A comparative analysis of national HIV policies in six African countries with generalized epidemics

Analyse comparative des politiques nationales de lutte contre le VIH dans six pays africains où l'épidémie est généralisée

Un análisis comparativo de las políticas nacionales sobre el VIH en seis países africanos con epidemias generalizadas

تحليل مقارن للسياسات الوطنية مكافحة فيروس العوز المناعي البشري في ستة بلدان أفريقية تعاني من أوبئة معممة

在艾滋病病毒广泛流行的六个非洲国家中开展关于国家艾滋病病毒政策的对比分析

Сравнительный анализ государственной политики в отношении ВИЧ в шести странах Африки с генерализованной эпидемией

Kathryn Church Francis Kiweewa Aisha Dasgupta Mary Mwangome Edith Mpandaguta Francesc Xavier Gómez-Olivé Samuel Oti Jim Todd Alison Wringe Eveline Geubbels Amelia Crampin Jessica Nakiyingi-Miiro Chika Hayashi Muthoni Njage Ryan G Wagner Alex Riolexus Ario Simon D Makombe Owen Mugurungi Basia Zaba About the authors

Abstract

Objective:

To compare national human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) policies influencing access to HIV testing and treatment services in six sub-Saharan African countries.

Methods:

We reviewed HIV policies as part of a multi-country study on adult mortality in sub-Saharan Africa. A policy extraction tool was developed and used to review national HIV policy documents and guidelines published in Kenya, Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, the United Republic of Tanzania and Zimbabwe between 2003 and 2013. Key informant interviews helped to fill gaps in findings. National policies were categorized according to whether they explicitly or implicitly adhered to 54 policy indicators, identified through literature and expert reviews. We also compared the national policies with World Health Organization (WHO) guidance.

Findings:

There was wide variation in policies between countries; each country was progressive in some areas and not in others. Malawi was particularly advanced in promoting rapid initiation of antiretroviral therapy. However, no country had a consistently enabling policy context expected to increase access to care and prevent attrition. Countries went beyond WHO guidance in certain areas and key informants reported that practice often surpassed policy.

Conclusion:

Evaluating the impact of policy differences on access to care and health outcomes among people living with HIV is challenging. Certain policies will exert more influence than others and official policies are not always implemented. Future research should assess the extent of policy implementation and link these findings with HIV outcomes.

Résumé

Objectif

Comparer les politiques nationales de lutte contre le virus de l'immunodéficience humaine (VIH) qui influencent l'accès aux services de dépistage et de traitement du VIH dans six pays d'Afrique subsaharienne.

Méthodes

Nous avons examiné les politiques de lutte contre le VIH dans le cadre d'une étude multi-pays sur la mortalité des adultes en Afrique subsaharienne. Un outil d'extraction de données a été mis au point et utilisé afin d'examiner les documents et les directives des politiques nationales de lutte contre le VIH publiés en Afrique du Sud, au Kenya, au Malawi, en Ouganda, en République-Unie de Tanzanie et au Zimbabwe entre 2003 et 2013. Des entretiens avec des informateurs clés ont permis de combler les carences de ces résultats. Les politiques nationales ont été classées suivant leur degré de correspondance, explicite ou implicite, avec 54 indicateurs relatifs aux politiques, déterminés d'après des analyses documentaires et des examens d'experts. Nous avons également comparé les politiques nationales avec les recommandations de l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé (OMS).

Résultats

Nous avons observé de grandes différences entre les politiques de ces pays ; chaque pays était avancé dans certains domaines et pas dans d'autres. Le Malawi l'était particulièrement en matière de promotion du démarrage rapide du traitement antirétroviral. Cependant, aucun pays n'avait un contexte politique pouvant systématiquement permettre d'augmenter l'accès aux soins et d'éviter l'arrêt du traitement. Dans certains domaines, les pays allaient plus loin que les recommandations de l'OMS et les informateurs ont indiqué que la pratique dépassait souvent le cadre des politiques.

Conclusion

Évaluer l'impact des différentes politiques sur l'accès aux soins et les résultats en termes de santé des personnes qui vivent avec le VIH n'est pas chose simple. Certaines politiques exercent une influence plus forte que d'autres et les politiques officielles ne sont pas toujours mises en œuvre. Des recherches ultérieures devraient évaluer le degré de mise en œuvre des politiques et mettre en lien leurs conclusions avec les résultats de la lutte contre le VIH.

