SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Article References

GUARDIOLA-WANDEN-BERGHE, Rocío; SANZ-VALERO, Javier  and  WANDEN-BERGHE, Carmina. Quality assessment of the Website for Eating Disorders: a systematic review of a pending challenge. Ciênc. saúde coletiva [online]. 2012, vol.17, n.9, pp.2489-2497. ISSN 1678-4561.

    1. Murphy R, Frost S, Webster P, Schmidt U. An evaluation of web-based information. Int J Eat Disord 2004; 35(2):145-154. [ Links ]

    2. Mollyann B, Flournoy RE, Altman DE, Blendon RJ, Benson JM, Rosenbaum MD. Health information, The Internet, and the Digital Divide. Health Aff (Millwood) 2000; 19(6):255-265. [ Links ]

    3. Mathur S, Shanti N, Brkaric M, Sood V, Kubeck J, Paulino C, Merola AA. Surfing for Scoliosis: The quality of information available on the Internet. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30(23):2695-2700. [ Links ]

    4. Bernstam EV, Shelton DM, Walji M, Meric-Benrstam F. Instruments to assess the quality of health information on the World Wide Web: What can our patients actually use? J Med Internet Res 2005; 74(1): 13-19. [ Links ]

    5. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Eun-Ryoung S. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web: a systematic review. JAMA 2002; 287(20):2691-2700. [ Links ]

    6. Bardone-Cone AM, Cass KM. What does viewing a pro-Anorexia Website do? An experimental examination of Website exposure and moderating effects. Int J Eat Disord 2007; 40(6):537-548. [ Links ]

    7. Walsh T, Garfinkel P, Halmo KA, Mitchell J, Wilson GT. Eating disorders. In: American Psyciatric Association (APA). DSM-IV-TR Manual diagnóstico y estadístico de los trastornos mentales. Washington DC: APA; 2001. [ Links ]

    8. Norris ML, Boydell KM, Pinhas L, Katzman DK. Ana and the Internet: A review of pro-anorexia Websites. Int J Eat Disord 2006; 39(6):443-447. [ Links ]

    9. Eichhorn KC. Soliciting and providing social support over the Internet: An Investigation of online Eating Disorder support groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2008; 14(1):67-78. [ Links ]

    10. Brotsky SR, Giles D. Inside the "pro-ana" community: A covert online participant observation. Eat Disord 2007; 15(2):93-109. [ Links ]

    11. Mulveen R, Hepworth J. An interpretative phenomenological analysis of participation in a pro-Anorexia Internet site and its relationship with disordered eating. J Health Psychol 2006; 11(2):283-296. [ Links ]

    12. Winzelberg A. The analysis of an electronic support group for individuals with Eating Disorders. Comput Human Behav 1997; 13(3):393-407. [ Links ]

    13. Wesemann D, Grunwald M. Online discussion groups for Bulimia Nervosa: an inductive approach to Internet-based communication between patients. Int J Eat Disord 2008; 41(6):527-534. [ Links ]

    14. Csipke E, Horne O. Pro-eating disorder Websites: users' opinions. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2007; 15(3):196-206. [ Links ]

    15. Gavin J, Rodham K, Poyer H. The presentation of "pro-Anorexia" in online group interactions. Qual Health Res 2008; 18(3):325-333. [ Links ]

    16. Culebras-Fernández J, García de Lorenzo A, Wanden-Berghe C, David Castiel L, Sanz-Valero J. Careful! Your bibliographic references may be examined. Nutr Hosp 2008; 23(2):85-88. [ Links ]

    17. Guardiola Wanden-Berghe R, Sanz-Valero J, Wanden-Berghe C. Eating Disorders Blogs: Testing the Quality of Information on the Internet. Eating Disorders 2010; 18(2):148-152. [ Links ]

    18. Jiménez Pernett J, García Gutiérrez JF, Bermúdez Tamayo C, Silva Castro MM, Tuneu Valls L. Assessment of Websites with information on medicines. Aten Primaria 2009; 41(7):360-366. [ Links ]

    19. Ayuso García MD, Martínez Navarro V. Evaluation of sources and quality of digital resources. An Doc 2006; 9:17-42. [ Links ]

    20. González López I. Assessment: strategies to improve the quality in communication processes. Comunicar - Rev Cient Comun Educ 2006; 27:199-203. [ Links ]

    21. Salvador Oliván JA, Angós Ullate JM. To evaluate the quality of Web resources or just filter? Doc Cienc Inf 2001; 24:105-126. [ Links ]

    22. Breckons M, Jones R, Morris J, Richardson J. What do evaluation instruments tell us about the quality of complementary medicine information on the Internet?. J Med Internet Res 2008; 10(1):e3. [ Links ]

    23. Zeng X, Parmanto B. Evaluation of web accessibility of consumer health information websites. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 743-747. [ Links ]

    24. Commission of the European Communities. eEurope 2002: Quality criteria for health related Websites. J Med Internet Res 2002; 4(3):e15. [ Links ]

    25. Rice RE. Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: multivariate results from the Pew surveys. Int J Med Inform 2006; 75(1):8-28. [ Links ]

    26. Hansen DL, Derry HA, Resnick PJ, Richardson CR. Adolescents searching for health information on the Internet: an observational study. J Med Internet Res 2003; 5(4):e25. [ Links ]