SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Article References

MARODIN, Gabriela; FRANCA, Paulo; ROCHA, Jose Claudio Casali da  and  CAMPOS, Antonio Hugo. Biobanking for health research in Brazil: present challenges and future directions. Rev Panam Salud Publica [online]. 2012, vol.31, n.6, pp.523-528. ISSN 1680-5348.

    1. National Health Council, Brasil. National Health Council Resolution CNS 347/05 on research using human biologic material. Available from Accessed 1 March 2011. [ Links ]

    2. National Health Council, Brasil. National Health Council Resolution 196/96 on research involving human subjects. Available from Accessed 1 March 2011. [ Links ]

    3. National Health Council, Brasil. National Health Council Resolution 292/99 on research with foreign cooperation. Available from Accessed 1 March 2011. [ Links ]

    4. National Health Council, Brasil. National Health Council Resolution 340/04 on human genetics. Available from Accessed 1 March 2011. [ Links ]

    5. Bell WC, Sexton KC, Grizzle WE. How to efficiently obtain human tissues to support specific biomedical research projects. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1676-9. [ Links ]

    6. Wallace SE, Kent A. Population biobanks and returning individual research results: mission impossible or new directions? Hum Genet. 2011;130(3):393-401. [ Links ]

    7. Peakman T, Elliott P. Current standards for the storage of human samples in biobanks. Genome Med. 2010;2(10):72. [ Links ]

    8. Knoppers BM, Harris JR, Tassé AM, Budin-Ljøsne I, Kaye J, Deschênes M, et al. Towards a data sharing Code of Conduct for international genomic research. Genome Med. 2011;3(7):46. [ Links ]

    9. Department of Health of the Government of Western Australia. Guidelines for human biobanks, genetic research databases, and associated data. Available from Accessed 20 December 2011. [ Links ]

    10. Ministério da Saúde do Brasil. Diretrizes Nacionais para Biorrepositório e Biobanco de Material Biológico Humano com Finalidade de Pesquisa. Portaria No 2.201, de 14 de Setembro de 2011. Available from HEID=59b00d80485acdbc8570b563a415c32e Accessed 20 December 2011. [ Links ]

    11. Comissão Nacional de Ética em Pesquisa do Conselho Nacional de Saúde, Brasil. Resolução CNS 441/11 sobre armazenamento de material biologico humano com finalidade de pesquisa. Available from Accessed 20 December 2011. [ Links ]

    12. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Guidelines on human biobanks and genetic research databases. Available from Accessed 1 March 2011. [ Links ]

    13. World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Common minimal technical standards and protocols for biological resource centres dedicated to cancer research. Caboux E, Plymoth A, Hainaut P, eds. Available from Accessed 1 March 2011. [ Links ]

    14. United States Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. Best practices for biospecimen resources. Available from Accessed 1 March 2011. [ Links ]

    15. Sandusky GE, Teheny KH, Esterman M, Hanson J, Williams SD. Quality control of human tissues-experience from the Indiana University Cancer Center-Lilly Research Labs human tissue bank. Cell Tissue Bank. 2007;8(4):287-95. [ Links ]

    16. McNelly E, Cambon-Thomsen A. Twenty-five recommendations on the ethical, legal, and social implications of genetic testing. Available from Accessed 1 March 2011. [ Links ]

    17. Ericsson C, Franzén B, Nistér M. Frozen tissue biobanks. Tissue handling, cryopreservation, extraction, and use for proteomic analysis. Acta Oncol. 2006;45: 643-61. [ Links ]

    18. Pawlikowski J, Sak J, Marczewski K. The analysis of the ethical, organizational and legal aspects of Polish biobanks activity. Eur J Public Health. 2010; 20:707-10. [ Links ]

    19. Truyers C, Kellen E, Arbyn M, Trommelmans L, Nys H, Hensen K, et al. The use of human tissue in epidemiological research; ethical and legal considerations in two biobanks in Belgium. Med Health Care Philos. 2010; 13(2):169-75. [ Links ]

