [cited 2023 fev 22]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/birth-defects
https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheet...
. Vital statistics in the United States over the past decade show that congenital birth defects accounted for 20% of child deaths in the country2828 Murphy SL, Mathews TJ, Martin JA, Minkovitz CS, Strobino DM. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2013-2014. Pediatrics 2017; 139(6):e20163239.. In Brazil, malformations are responsible for 22.8% of deaths during the first 4 weeks of life2929 Lansky S, Friche AAL, Silva AAM, Campos D, Bittecourt SDA, Carvalho ML, Frias PG, Cavalcante RS, Cunha AJLA. Pesquisa Nascer no Brasil: perfil da mortalidade neonatal e avaliação da assistência à gestante e ao recém-nascido. Cad Saude Publica 2014; 30(Supl. 1):S192-S207., which is close to rates in developed countries. It is estimated that about 94% of severe birth defects occur in low- and middle-income countries. Poor socioeconomic conditions are indirectly related to congenital anomalies due to increased risk of exposure to agents or factors such as infection and alcohol and poor access to sufficient nutritious foods and health care2727 World Health Organization (WHO). Birth defects [Internet]. 2022. [cited 2023 fev 22]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/birth-defects
https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheet...
. Infectious diseases associated with malformations include syphilis, which remains a major public health problem worldwide3030 Cooper JM, Sánchez PJ. Congenital syphilis. Semin Perinatol 2018; 42(3):176-184..

Although 33.2% of the conceptuses in the case group were SGA, this condition was not a risk factor when adjusted with the other variables. This may be because fetal growth restriction is one of the factors in the causal pathway to prematurity3131 Nardozza LMM, Zamarian ACP, Araujo E. New definition of fetal growth restriction: consensus regarding a major obstetric complication. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2017; 39(7):315-316.. Furthermore, the number of conceptuses with fetal growth restriction may be greater than shown as it was not possible to measure infants born before 24 weeks gestation (30 perinatal deaths) (data not presented).

The literature shows that one of the factors that increase pregnancy risk is extremes of maternal age. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 96 population-based studies showed that maternal age older than 35 years was associated with an increase of 65% in the odds of stillbirth when compared with younger women3232 Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, Frøen JF, Smith GC, Gibbons K, Coory M, Gordon A, Ellwood D, McIntyre HD, Fretts R, Ezzati M. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2011; 377(9774):1331-1340.. A study of 661,062 pregnant teenagers in the United States showed that teen pregnancies were associated with increased odds of preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, and congenital birth defects3333 Eliner Y, Gulersen M, Kasar A, Lenchner E, Grünebaum A, Chervenak FA, Bornstein E. Maternal and neonatal complications in teen pregnancies: a comprehensive study of 661,062 patients. J Adolesc Health 2022; 70(6):922-927.. In the present study, we observed a slight increase in the risk of perinatal death in women aged ≥ 35 years; however, the association was not statistically significant. Maternal education level has also been shown to be an important factor influencing maternal and child health. Data from the Birth in Brazil survey reveal an association between neonatal mortality and low maternal education level2929 Lansky S, Friche AAL, Silva AAM, Campos D, Bittecourt SDA, Carvalho ML, Frias PG, Cavalcante RS, Cunha AJLA. Pesquisa Nascer no Brasil: perfil da mortalidade neonatal e avaliação da assistência à gestante e ao recém-nascido. Cad Saude Publica 2014; 30(Supl. 1):S192-S207.. Our findings in contrast showed that the risk of perinatal death increased with increasing education level. Although this association was not statistically significant, this finding may be due to the specific characteristics of the study population. Many of the women with a higher level of education were attending private antenatal care services and were referred to the CHC-UFPR because they had conditions that are known to increase the risk of complications and need specialized care, such as congenital birth defects for example.

