SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Article References

BONILLO, Albert. Pruebas de acceso a la formación sanitaria especializada para médicos y otros profesionales sanitarios en España: examinando el examen y los examinados. Gac Sanit [online]. 2012, vol.26, n.3, pp. 231-235. ISSN 0213-9111.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2011.09.020.

    1. Programas de Formación Sanitaria Especializada. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo. (Consultado el 8/6/11.) Disponible en: http://sis.msc.es. [ Links ]

    2. Vázquez G, Murillo F, Gómez J, et al. El examen MIR, su cambio como una opción estratégica. Educ Med. 2008; 11:203-6. [ Links ]

    3. Torres M, Cardellach F, Bundó M, et al. Sistema formativo MIR: propuesta de cambios para la adecuación a las necesidades del modelo sanitario. Med Clin (Barc). 2008; 131:777-82. [ Links ]

    4. Gómez-Sáez JM, Pujol-Farriols R, Martínez-Carretero JM, et al. El proyecto COMBELL. Un análisis de la competencia clínica médica. Med Clin (Barc). 1995; 105:649-51. [ Links ]

    5. Haladyna TM, Downing SM, Rodríguez M. A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment. Applied Measurement in Education. 2002; 15:309-33. [ Links ]

    6. Moreno R, Martínez R, Muñiz J. Directrices para la construcción de ítems de elección múltiple. Psicothema. 2004; 16:490-7. [ Links ]

    7. Downing SM. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on test and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2005; 10:133-43. [ Links ]

    8. Stagnaro-Green A, Downing SM. Use of flawed multiple-choice items by the New England Journal of Medicine for continuing medical education. Med Teach. 2006; 28:566-8. [ Links ]

    9. Beullens J, Van Damme B, Jaspaert H, et al. Are extended-matching multiple-choice items appropriate for a final test in medical education?. Med Teach. 2002; 24:390-5. [ Links ]

    10. Muñiz J. Teoría clásica de los test. 5a ed. Madrid: Pirámide; 1998. 387 p. [ Links ]

    11. Page A. Elementos de psicometría. Madrid: Eudema; 1993. 128 p. [ Links ]

    12. Guilbert JJ. Educational handbook for health Personnel. 5th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1987. 362 p. [ Links ]

    13. Ebel RL. The reliability of an index of item discrimination. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1951; 11:403-8. [ Links ]

    14. Murphy KR, Davidshofer CO. Psychological testing: principles and applications. 6th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2004. 624 p. [ Links ]

    15. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1986. 380 p. [ Links ]

    16. Rodríguez MC. Three options are optimal for multiple-choice items: a meta-analysis of 80 years of research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 2005; 24:3-13. [ Links ]

    17. Budescu DV, Nevo B. Optimal number of options: an investigation of the assumption of proportionality. Journal of Educational Measurement. 1985; 22:183-96. [ Links ]

    18. Alonso MI. La gestión del proceso de convocatoria de plazas de formación médica especializada. Gac Sanit. 2003; 17:289-95. [ Links ]

    19. Gual A, Pardell H, coordinadores. El médico del futuro. Barcelona: Fundación Educación Médica (FEM); 2009. 100 p. [ Links ]