SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Article References

CORREA, Rosangela da Silveira et al. Efetividade de programa de controle de qualidade em mamografia para o Sistema Único de Saúde. Rev. Saúde Pública [online]. 2012, vol.46, n.5, pp. 769-776. ISSN 0034-8910.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102012000500002.

    1. Avramova-Cholakova S, Vassileva J. A survey of the state of mammography practice in Bulgaria. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011;147(1-2):14-6. DOI:10.1093/rpd/ncr320 [ Links ]

    2. Azevedo AC. Avaliação de desempenho de serviços de saúde. Rev Saude Publica. 1991;25(1):64-71. DOI:10.1590/S0034-89101991000100013 [ Links ]

    3. Corrêa RS, Peixoto JE, Silver LD, Dias CM, Nogueira MS, Hwang SF, et al. Impacto de um programa de avaliação da qualidade da imagem nos serviços de mamografia do Distrito Federal. Radiol Bras. 2008;41(2):109-14. DOI:10.1590/S0100-39842008000200010. [ Links ]

    4. Corrêa RS, Freitas-Júnior R, Peixoto JE, Rodrigues DCN, Lemos MEF, Marins LAP, et al. Estimativas da cobertura mamográfica no estado de Goiás, Brasil. Cad Saude Publica. 2011;27(9):1757-67. DOI:10.1590/S0102-311X2011000900009 [ Links ]

    5. Feig SA. Screening mammography: a successful public health initiative. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2006;20(2-3):125-33. DOI:10.1590/S1020-49892006000800009 [ Links ]

    6. Food and Drug Administration (US). The Mammography Quality Standards Act (MQSA) interim final rules. Silver Spring; 1993. [ Links ]

    7. Gershan V, Antevska-Grujoska S. Performance of mammography equipment in the Macedonian breast screening campaign 2008/2009. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011;147(1-2):187-91. DOI:10.1093/rpd/ncr290 [ Links ]

    8. Hendrick RE, Klabunde C, Grivegnee A, Pou G, Ballard-Barbash R. Technical quality control practices in mammography screening programs in 22 countries. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002;14(3):219-26. [ Links ]

    9. Hendrick RE, Helvie MA. United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(2):W112-6. DOI:10.2214/AJR.10.5609 [ Links ]

    10. Koch HA, Peixoto JE, Neves ALE. Análise da infra-estrutura para a mamografia no Brasil. Radiol Bras. 2000;33(1):23-30. [ Links ]

    11. Magalhães LAG, Azevedo ACP, Carvalho ACP. A importância do controle de qualidade de processadoras automáticas. Radiol Bras. 2002;35(6):357-63. DOI:10.1590/S0100-39842002000600009 [ Links ]

    12. Milano F, Maggi E, Roselli del Turco M. Evaluation of the effect of a quality control programme in mammography on technical and exposure parameters. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2000;90(1-2):263-6. [ Links ]

    13. Oliveira M, Nogueira MS, Guedes E, Andrade MC, Peixoto JE, Joana GS, et al. Average glandular dose and phantom image quality in mammography. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2007;580(1):574-7. DOI:10.1016/j.nima.2007.05.228. [ Links ]

    14. Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Teppo L, Thomas DB, editors. Cancer incidence in five continents. Lyon: IARC; 2002. (IARC Scientific Publication, 155). [ Links ]

    15. Perry N, Broeders M, Wolf C, Törnberg S, Holland R., von Karsa L, editors. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. 4. ed. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2006. [ Links ]

    16. Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L. Periodic screening for breast cancer: the Health Insurance Plan Project and its sequelae, 1963-1986. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1988. [ Links ]

    17. Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen HH, Duffy SW, Yen MF, Chiang CF, et al. The Swedish Two-County Trial twenty years later. Updated mortality results and new insights from long-term follow-up. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000;38(4):625-51. DOI:10.1016/S0033-8389(05)70191-3 [ Links ]