Smoking, drinking, and drug addiction were not shown to affect the odds of perinatal death. However, it is striking that almost 20% of the women were smokers. This is far higher than the rate in the general female population, which, according to the National Health Survey, was 9.8% in 20193434 Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Sistema IBGE de Recuperação Automática - SIDRA [Internet]. [cited 2022 mar 20]. Available from: https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/pesquisa/pns
https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/pesquisa/pns...
and 11% in 20133535 Malta DC, Vieira ML, Szwarcwald CL, Caixeta R, Brito SMF, Reis AAC. Tendência de fumantes na população Brasileira segundo a Pesquisa Nacional de Amostra de Domicílios 2008 e a Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2015; 18(Supl. 2):45-56.. In addition, 3.5% of women in the case group and 4.1% in the control group reported using drugs. In this respect, a meta-analysis of eight studies involving 626 women showed that drug use can lead to higher preterm birth rates and low birth weight3636 Kalaitzopoulos DR, Chatzistergiou K, Amylidi AL, Kokkinidis DG, Goulis DG. Effect of methamphetamine hydrochloride on pregnancy outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Addict Med 2018; 12(3):220-226..

Study limitations include missing information in the patient records, including sociodemographic data. As other studies have shown, lack of information in hospital records, especially pregnancy data3737 Campos MR, Leal MC, Souza Jr PR, Cunha CB. Consistência entre fontes de dados e confiabilidade interobservador do Estudo da Morbi-mortalidade e Atenção Peri e Neonatal no Município do Rio de Janeiro. Cad Saude Publica 2004; 20(Supl. 1):S34-S43., is common3737 Campos MR, Leal MC, Souza Jr PR, Cunha CB. Consistência entre fontes de dados e confiabilidade interobservador do Estudo da Morbi-mortalidade e Atenção Peri e Neonatal no Município do Rio de Janeiro. Cad Saude Publica 2004; 20(Supl. 1):S34-S43.,3838 Pavão ALB, Andrade D, Mendes W, Martins M, Travassos C. Estudo de incidência de eventos adversos hospitalares, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: avaliação da qualidade do prontuário do paciente. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2011; 14(4):651-661.. In the present study, missing information prevented the analysis of variables such as income, maternal nutritional status, and paternal age. All variables with information in more than 50% of the patient records were included, adopting the category “ignored” for cases where information was missing. However, missing information can either be due to the absence of the condition or the fact that the information was not recorded. Patient record notes are often written after the professional has seen the patient, resulting in recall bias or meaning that the information is not noted down. Another limitation is that the study was undertaken in a university hospital that receives patients with high-risk pregnancies, resulting in potential skewness in the data and higher prevalence of risk in the control group than in the general population, reducing the chance of confirming that this factor is a risk for perinatal death.

It can be concluded that preterm birth, low birth weight, and having congenital birth defects were the primary risk factors for perinatal death in the study sample, indicating that variables related to fetal viability are determining factors for this outcome. Despite the poor quality of patient records, the results suggest that adequate antenatal care is an important protective factor. The findings also show an association between ABO blood types, especially those with B antigens on the red blood cells, and perinatal death. However, further investigation is needed, including molecular research, to ascertain the relationship between the presence of B antigens and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

