SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Article References

FIGUEIRO, Ana Cláudia; HARTZ, Zulmira; SAMICO, Isabella  and  CESSE, Eduarda Angela Pessoa. Usos e influência da avaliação em saúde em dois estudos sobre o Programa Nacional de Controle da Dengue. Cad. Saúde Pública [online]. 2012, vol.28, n.11, pp. 2095-2105. ISSN 0102-311X.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2012001100009.

    1. Weiss CH. Where politics and evaluation research meet. Am J Eval 1993; 14:93-106. [ Links ]

    2. Preskill H, Caracelli V. Current and developing conceptions of use: evaluation use tig survey results. Am J Eval 1997; 18:209-25. [ Links ]

    3. Braga C, Albuquerque MFPM, Morais HM. A produção do conhecimento científico e as políticas de saúde pública: reflexões a partir da ocorrência da filariose na cidade do Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública 2004; 20:351-61. [ Links ]

    4. Weiss CH. The interface between evaluation and public policy. Evaluation 1999; 5:468-86. [ Links ]

    5. Champagne F. The use of cientific evidence and knowledge by managers. Groupe de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Santé, N99-01. http://www.gris.umontreal.ca/rapportpdf/N99-01.pdf (acessado em 12/Jan/2010). [ Links ]

    6. Weiss CH, Murphy-Graham E, Birkeland S. An alternative route to policy influence: how evaluations affect D.A.R.E. Am J Eval 2005; 26:12-30. [ Links ]

    7. Kirkhart KE. Reconceptualizing evaluation use: an integrated theory of influence. New Directions for Evaluation 2000; 88:5-23. [ Links ]

    8. Mark MM, Henry GT. The mechanisms and outcomes of evaluation influence. Evaluation 2004; 10:35-57. [ Links ]

    9. Henry GT, Mark MM. Beyond USE: understanding evaluation's influence on attitudes and actions. Am J Eval 2003; 24:293-314. [ Links ]

    10. Denis JL, Lehoux P, Champagne F. A knowledge utilization perspective on fine-tuning dissemination and contextualizing knowledge. In: Lemieux-Charles L, Champagne F, editors. Using knowledge and evidence in health care: multidisciplinary perspectives. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2004. p. 1-40. [ Links ]

    11. Boaz A, Hayden C. Pro-active evaluators: enabling research to be useful, usable and used. Evaluation 2002; 8:440-53. [ Links ]

    12. Patton MQ. The challenges of making evaluation useful. Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação 2005; 13:67-78. [ Links ]

    13. Patton MQ. Evaluate development, develop evaluation: a pathway to Africa's future seven misconceptions and lessons learned. http://www.pnud.ne/rense/AfrEA%202007/AfrEA2007_Pl%E9ni%E8res/Presentation_MQP.pdf (acessado em 07/Nov/2009). [ Links ]

    14. Patton MQ. Utilization-focused evaluation: the new century text. 3rd Ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1997. [ Links ]

    15. Mark MM, Henry GT, Julnes G. Evaluation: an integrated framework for understanding, guiding, and improving policies and programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2000. [ Links ]

    16. Alkin MC. Evaluation roots: tracing theorists' views and influences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2004. [ Links ]

    17. Pouvourville G. Public health research: between science and action? Cad Saúde Pública 1999; 15:889-94. [ Links ]

    18. Trostle J, Bronfman M, Langer A. How do researchers influence decision makers? Case studies of Mexican policies. Health Policy Plann 1999; 14:103-14. [ Links ]

    19. Garcia RC. Subsídios para organizar avaliações da ação governamental. Brasília: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada; 2001. (Texto para Discussão, 776). [ Links ]

    20. Latour B. A esperança de pandora. São Paulo: EDUSC; 2001. [ Links ]

    21. Hartz ZMA, Contandriopoulos AP. Do quê ao pra quê da meta-avaliação em saúde. In: Hartz ZMA, Vieira-da-Silva LM, Felisberto E, organizadores. Meta-avaliação da atenção básica em Saúde: teoria e prática. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz; 2008. p. 27-45. [ Links ]

