SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

Article References

CARRILLO-LARCO, Rodrigo M.; PEREZ-LU, José E.; ALVARADO-VASQUEZ, Eduardo  and  CURIOSO, Walter H.. Evaluación de la calidad de información sobre el embarazo en páginas web según las guías peruanas. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica [online]. 2012, vol.29, n.1, pp. 76-81. ISSN 1726-4634.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1726-46342012000100011.

    1. Rahnavardi M, Arabi MS, Ardalan G, Zamani N, Jahanbin M, Sohani F, et al. Accuracy and coverage of reproductive health information on the Internet accessed in English and Persian from Iran. J Fam Plan Reprod Health Care. 2008,34(3):153-7. [ Links ]

    2. Hardwick JC, MacKenzie FM. Information contained in miscarriage- related websites and the predictive value of website scoring systems. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;106(1):60-3. [ Links ]

    3. Latthe PM, Latthe M, Khan KS. Quality of information on female sterilisation on the Internet. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;20(2):167-70. [ Links ]

    4. Leung L. Internet Embeddedness: Links with Online Health Information Seeking, Expectancy Value/Quality of Health Information Websites, and Internet Usage Patterns. Cyber- Psychology & Behavior. 2008;11(5):565-9. [ Links ]

    5. Ilic D. The role of the internet on patient knowledge management, education, and decision-making. Telemed J E Health. 2010;16(6):664-9. [ Links ]

    6. Beaton C, Codd RJ, Holland PA, Gateley CA. Evaluation of the quality and accuracy of information regarding aromatase inhibitors available on the Internet. Breast J. 2008;14(4):366-8. [ Links ]

    7. Tozzi AE, Buonuomo PS, Ciofi degli Atti ML, Carloni E, Meloni M, Gamba F. Comparison of quality of internet pages on human papilomavirus immunization in Italian and in English. J Adolesc Health. 2010;46(1):83-9. [ Links ]

    8. Dyer KA. Ethical challenges of medicine and health on the Internet: a review. J Med Internet Res. 2001;3(2):e23. [ Links ]

    9. Wilson P. How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet. BMJ. 2002;324(7337):598-602. [ Links ]

    10. Eysenbach G. Towards ethical guidelines for e-health: JMIR theme issue on eHealth ethics. J Med Internet Res. 2000;2(1):e7. [ Links ]

    11. Biermann JS, Golladay GJ, Greenfield ML, Baker LH. Evaluation of Cancer Information on the Internet. Cancer. 1999;86(3):381-90. [ Links ]

    12. Kunst H, Groot D, Latthe PM, Latthe M, Khan KS. Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: survey of five common health topics. BMJ. 2002;324(7337):581-2. [ Links ]

    13. Stinson JN, Tucker L, Huber A, Harris H, Lin C, Cohen L, et al. Surfing for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: perspectives o quality and content of information on the Internet. J Rheumatol. 2009;36(8):1755-62. [ Links ]

    14. Thompson AE, Graydon SL. Patient-oriented methotrexate information sites on the Internet: a review of completeness, accuracy, format, reliability, credibility, and readability. J Rheumatol. 2009;36(1):41-9. [ Links ]

    15. Jadad AR, Gagliardi A. Rating Health Information on the Internet. JAMA. 1998;279. [ Links ]

    16. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;287(20):2691-700. [ Links ]

    17. Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, Algazy JI, Kravitz RL, Broder MS, et al. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA. 2001;285(20):2612-21. [ Links ]

    18. Rancao Garca I, Rodrigo Pends JA, Villa Estbanez R, Abdelsater Fayad M, Daz Prez R, Alvarez Garca D. Evaluacin de las pginas web en lengua espaola tiles para el mdico de atencin primaria. Aten Primaria. 2003;31(9):575-80. [ Links ]

    19. Instituto Nacional de Estadstica e Informtica. La Tecnologas de la Informacin y Comunicacin en los Hogares. Lima, Per: INEI; 2010. [ Links ]

    20. Curioso WH, Blas MM, Nodell B, Alva IE, Kurth AE. Opportunities for providing web-based interventions to prevent sexually transmitted infections in Peru. PLoS Med. 2007;4(2):e11. [ Links ]

    23. Curr V, Buonuomo PS, Onesimo R, de Rose P, Vituzzi A, di Tanna GL, et al. A quality evaluation methodology of health web-sites for non-professionals. Med Inform Internet Med. 2004;29(2):95-107. [ Links ]

    24. Ministerio de Salud. Guas Nacionales de Atencin Integral de la Salud Sexual y Reproductiva. Lima, Per: MINSA; 2004. [ Links ]

    25. Conesa Fuentes Mdel C, Aguinaga Ontoso E, Hernndez Morante JJ. An evaluation of the quality of health web pages using a validated questionnaire. Aten Primaria. 2011;43(1):33-40. [ Links ]

    26. Coquard O, Fernandez S, Khazaal Y. Assessing the quality of French language web sites peraining to alcohol dependency. Sante Ment Que. 2008;33(2):207-24. [ Links ]

    27. Mathur S, Shanti N, Brkaric M, Sood V, Kubeck J, Paulino C, et al. Surfing for scoliosis: the quality of information available on the Internet. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(23):2695-700. [ Links ]

    28. Weiss E, Moore K. An Assessment of the Quality of Information Available on the Internet about the IUD and the Potential Impact on Contraceptive Choices. Contraception. 2003;68(5):359-64. [ Links ]

    29. Curioso W, Castillo C, Soto A, Iglesias Q, Echevarria Z, Gotuzzo H. Cerrando la brecha digital en el Per: Educando a personas viviendo con VIH/SIDA a evaluar la calidad de la informacin en salud en la Internet. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2007;24(3):280-5. [ Links ]