Resumen

Objetivo: Comparar las políticas nacionales relativas al virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana (VIH) que influencian el acceso a las pruebas del VIH y a los tratamientos en seis países sub-saharianos.

Métodos:

Se revisaron las políticas relativas al VIH como parte de un estudio multinacional sobre la mortalidad de adultos en África Subsahariana. Se desarrolló una herramienta de extracción de políticas y se utilizó para revisar los documentos y guías de las políticas nacionales relativas al VIH publicadas en Kenia, Malawi, República Unida de Tanzania, Sudáfrica, Uganda y Zimbabue entre 2003 y 2013. Se hicieron entrevistas a informantes claves que ayudaron a llenar los vacíos en los resultados. Las políticas nacionales se clasificaron según si se adhirieron explícita o implícitamente a 54 indicadores de políticas, identificados mediante bibliografía y opiniones de expertos. Asimismo, se compararon las políticas nacionales con las directrices de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS).

Resultados:

Se descubrió que había una amplia variedad entre las políticas de los países. Cada país estaba más avanzado en algunas áreas que en otras. Malawi estaba especialmente avanzado en la promoción de empezar rápidamente la terapia antirretroviral. Sin embargo, ningún país tenía un contexto de introducción de políticas consistente que incrementara el acceso a la atención primaria y evitara la deserción. Algunos países iban más allá de las orientaciones de la OMS en algunas áreas e informantes clave informaron de que la práctica a menudo superaba la política.

Conclusión:

Evaluar el impacto de las diferencias en las políticas relativas en el acceso a la atención primaria y los resultados en la salud entre aquellas personas con VIH es un reto. Algunas políticas ejercerán más influencia que otras y las políticas oficiales no siempre se aplican. Las investigaciones futuras deberían evaluar el grado de aplicación de las políticas y vincular estos resultados con los resultados del VIH.

ملخص

الغرض:

مقارنة السياسات الوطنية لمكافحة فيروس العوز المناعي البشري(HIV) والتي تؤثر على القدرة على الاستفادة من خدمات الاختبار والعلاج من فيروس العوز المناعي البشري في ستة بلدان أفريقية واقعة جنوبي الصحراء.

الطريقة:

لقد راجعنا سياسات مكافحة فيروس العوز المناعي البشري كجزء من دراسة شملت العديد من البلدان حول معدلات وفيات البالغين في البلدان الأفريقية الواقعة جنوبي الصحراء. تم إعداد واستخدام أداة استخلاص السياسة لمراجعة الوثائق والمبادئ التوجيهية لسياسة مكافحة فيروس العوز المناعي البشري الوطنية التي نشرت في كينيا وملاوي وجنوب أفريقيا وأوغندا وجمهورية تنزانيا المتحدة وزمبابوي في الفترة ما بين عام 2003 و2013. ولقد ساعدت مقابلات المبلّغين الرئيسين على سد الثغرات في النتائج. صُنِّفت السياسات الوطنية وفقًا لما إذا كانت التزمت صراحةً أو ضمنيًا بـ 54 من مؤشرات السياسة، التي تم تحديدها من خلال المؤلفات الطبية ومراجعات الخبراء. وقمنا أيضًا بمقارنة السياسات الوطنية مع توجيهات منظمة الصحة العالمية (WHO).

النتائج:

كان هناك تفاوت كبير في السياسات بين البلدان؛ حيث تميز كل بلد بالتقدم في بعض الجوانب دون غيرها. كانت ملاوي متقدمة على وجه الخصوص في تعزيز فكرة الإسراع في بدء العلاج باستخدام مضادات الفيروسات القهقرية. ومع ذلك، لم يكن لدى أي بلد سياق لتطبيق سياسة تتيح تطوير القدرات بصورة ثابتة، بحيث يُنتظر منه تيسير سبل الاستفادة من الرعاية والحد من الاستنزاف. قامت البلدان بتجاوز توجيهات منظمة الصحة العالمية في مناطق معينة وذكر المبلّغون الرئيسون أن الممارسة غالبًا ما كانت تتجاوز السياسة.

الاستنتاج:

من العسير تقييم تأثير اختلافات السياسة في فرص الحصول على الرعاية والنتائج الصحية بين الأشخاص المصابين بفيروس العوز المناعي البشري. فسوف تحقق بعض السياسات المعينة المزيد من التأثير دون سواها، كما لا يتم دائمًا تنفيذ السياسات الرسمية. ينبغي على الأبحاث المستقبلية تقييم مدى تنفيذ السياسات وربط هذه النتائج بحصائل الإصابة بفيروس العوز المناعي البشري.


