PYRRHO, Monique
 andÂ
SCHRAMM, Fermin Roland. A moralidade da nanotecnologia. Cad. Saúde Pública [online].
2012,
vol.28, n.11, pp. 2023-2033.
ISSN 0102-311X.Â
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2012001100002.
|
|
2. Buzea C, Blandino IIP, Robbie K. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles: sources and toxicity. Biointerphases 2007; 2:MR17-172. [ Links ] 3. Bhattacharyya D, Singh S, Satnalika N, Khandelwal A, Jeon SH. Nanotechnology, big things from a tiny world: a review. International Journal of u- and e- Service, Science and Technology 2009; 2:29-38. [ Links ] 4. Kostoff RN, Koytcheff RG, Lau CGY. Structure of the nanoscience and nanotechnology applications literature. J Technol Transf 2008; 33:472-84. [ Links ] 5. MacNaghten P, Guivant JS. Converging citizens? Nanotechnology and the political imaginary of public engagement in Brazil and the United Kingdom. Public Underst Sci 2011; 20:207-20. [ Links ] 6. Kuhlbusch TAJ, Asbach C, Fissan H, Göhler D, Stintz M. Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: a review. Part Fibre Toxicol 2011; 8:1-18. [ Links ] 7. Hubbs AF, Mercer RR, Benkovic SA, Harkema J, Sriram K, Schwegler-Berry D, et al. Nanotoxicology a pathologist's perspective. Toxicol Pathol 2011; 39:301-24. [ Links ] 8. Proffitt F. Yellow light for nanotech. Science 2004; 305:762. [ Links ] 9. Service RF. Nanotechnology grows up. Science 2004; 304:1732-4. [ Links ] 10. Raj B. Regulating nanomedicine can the FDA handle it? Curr Drug Deliv 2011; 8:227-34. [ Links ] 11. Mauter MS, Elimelech M. Environmental applications of carbon-based nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 2008; 42:5843-59. [ Links ] 12. Klaine SJ, Alvarez PJJ, Batley GE, Fernandes TF, Handy RD, Lyon DY, et al. Nanomaterials in the environment: behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 2008; 27:1825-51. [ Links ] 13. Salvarezza RC. Why is nanotechnology important for developing countries? In: Proceedings of the Third Session of the World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology. Rio de Janeiro: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; 2003. p. 134-6. [ Links ] 14. Schramm FR. Paradigma biotecnocientífico e paradigma bioético. In: Oda LM, organizadora. Biosafety of transgenic organisms in human health products. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; 1996. p. 109-27. [ Links ] 15. Jotterand F. Nanotechnology, bioethics and the techno-scientific revolution: philosophical and ethical assessment of nanotechnology and its applications in medicine [Doctoral Dissertation]. Houston: Rice University; 2005. [ Links ] 16. Overly D. Lonely hearts of the cosmos: the scientific quest for the secret of the universe. New York: Harper Collins; 1991. [ Links ] 17. Schramm FR. Bioética, biossegurança e a questão da interface no controle das práticas da biotecnociência: uma introdução. Redbioética 2010; 1: 99-110. [ Links ] 18. Wickson F, Grieger K, Baun A. Nature and nanotechnology: science, ideology and policy. International Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society 2010; 8:5-23. [ Links ] 19. Olivé L. El bien, el mal y la razón: facetas de la ciencia y de la tecnología. México DF: Paidós; 2000. [ Links ] 20. Schramm FR. Existem boas razões para se temer a biotecnociência? Bioethikos 2010; 4:189-97. [ Links ] 21. Fischer M. Futuros antropológicos: redefinindo a cultura na era tecnológica. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar Editor; 2011. [ Links ] 22. Khushf G. The ethics of NBIC convergence. J Med Philos 2007; 32:185-96. [ Links ] 23. Litton P. 'Nanoethics'? What's new? Hastings Cent Rep 2007; 37:22-5. [ Links ] 24. Nordmann A. If and then: a critique of speculative nanoethics. Nanoethics 2007; 1:31-46. [ Links ] 25. Allhoff F. On the autonomy and justification of nanoethics. Nanoethics 2007; 1:185-210. [ Links ] 26. Nordmann A. Molecular disjunctions: staking claims at the nanoscale. In: Baird D, Nordmann A, Schummer J, editors. Discovering the nanoscale. