SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Article References

GALERA LLORCA, Jordi; LAHOZ GRILLO, Raquel  and  ROIG LOSCERTALES, Francesc. Comunicación de los resultados de la investigación observacional: análisis mediante la guía Strobe. Rev. Esp. Salud Publica [online]. 2011, vol.85, n.6, pp. 583-591. ISSN 1135-5727.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1135-57272011000600007.

    1. Altman DJ, Moher D. Elaboracin de directrices para la publicacin de investigacin biomdica: proceso y fundamento crtico. Med Clin (Barc). 2005;125(Suppl 1):8-13. [ Links ]

    2. Ribera JM, Cardellach F, Selva A. Procesos de revisin y de edicin de Medicina Clnica. Med Clin (Barc). 2005;125(Suppl 1):3-7. [ Links ]

    3. Altman DG, Schultz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D et al. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann intern Med. 2001;134:663-94. [ Links ]

    4. Pocock SJ, Collier TJ, Dandreo KJ, De Stavola BL, Goldman MB, Kalish LAT et al. Issues in the reporting of epidemiological studies: a survey of recent practice. BMJ. 2004; 329:883. [ Links ]

    5. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwing LM, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem. 2003;49:7-18. [ Links ]

    6. Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N, and the TREND Group. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:361-6. [ Links ]

    7. MoherD, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUORUM statement. Lancet. 199;354:1896-90. [ Links ]

    8. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, GØtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP et al. Declaracin de la Iniciativa STROBE (Stenthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology): directrices para la comunicacin de estudios observacionales. Gac Sanit 2008; 22(2):144-50. [ Links ]

    9. Vandenbroucke JP, Von Elm E, Altman DG, GØtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Gac Sanit 2009; 23(2):158. [ Links ]

    10. Garca del Pozo J, De Abajo FJ. Estudios postautorizacin en Espaa. Situacin normativa. Boletn ICB Digital 2004; 24:1-13 [citado 7 de diciembre 2010]. http://www.icbdigital.org/icbdigital/pdf/articulo/articulo24.pdf [ Links ]

    11. Agencia Espaola del Medicamento. Circular 15/2002, de 10 de octubre. Procedimientos de comunicacin en material de Farmacovigilancia de medicamentos de uso humano entre la Industria Farmacutica y el Sistema Espaol de Farmacovigilancia de medicamentos de uso humano. [ Links ]

    12. Garca del Pozo J Bernard C, Molina Figueras X. Estudios postautorizacin en Espaa: marco legal, problemtica y posibles soluciones. Med Clin (Barc) 2009; 133(17):676-81. [ Links ]

    13. Lagan S, Schimitt J, Coenraads PJ, Svensson A, von Elm E y Williams H. The reporting of observational research studies in dermatology journals: a literature-based study. Arch Dermatol 2010; 146(5):534-41. [ Links ]

    14. Papathanasiou AA, Zintzaras E. Assessing the quality of reporting of observational studies in cancer. Ann Epidemiol 2010; 20(1):67-73. [ Links ]

    15. Groenwold RH, Van Deursen AM, Hoes AW, Hak E. Poor quality of reporting confounding bias in observational intervention studies: a systematic review. Ann Epidemiol 2008; 18(10):746-51. [ Links ]

    16. Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L. CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials). Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: A comparative before-and-after evaluation. JAMA 2001; 285:1992-5. [ Links ]

    17. Wen J, Ren Y, Wang L, Li Y, Liu Y, Zhou M et al. The reporting quality of meta- analyses improves: a random sampling study. J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61(8):770-5. [ Links ]

    18. Gmez Sez N, Hernndez-Aguado I, Lumbreras B. Estudio observacional: evaluacin de la calidad metodolgica de la investigacin diagnstica en Espaa tras la publicacin de la gua STARD. Med Clin (Barc) 2009; 133(8):302-10. [ Links ]

    19. Erb HN. Changing expectations: do journals drive methodological changes? Should they?. Prev Vet Med 2010; 97(3-4):165-74. [ Links ]

    20. Plint AC, Moher D, Morrison A, Schulz K, Altman DG, Hill C et al. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust 2006; 185(5):263-7. [ Links ]