SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Article References

GARCIA, Ana M.; BORRELL, Carme  and  COMITE EDITORIAL DE GACETA SANITARIA. En defensa de GACETA SANITARIA. Gac Sanit [online]. 2012, vol.26, n.2, pp. 105-106. ISSN 0213-9111.

    1. Horton R. The Lancet's ombudsman. The Lancet. 1996; 348:6. [ Links ]

    2. Herxheimer A. Make scientific journals more responsive - and responsible. Scientist. 1989; 20:9-11. [ Links ]

    3. Altman D.G., Chalmers I., Herxhemier A. Is there a case for an international medical scientific press council?. JAMA. 1994; 272:166-8. [ Links ]

    4. Pérez Fernández M. La defensora del lector y del autor. SEMERGEN. 2001; 27:173. [ Links ]

    5. García A.M. Autores, revisores, editores: las reglas del juego. Gac Sanit. 2001; 15:294-5. [ Links ]

    6. Sherwood T. Lancet ombudsman's first report. Lancet. 1997; 350:4-5. [ Links ]

    7. Warlow C. Ombudsman's ninth report. Lancet. 2011; 378:548-9. [ Links ]

    8. Dossetor J.B. Report of the ombudsman-ethicist, 2002. CMAJ. 2003; 169:674-5. [ Links ]

    9. Satyanarayana K, editor. Reflections of a pioneering ombudsman at an Indian journal. Science Editor. 2004;27:117–9. [ Links ]

    10. Pérez Fernández M. La defensora del lector y del autor de la revista SEMERGEN - una sombra nada más. SEMERGEN. 2003; 31:387-8. [ Links ]

    11. Albert T. Why bother with peer review?. Lancet. 1997; 350:822. [ Links ]

    12. Carter R. Ombudsman's sixth report. Lancet. 2002; 360:272. [ Links ]

    13. Fernández E. GACETA SANITARIA: nuestra revista para la salud pública local y global. Gac Sanit. 2004; 18:257-9. [ Links ]