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2004. p. 51-62. [ Links ] 27. Stirling A. Risk, precaution and science: towards a more constructive policy. EMBO Rep 2007; 8: 309-15. [ Links ] 28. Ferrari A. Developments in the debate on nanoethics: traditional approaches and the need for new kinds of analysis. Nanoethics 2010; 4:27-52. [ Links ] 29. Clift R. Nanotechnology: an example of risk management and regulation in an emerging technology. In: Proceedings of Special Session of the Joint Meeting: Potential Implications of Manufactured Nanomaterials for Human Health and Environmental Safety; 2005. http://sei.nnin.org/doc/resource/clift%20report.pdf (acessado em 10/Fev/2012). [ Links ] 30. Weckert J, Moor J. The precautionary principle in nanotechnology. Int J Appl Philos 2006; 20: 191-204. [ Links ] 31. Grunwald A. Nanotechnology: a new field of ethical inquiry? Sci Eng Ethics 2005; 11:187-201. [ Links ] 32. Harris J, Holm S. Extending human lifespan and the precautionary paradox. J Med Philos 2002; 27:355-68. [ Links ] 33. Holm S. Reply to Sandin: the paradox of precaution is not dispelled by attention to context. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2006; 15:184-7. [ Links ] 34. Peterson M. The precautionary principle is incoherent. Risk Anal 2006; 26:595-601. [ Links ] 35. Sandler R. Nanotechnology: the social and ethical issues. Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Project on Emerging Technologies; 2009. http://www.nanotechproject.org/process/assets/files/7060/nano_pen16_final.pdf (acessado em 10/Fev/2012). [ Links ] 36. Sparrow R. Revolutionary and familiar, inevitable and precarious: rhetorical contradictions in enthusiasm for nanotechnology. Nanoethics 2007; 1:57-68. [ Links ] 37. Pyrrho M. Nanotechnology and ethics: assessing the unforeseeable. In: Rudnick A, editor. Bioethics in the 21st century. Rijeka: Intech; 2011. p. 121-38. [ Links ] 38. National Science and Technology Council. National Nanotechnology Initiative: leading to the next industrial revolution: a report by the Interagency Working Group on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology Committee on Technology; 2000. http://clinton4.nara.gov/WH/New/html/20000121_4.html (acessado em 09/Fev/2012). [ Links ] 39. Drexler KE. Nanotechnology: from Feynman to funding. Bull Sci Technol Soc 2004; 24:21-7. [ Links ] 40. Bostrom N. Technological revolutions: ethics and policy in the dark. In: Cameron NMS, Mitchell ME, editors. Nanoscale: issues and perspectives for the nanocentury. New Jersey: Wiley; 2007. p. 129-52. [ Links ] 41. Roco MC. Nanotechnology: from discovery to innovation and socioeconomic projects. Chem Eng Process 2011; 171:21-7. [ Links ] 42. Roco MC. International strategy for nanotechnology. J Nanopart Res 2001; 3:353-60. [ Links ] 43. Wonglimpiyarat J. Nanotechnology: a successive industrial revolution of Schumpeter's long wave theory. International Journal of Nanotechnology 2004; 1:480-90. [ Links ] 44. Franklin S. Science as culture, cultures of science. Annu Rev Anthropol 1995; 24:163-84. [ Links ] 45. Nelkin D, Lindee MS. The DNA mystique: the gene as a cultural icon. New York: Freeman; 1995. [ Links ] 46. Zebrowski, Robin L. Altering the body: nanotechnology and human nature. Int J Appl Philos 2006; 20:229-46. [ Links ] 47. Lin P, Allhoff F. Nanoethics and human enhancement: a critical evaluation of recent arguments. Nanotech Perceptions 2006; 2:47-52. [ Links ] 48. Liu Y, Yan H. Designer curvature. Science 2009; 325:685-6. [ Links ] 49. Aldaye FA, Palmer AL, Sleiman HF. Assembling materials with DNA as the guide. Science 2008; 321:1795-9. [ Links ] 50. Koyrè A. As origens da ciência moderna: uma nova interpretação. In: Koyrè A, organizador. Estudos de história do pensamento científico. 2ª Ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense Universitária; 1991. p. 56-79. [ Links ] 51. Schramm FR. Bioética e moralidade das biotecnologias. In: Emerick MC, Valle S, Costa MAF, coordendores. Gestão biotecnológica: alguns tópicos. Rio de Janeiro: Interciência; 1999. p. 123-30. [ Links ] 52. Thodey K, Smolke CD. Bringing it together with RNA. Science 2011; 333:412-3. [ Links ] |