References

  • 1
    Rêgo MGS, Vilela MBR, Oliveira CM, Bonfim CV. Óbitos perinatais evitáveis por intervenções do Sistema Único de Saúde do Brasil. Rev Gaucha Enferm 2018;39:e2017-0084.
  • 2
    Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). Classificação Estatística Internacional de Doenças e Problemas Relacionados à Saúde, CID-10. São Paulo: EDUSP; 1998.
  • 3
    Bezerra IMP, Ramos JLS, Pianissola MC, Adami F, Rocha JBFD, Ribeiro MAL, Castro MR, Bezerra JDF, Smiderle FRN, Sousa LVA, Siqueira CE, Abreu LC. Perinatal mortality analysis in Espírito Santo, Brazil, 2008 to 2017. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18(21):11671.
  • 4
    Nobrega AA, Mendes YMMBE, Miranda MJ, Santos ACC, Lobo AP, Porto DL, França GVA . Mortalidade perinatal no Brasil em 2018: análise epidemiológica segundo a classificação de Wiggleworth modificada. Cad Saude Publica 2022; 38(1):e00003121.
  • 5
    Lansky S, França E, Leal MC. Mortalidade perinatal e evitabilidade: revisão da literatura. Rev Saude Publica 2002; 36(6):759-772.
  • 6
    Manjavidze T, Rylander C, Skjeldestad FE, Kazakhashvili N, Anda EE. Incidence and causes of perinatal mortality in Georgia. J Epidemiol Glob Health 2019; 9(3):163-168.
  • 7
    United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF). Levels & trends in child mortality: report 2021. New York: UNICEF; 2021.
  • 8
    United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF). A neglected tragedy: the global burden of stillbirths [Internet]. 2020. [cited 2022 mar 2]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/UN-IGME-2020-Stillbirth-Report-updated.pdf
    » https://data.unicef.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/UN-IGME-2020-Stillbirth-Report-updated.pdf
  • 9
    Healthy Newborn Network. Every Newborn [Internet]. 2018. [cited 2018 abr 24]. Available from: https://www.healthynewbornnetwork.org/issue/every-newborn/
    » https://www.healthynewbornnetwork.org/issue/every-newborn
  • 10
    Barbeiro FMS, Fonseca SC, Tauffer MG, Ferreira MSS, Silva FP, Ventura PM, Quadros JI. Óbitos fetais no Brasil: revisão sistemática. Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49:22.
  • 11
    Menezes AMB, Barros FC, Horta BL, Matijasevich A, Bertoldi AD, Oliveira PD, Victora CG, Pelotas Cohorts Study Group. Stillbirth, newborn and infant mortality: trends and inequalities in four population-based birth cohorts in Pelotas, Brazil, 1982-2015. Int J Epidemiol 2019; 48(Suppl. 1):i54-i62.
  • 12
    Serra SC, Carvalho CA, Batista RFL, Thomaz EBAF, Viola PCAF, Silva AAMD, Simões VMF. Fatores associados à mortalidade perinatal em uma capital do Nordeste brasileiro. Cienc Saude Colet 2022; 27(4):1513-1524.
  • 13
    Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 1981.
  • 14
    Brasil. Ministério da Saúde (MS). Portaria de Consolidação no 1, de 28 de setembro de 2017. Diário Oficial da União 2017; 28 set.
  • 15
    Lima S, Carvalho ML, Vasconcelos AGG. Proposta de modelo hierarquizado aplicado à investigação de fatores de risco de óbito infantil neonatal. Cad Saude Publica 2008; 24(8):1910-1916.
  • 16
    Victora CG, Huttly SR, Fuchs SC, Olinto MT. The role of conceptual frameworks in epidemiological analysis: a hierarchical approach. Int J Epidemiol 1997; 26(1):224-227.
  • 17
    Intergrowth-21st. [cited 2022 mar 3]. Available from: http://intergrowth21.ndog.ox.ac.uk/pt
    » http://intergrowth21.ndog.ox.ac.uk/pt
  • 18
    Brasil. Ministério da Saúde (MS). Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas. Pré-natal e puerpério: atenção qualificada e humanizada - manual técnico. Brasília: MS; 2006.
  • 19
    Domingues RM, Viellas EF, Dias MA, Torres JA, Theme-Filha MM, Gama SG, Leal MC. Adequação da assistência pré-natal segundo as características maternas no Brasil. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2015; 37(3):140-147.
  • 20
    Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978; 8(4):283-298.
  • 21
    Hoo ZH, Candlish J, Teare D. What is an ROC curve? Emerg Med J 2017; 34(6):357-359.
  • 22
