<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0042-9686</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Bulletin of the World Health Organization]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Bull World Health Organ]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0042-9686</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[World Health Organization]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0042-96862002000200002</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0042-96862002000200002</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Health and the economy: empowerment through evidence]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Frenk]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Julio]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Knaul]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Felicia]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Ministry of Health  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ DF]]></addr-line>
<country>Mexico</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Mexican Health Foundation Centre for Social and Economic Analysis ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ México DF]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2002</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2002</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>80</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>88</fpage>
<lpage>88</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0042-96862002000200002&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0042-96862002000200002&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0042-96862002000200002&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri></article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <P><B><FONT size=5><a name="home"></a>Health and the economy: empowerment through    evidence</FONT></B></P>     <P>&nbsp;</P>     <P>Julio Frenk<SUP><a href="#back">1</a></SUP> &amp; Felicia Knaul<SUP><a href="#back">2</a></SUP></P>     <P>Although evidence for the connection   between health and the economy is   increasing, most countries have still not   been able to exploit this link fully by   instituting effective public policies.   However, the<I> Report of the Commission on   Macroeconomics and Health </I>(CMH), released in December 2001, provides   governments and citizens alike with an   invaluable tool for formulating more   effective policies to fortify the myriad   complementarities between health and   the economy (<I>1</I>).</P>     <P>The CMH stresses that its<I> Report</I>   focuses on the low-income countries   and on the poor in middle-income   countries. However, its recommendations are relevant for the health systems   of all developing countries. For example,   the<I> Report </I>calls for key initiatives as part   of a new global strategy for investing in   health for economic development and   presents an action agenda for this   purpose. In particular, it recommends a   significant increase in the resources   spent on health and suggests an increase   in budgetary outlays for health in low-   and middle-income countries of 1% of   gross national product (GNP) by 2007   and of 2% by 2015. This increase must   come from domestic spending on health   and, in the case of low-income countries,   also from greatly expanded donor support. Furthermore, the<I> Report</I> finds that   while more efficient spending on health   is important and can eliminate waste,   poverty poses a fundamental constraint   on domestic resource mobilization in   most poor nations. The recommendation to increase investment in health is   an essential input to policy formulation   for both ministries of health and of   finance. In Mexico, for example, health   spending is currently estimated to be   5.6&#150;5.8% of gross domestic product   (GDP) (<I>Programa Nacional de Salud de   M&eacute;xico 2001-2006</I>), below the average of   6.1% for Latin America, which includes   several countries with much lower per   capita incomes. The Government of   Mexico is striving for fiscal reforms that   would enable an increase of more than   1% of GDP in government spending on   health over the next five years.</P>     <P>Another recommendation of the<I> Report </I>is a reduction in out-of-pocket    spending on health services and the channelling of community financing into    pre-payment schemes. This is based on the substantial theoretical and empirical    evidence that out-of-pocket spending is one of the least efficient and most    inequitable means of financing health care.<SUP><a href="#back">a</a><a name="a"></a></SUP>    Again, this recommendation is highly applicable to middle-income countries,    where social insurance systems are often present but apply only to formal sector    workers. Typically, a substantial proportion of financing for health in such    countries is derived from out-of-pocket payments, largely contributed by the    uninsured poor, and often leads to impoverishing expenditures that contribute    little to better health. In Mexico, for example, more than half of total health    expenditure comes from out-of-pocket spending by households. A strategic line    of action of the current Government of Mexico has been to increase public outlays    for health care and to convert out-of-pocket spending into pooled pre-payments    organized via demand-side subsidies through publicly financed health insurance    for the uninsured, informal sector workers, and those who have no stable source    of income.</P>     <P>The work of the CMH and its six   working groups touches on each of the   many linkages between health and the   economy, many of which have not   previously been thoroughly developed   in academic or policy work. The areas   where the least research is available and   where future efforts should focus on are   the effect of the health system on   economic conditions through trade and   the impact of the health system on the   economic system through, for example,   health and fiscal policy.</P>     <P>The<I> Report</I> calls for the establishment of national CMHs in developing   countries that would be chaired jointly   by ministers of health and finance. These   national bodies would be reinforced by   regional counterparts that could foster   stronger links between regional health   organizations, such as the Pan American   Health Organization (PAHO), and regional economic entities, including   trading blocks such as the North   American Free Trade Association   (NAFTA) and Mercado Com&uacute;n del Sur   (MERCOSUR), as well as UN economic   commissions and development banks.   These regional bodies and working   groups, in conjunction with national   CMHs, could make great strides towards   developing effective policies to deal with   regional linkages between health and   economic development, especially those   surrounding trade.</P>     <P>The<I> Report</I> stresses that health is an   intrinsically valued goal. At the same   time, it provides powerful evidence   about its instrumental value in furthering   economic growth. This conclusion can   empower health decision-makers by   drawing the attention of economics   decision-makers to the linkages between   health and the economy. Directing   greater political attention and financial   resources to health is an overdue   requirement for equity and sustainability   in our globalized world. <font face="Monotype Sorts">n</font></P>     <P>&nbsp; </P>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P><B><font size="4">Reference</font></B></P>     <P> 1. <I>Macroeconomics and health: investing in health for economic development.    Report of the Commission on Macroeconomics and Health. </I>Geneva: World Health    Organization; 2001.</P>     <P>&nbsp;</P>     <P></P>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <P><SUP><a name="back"></a><a href="#home">1</a></SUP> Minister of Health, Ministry    of Health, Mexico DF, Mexico.    <br>   <SUP><a href="#home">2</a></SUP> Formerly: Director, Centre for Social and Economic    Analysis, Mexican Health Foundation, Perif&eacute;rico Sur 4809, El Arenal Tepepan,    M&eacute;xico DF 14610 (email: <a href="mailto:knaul@attglobal.net">knaul@attglobal.net</a>).    Correspondence should be addressed to this author.    <br>   <SUP><a href="#a">a</a></SUP> Much of this evidence is summarized in: <I>The    world health report 2000 &#151; Health systems: improving performance.</I> Geneva:    World Health Organization; 2000.    <br>   Ref. No.<B> 01-1639</B></P>      ]]></body>
</article>