    22. Hartz ZMA, Denis JL, Moreira E, Matida A. From knowledge to action: challenges and opportunities for increasing the use of evaluation in health promotion policies and practices. In: McQueen DV, Potvin L, editors. Health promotion evaluation practices in the Americas: values and research. New York: Springer; 2008. p. 101-20. [ Links ]

    23. Weiss CH. Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation? Am J Eval 1998; 19:21-33. [ Links ]

    24. Feinstein O. Use of evaluations and evaluations of their use. Evaluation 2002; 8:433-9. [ Links ]

    25. Figueiró AC, Sóter AP, Braga C, Hartz ZMA, Samico I. Análise da lógica de intervenção do Programa Nacional de Controle da Dengue. Rev Bras Saúde Matern Infant 2010; 10 Suppl 1:93-106. [ Links ]

    26. Champagne F, Brousselle A, Hartz Z, Contandriopoulos AP. La modélisation des interventions. In: Brousselle A, Champagne F, Contandriopoulos AP, Hartz Z, editors. Concepts et méthodes d'évaluation des interventions. Montreal: Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal; 2009. p. 57-72. [ Links ]

    27. Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde. Dengue. Documento Técnico, 44. http://www.paho.org/spanish/gov/cd/cd44-14-s.pdf (acessado em 14/Dez/2009). [ Links ]

    28. Figueiró AC, Hartz ZMA, Brito CAA, Samico I, Siqueira Filha NT, Cazarin G, et al. Óbito por dengue como evento sentinela para avaliação da qualidade da assistência: estudo de caso em dois municípios da Região Nordeste, Brasil, 2008. Cad Saúde Pública 2011; 27:2373-85. [ Links ]

    29. Felisberto E, Freese E, Alves CKA, Bezerra LCA, Samico I. Análise da sustentabilidade de uma política de avaliação: o caso da atenção básica no Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública 2010; 26:1079-95. [ Links ]

    30. Kropf SP, Ferreira LO. A prática da ciência: uma etnografia no laboratório. Hist Ciênc Saúde-Manguinhos; 1998; 4:597-8. [ Links ]

    31. Preskill H, Torres RT. Building capacity for organizational learning through evaluative inquiry. Evaluation 1999; 5:42-60. [ Links ]

    32. Torres RT, Preskill H. Evaluation and organizational learning: past, present, and future. Am J Eval 2001; 22:387-95. [ Links ]

    33. Thoenig JC. Avaliação como conhecimento utilizável para reformas de gestão pública. Revista do Serviço Público 2000; 51:55-72. [ Links ]

    34. Cousins JB, Leithwood KA. Current empirical research on evaluation utilization. Review of Educational Research 1986; 56:331-64. [ Links ]

    35. Johnson K, Greenseid LO, Toal SA, King JA, Lawrenz F, Volkov B. Research on evaluation use: a review of the empirical literature from 1986 to 2005. Am J Eval 2009; 30:377-410. [ Links ]

    36. Callon M, Latour B. Les paradoxes de la modernité. Comment concevoir les innovations? Clés pour l'analyse sociotechnicque. Prospective et Santé 1986; 36:13-29. [ Links ]

    37. Shulha LM, Cousins JB. Evaluation use: theory, research, and practice since 1986. Eval Pract 1997, 8:195-208. [ Links ]

    38. Russell S, Williams R. Social shaping of technology: frameworks, findings and implications for policy. In: Sørensen K, Williams R, editors. Shaping technology, guiding policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2002. p. 37-131. [ Links ]

    39. Caracelli VJ. Evaluation use at the threshold of the twenty-first century. New Directions for Evaluation 2000; 88:99-112. [ Links ]

    40. Rossman GB, Rallis SF. Critical inquiry and use as action. New Directions for Evaluation 2000; 88: 55-70. [ Links ]