摘要

目的:

旨在对比在撒哈拉沙漠以南的六个非洲国家中能够影响艾滋病病毒测试和治疗服务的国家艾滋病病毒 (HIV) 政策。

方法:

在撒哈拉沙漠以南的非洲国家中进行有关成人死亡率的多国研究期间,我们评审了艾滋病病毒政策。 当时开发了一种政策提取工具并将其用于评审津巴布韦、肯尼亚、马拉维、南非、坦桑尼亚联合共和国以及乌干达在 2003 年和 2013 年期间出版的国家艾滋病病毒政策文件和指南。关键知情人访谈帮助我们弥补了调查结果中的不足之处。 我们依据国家政策是否以明确或隐含的方式遵循 54 项政策指标来对其进行分类,并且通过文献和专家评审加以确认。 同时,我们还对比了国家政策和世界卫生组织 (WHO) 指南。

结果:

各国的政策差异很大;每个国家都在一些方面达到先进水平,而在另一些方面却没有达到先进水平。 马拉维在推动抗逆转录病毒疗法的快速启动方面尤为先进。 然而,没有一个国家能够终保持一贯有利的政策环境,难以按预期提高护理普及率和预防消耗。 各国在某些方面超出了世界卫生组织指南的范围,并且据关键知情人报告,实际情况往往超越政策范围。

结论:

评估政策差异对艾滋病病毒患者的护理普及率和医疗效果的影响具有挑战性。 某些政策会比其他政策产生更大的影响,并且官方政策并不总是能够得到落实。 今后的研究应评估政策实施的程度,并将这些调查结果与艾滋病病毒的医疗效果联系起来。

Резюме

Цель.

Сравнить политику в отношении вируса иммунодефицита человека (ВИЧ) в шести странах Африки к югу от Сахары. Оценивается доступность анализа на ВИЧ и услуг по лечению.

Методы.

Политики в отношении ВИЧ были рассмотрены в рамках многонационального исследования смертности взрослого населения в странах Африки к югу от Сахары. Для анализа политик был разработан специальный инструмент, который использовался для проверки официальных документов и рекомендаций, связанных с государственной политикой в отношении ВИЧ, опубликованных в Кении, Малави, Южной Африке, Уганде, Объединенной Республике Танзания и Зимбабве в период между 2003 и 2013 гг. Неясные моменты уточнялись благодаря ключевым информаторам. Национальные политики распределялись по категориям в зависимости от того, придерживались ли они явным или косвенным образом 54 показателей, выявленных в ходе оценки публикаций и отчетов специалистов. Было также проведено сравнение национальных политик с рекомендациями Всемирной организации здравоохранения (ВОЗ).

Результаты.

Политики в разных странах отличались друг от друга; в каждой из стран отмечался прогресс в одних областях и отставание в других. В частности, Малави значительно выделялась продвижением раннего начала антиретровирусной терапии. Тем не менее ни в одной стране не была реализована эффективная политика, которая облегчала бы доступ к медицинской помощи и препятствовала бы оттоку персонала. В некоторых областях страны пошли дальше рекомендаций ВОЗ и основные информаторы сообщили, что практика часто опережала политику.

Вывод.

Оценить, насколько отличия в государственной политике влияют на доступ к лечению и результаты мероприятий по охране здоровья для лиц, живущих с ВИЧ, довольно сложно. Некоторые из политик имеют сравнительно больший эффект, и официальная политика не всегда выполняется. В будущих исследованиях необходимо оценить степень выполнения политик и связать полученные данные с результатами лечения ВИЧ.

Introduction

By the end of 2012, more than 7.5 million of the estimated 23.5 million people living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in Africa were receiving treatment, compared to only 50 000 people a decade before.11.  Global update on HIV treatment 2013: results, impact and opportunities. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. The scale-up of treatment services in such a short period of time has been remarkable. Recent evidence suggests that HIV-attributable mortality has declined by more than 50% since antiretroviral therapy (ART) became available.22.  Bor J, Herbst AJ, Newell ML, Bärnighausen T. Increases in adult life expectancy in rural South Africa: valuing the scale-up of HIV treatment. Science. 2013 Feb 22;339(6122):961-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1230413PMID:23430655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.123041...
88.  Slaymaker E, Todd J, Marston M, Calvert C, Michael D, Nakiyingi-Miiro J, et al. How have ART treatment programmes changed the patterns of excess mortality in people living with HIV? Estimates from four countries in East and Southern Africa. Glob Health Action. 2014;7(0):22789. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.22789PMID:24762982
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.22789...