    Franchini M, Mengoli C, Lippi G. Relationship between ABO blood group and pregnancy complications: a systematic literature analysis. Blood Transfus 2016; 14(5):441-448.
  • 23
    Beyazit F, Pek E, Güngör AÇ, Gencer M, Unsal MA. Effect of maternal ABO blood type on birth weight and preeclampsia. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstetr Gynecol 2017; 6(6):2164-2167.
  • 24
    Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network Writing Group. Association between stillbirth and risk factors known at pregnancy confirmation. JAMA 2011; 306(22):2469-2479.
  • 25
    Schoeps D, Lefevre F, Silva ZP, Novaes HMD, Raspantini PR, Almeida MF. Representações sociais de médicos obstetras e neonatologistas sobre declaração de óbito fetal e neonatal precoce no município de São Paulo. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2014; 17(1):105-118.
  • 26
    Mario DN, Rigo L, Boclin KLS, Malvestio LMM, Anziliero D, Horta BL, Wehrmeister FC, Martínez-Mesa J. Qualidade do pré-natal no Brasil: Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013. Cien Saude Colet 2019; 24(3):1223-1232.
  • 27
    World Health Organization (WHO). Birth defects [Internet]. 2022. [cited 2023 fev 22]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/birth-defects
    » https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/birth-defects
  • 28
    Murphy SL, Mathews TJ, Martin JA, Minkovitz CS, Strobino DM. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2013-2014. Pediatrics 2017; 139(6):e20163239.
  • 29
    Lansky S, Friche AAL, Silva AAM, Campos D, Bittecourt SDA, Carvalho ML, Frias PG, Cavalcante RS, Cunha AJLA. Pesquisa Nascer no Brasil: perfil da mortalidade neonatal e avaliação da assistência à gestante e ao recém-nascido. Cad Saude Publica 2014; 30(Supl. 1):S192-S207.
  • 30
    Cooper JM, Sánchez PJ. Congenital syphilis. Semin Perinatol 2018; 42(3):176-184.
  • 31
    Nardozza LMM, Zamarian ACP, Araujo E. New definition of fetal growth restriction: consensus regarding a major obstetric complication. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2017; 39(7):315-316.
  • 32
    Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, Frøen JF, Smith GC, Gibbons K, Coory M, Gordon A, Ellwood D, McIntyre HD, Fretts R, Ezzati M. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2011; 377(9774):1331-1340.
  • 33
    Eliner Y, Gulersen M, Kasar A, Lenchner E, Grünebaum A, Chervenak FA, Bornstein E. Maternal and neonatal complications in teen pregnancies: a comprehensive study of 661,062 patients. J Adolesc Health 2022; 70(6):922-927.
  • 34
    Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Sistema IBGE de Recuperação Automática - SIDRA [Internet]. [cited 2022 mar 20]. Available from: https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/pesquisa/pns
    » https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/pesquisa/pns
  • 35
    Malta DC, Vieira ML, Szwarcwald CL, Caixeta R, Brito SMF, Reis AAC. Tendência de fumantes na população Brasileira segundo a Pesquisa Nacional de Amostra de Domicílios 2008 e a Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2015; 18(Supl. 2):45-56.
  • 36
    Kalaitzopoulos DR, Chatzistergiou K, Amylidi AL, Kokkinidis DG, Goulis DG. Effect of methamphetamine hydrochloride on pregnancy outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Addict Med 2018; 12(3):220-226.
  • 37
    Campos MR, Leal MC, Souza Jr PR, Cunha CB. Consistência entre fontes de dados e confiabilidade interobservador do Estudo da Morbi-mortalidade e Atenção Peri e Neonatal no Município do Rio de Janeiro. Cad Saude Publica 2004; 20(Supl. 1):S34-S43.
  • 38
    Pavão ALB, Andrade D, Mendes W, Martins M, Travassos C. Estudo de incidência de eventos adversos hospitalares, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: avaliação da qualidade do prontuário do paciente. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2011; 14(4):651-661.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    07 Apr 2023
  • Date of issue
    Apr 2023

History

  • Received
    04 May 2022
  • Accepted
    28 Nov 2022
  • Published
    30 Nov 2022
ABRASCO - Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
E-mail: revscol@fiocruz.br