    20. Hawkins AK. Biobanks: importance, implications and opportunities for genetic counselors. J Genet Couns. 2010;19(5): 423-9. [ Links ]

    21. Riegman PH, van Veen EB. Biobanking residual tissues. Hum Genet. 2011; 130(3):357-68. [ Links ]

    22. Gibbons SMC. Regulating biobanks: a twelve-point typological tool. Med Law Rev. 2009; 17: 313-46. [ Links ]

    23. Watson PH, Barnes RO. A proposed schema for classifying human research biobanks. Biopreserv Biobank. 2011;9(4): 327-33. [ Links ]

    24. Hospital A C Camargo. Fundação Antônio Prudente. Banco de Tumores. Available from Accessed 20 December 2011. [ Links ]

    25. Campos AHJFM, Silva AA, Mota LDC, Olivieri ER, Prescinoti VC, Patrão D, et al. Biopreservation and biobanking. 2012;10(2):168-73. [ Links ]

    26. Ministério da Saúde. Instituto Nacional do Câncer. Banco Nacional de Tumores e DNA. Available from programas/site/home/nobrasil/banco_ nacional_tumores_dna/ Accessed 20 December 2011. [ Links ]

    27. Wendler D. One-time general consent for research on biological samples. BMJ. 2006;332:544-7. [ Links ]

    28. da Rocha AC, Seoane JA. Alternative consent models for biobanks: the new Spanish law on biomedical research. Bioethics. 2008;22(8):440-7. [ Links ]

    29. Kettis-Lindblad A, Ring L, Viberth E, Hansson MG. Perceptions of potential donors in the Swedish public towards information and consent procedures in relation to use of human tissue samples in biobanks: a population-based study. Scand J Public Health. 2007;35(2):148-56. [ Links ]

    30. Johnsson L, Hansson MG, Eriksson S, Helgesson G. Patients' refusal to consent to storage and use of samples in Swedish biobanks: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2008;337:a345. [ Links ]

    31. Lemke AA, Wolf WA, Hebert-Beirne J, Smith ME. Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing. Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(6):368-77. [ Links ]

    32. Hoeyer K. Donors perceptions of consent to and feedback from biobank research: time to acknowledge diversity? Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(6):345-52. [ Links ]

    33. Murphy J, Scott J, Kaufman D, Geller G, LeRoy L, Hudson K. Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research. Am J Bioeth. 2008;8(11):36-43. [ Links ]

    34. Kollek R, Petersen I. Disclosure of individual research results in clinico-genomic trials: challenges, classification and criteria for decision-making. J Med Ethics. 2011;37(5):271-5. [ Links ]

    35. Wolf SM, Lawrenz FP, Nelson CA, Kahn JP, Cho MK, Clayton EW, et al. Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics. 2008;36(2):219-48. [ Links ]

    36. Zawati MH, Rioux A. Biobanks and the return of research results: out with the old and in with the new? J Law Med Ethics. 2011;39(4):614-20. [ Links ]

    37. Beskow LM, Burke W. Offering individual genetic research results: context matters. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(38):38cm20. [ Links ]

    38. American Society for Investigative Pathology, International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories. ISBER best practices for repositories: Collection, storage, retrieval and distribution of biologic material for research. Available from Accessed 5 February 2012. [ Links ]

    39. Ministério da Saúde do Brasil. Estudo Longitudinal de Saúde do Adulto. Available from Accessed 20 December 2011. [ Links ]

    40. Ohm P. Broken promises of privacy: responding to the surprising failure of anonymization. UCLA Law Review. Available from Accessed 20 December 2011. [ Links ]

    41. Sterckx S, Van Assche K. The new Belgian law on biobanks: some comments from an ethical perspective. Health Care Anal. 2011;19(3):247-58. [ Links ]