Nonetheless, considerable concerns remain regarding high attrition rates throughout the continuum of care from HIV diagnosis, pre-ART care, timely initiation of ART and long-term retention in treatment.99.  UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic 2013. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; 2013. Various studies have observed substantial drop-out of people living with HIV across this care cascade. A recent pooled analysis of 37 studies in sub-Saharan Africa indicates that among those knowing their status, only 57% completed ART eligibility assessment, 66% of those eligible initiated ART and 65% of those initiating treatment were retained on ART.1010.  Kranzer K, Govindasamy D, Ford N, Johnston V, Lawn SD. Quantifying and addressing losses along the continuum of care for people living with HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. J Int AIDS Soc. 2012;15(2):17383. http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.15.2.17383PMID:23199799
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.15.2.17383...

The network for analysing longitudinal population-based data on HIV in Africa (ALPHA) is investigating the extent of declines in HIV-related adult mortality attributable to treatment and the distribution of deaths at each stage of the diagnosis-to-treatment cascade.1111.  Glynn JR, Calvert C, Price A, Chihana M, Kachiwanda L, Mboma S, et al. Measuring causes of adult mortality in rural northern Malawi over a decade of change. Glob Health Action. 2014;7(0):23621. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.23621PMID:24802384
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.23621...
1414.  Masiira B, Baisley K, Mayanja BN, Kazooba P, Maher D, Kaleebu P. Mortality and its predictors among antiretroviral therapy naïve HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell count 350 cells/mm(3) compared to the general population: data from a population-based prospective HIV cohort in Uganda.. Glob Health Action 2014;7(0):21843. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.21843PMID:24433941
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.21843...
The network collects community-based data from 10 health and demographic surveillance sites in six countries with generalized epidemics - Kenya, Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, the United Republic of Tanzania and Zimbabwe. Table 1 identifies the ALPHA network sites and provides contextual information on the epidemic and treatment programme in each country.

Table 1
Characteristics of the HIV epidemic in the six African countries99.  UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic 2013. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; 2013. 1515.  The gap report.; Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS 2014. 2424.  Global update on the health sector response to HIV, 2014.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2014.

To interpret site- and country-specific differences in mortality rates across the diagnosis-to-treatment cascade, we analysed national HIV policies. It is helpful for the agencies that define programme priorities and analyse differences in outcomes to understand the incentives and barriers to accessing - and remaining on - ART in different contexts. Our analysis focuses on the policy response to the HIV epidemic. We have not investigated the sociocultural barriers within communities that influence access to services in different sites.

Methods

A conceptual framework was developed, identifying key HIV policy and programmatic factors that may influence HIV-related adult mortality (Fig. 1). These factors were derived from a review of the literature (including a recent systematic review on health sector interventions to ensure a continuum of care),1010.  Kranzer K, Govindasamy D, Ford N, Johnston V, Lawn SD. Quantifying and addressing losses along the continuum of care for people living with HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. J Int AIDS Soc. 2012;15(2):17383. http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.15.2.17383PMID:23199799
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.15.2.17383...
an initial review of World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines and expert review of indicators by 28 HIV researchers and clinicians. Through the literature review and preliminary analysis of ALPHA network mortality data, we identified three attrition points to inform the structure of our policy review: (i) access to HIV testing and counselling; (ii) access to HIV care and treatment (including assessment of eligibility for treatment initiation and initiation itself); and (iii) retention on ART. Across these three attrition points (diagnosis, HIV care and retention), relevant factors fell into the following five areas: (i) service access and coverage; (ii) quality of care; (iii) coordination of care and patient tracking; (iv) medical management; and (v) support to people living with HIV.

Fig. 1
Conceptual framework of HIV policy and service factors influencing HIV-related adult mortality

A policy extraction tool was developed to facilitate the indicator review (available from the author). Documents were searched online through ministry of health and national HIV organization websites and/or retrieved in person from official offices and libraries, using the following inclusion criteria: (i) nationally relevant (not clinic- or district-specific); (ii) containing programmatic or clinical guidance on one of the three key adult HIV services: HIV testing and counselling, prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) or HIV care and treatment; (iii) published between January 2003 and June 2013. Documents likely to fit these three criteria were considered, including policy statements, clinical guidelines, training manuals, strategies, indicator guides and parliamentary acts. Guideline documents produced by WHO relevant to criteria (ii) and (iii) were also included.

The policy extraction tool was used to collect information on policy content, source, year and policy changes over time. Country teams completed gaps in data collection using unstructured informal interviews with key informants. Informants were either regional or national policy-makers, researchers or clinicians involved in policy development.

We summarized key policies judged most likely to affect access to HIV testing, access to HIV care and treatment and retention on ART. For each indicator, each country's policy was categorized into one of the following: (i) has explicit policy; (ii) has implicit policy or policy has caveats or exceptions; (iii) is unclear whether policy exists or policy conflicts with other policies; or (iv) does not have policy. We also assessed whether the policy was consistent with WHO guidance or a country standard that went beyond such guidance.

Results

A total of 120 policy documents with guidance relevant to the indicators were identified and reviewed; references are available from the author.

Access to testing

Fig. 2 summarizes policies influencing access to HIV testing. Policies in the six countries were generally consistent and explicitly or partially adhered to the policy indicators, including provision of free testing services and provider-initiated testing and counselling. Malawi was the only country with no policy targeting testing among high-risk groups; while Uganda and the United Republic of Tanzania did not define the high-risk groups. Only South Africa and Uganda had explicit policies enabling minors to access testing without parental consent.

Fig. 2
WHO guidance and policies in six African countries influencing access to HIV testing, 2003 to mid-2013 2525.  A public health approach for scaling up antiretroviral treatment: a toolkit for program managers.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2003. 5656.  National antiretroviral treatment and care guidelines for adults and children. 1st ed.; Kampala: Uganda Ministry of Health 2003.

Indicators related to quality of care were more variable. Anonymous HIV testing was guaranteed only in South Africa and Zimbabwe, whereas in Kenya, Uganda and the United Republic of Tanzania names could be recorded in registers to facilitate patient management. Various WHO documents emphasized confidentiality and protection from discrimination, but did not offer explicit guidance on maintaining anonymity. Only Kenya and the United Republic of Tanzania had policies limiting the number of testing sessions that counsellors can perform per day. While all countries stipulated the need for periodic refresher training for counsellors and quality control checks at sites, they varied in stated frequency, with the United Republic of Tanzania and Zimbabwe most explicit about how often retraining is required.

Policies influencing coordination of care and patient tracking were more ambiguous in the United Republic of Tanzania where there was no clear policy on repeat testing intervals for negatives or on repeat testing during pregnancy, labour or after delivery. Malawi was also ambiguous in this area, with repeat testing for negatives advised every 6-12 months for high-risk individuals and no explicit policy on repeat testing during pregnancy.

Regarding patient support, Malawi, South Africa and Uganda also stipulated that pretest HIV counselling be conducted either individually or in groups; others recommended at least one individual session. While all countries promoted couple counselling, this was not explicit in WHO guidance.

Access to care and treatment

Fig. 3 summarizes policies influencing access to care and treatment services, which varied more across countries. Free public sector access to PMTCT and ART was guaranteed everywhere, either explicitly in HIV policies or national health policies or implied in the national constitution, although WHO documents only implied free public sector access through promotion of universal access to HIV services. All countries promoted PMTCT availability within antenatal care and all allowed task-shifting of ART initiation to clinical officers, medical assistants or nurses (albeit with important variations in year of policy formulation, with Kenya, Malawi and the United Republic of Tanzania allowing task shifting as early as 2004/2005). Only Malawi and Uganda had explicit policies stating that all sites providing ART should also be able to initiate ART.

Fig. 3
WHO guidance and policies in six African countries influencing access to HIV care and treatment, 2003 to mid-2013 2626.  Presidential declaration. Nairobi, Kenya. Nairobi: Executive Office of the President; 2006. 2929.  Uganda national policy guidelines for HIV counseling and testing. Kampala. Kampala: Uganda Ministry of Health; 2005. 3131.  Review of hospital fees and charges. Harare: Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Welfare; 2007. 3434.  The 5-year plan to scale up HCT services in Malawi 2006-2010.; Lilongwe: Malawi Ministry of Health 2006. 422.  Bor J, Herbst AJ, Newell ML, Bärnighausen T. Increases in adult life expectancy in rural South Africa: valuing the scale-up of HIV treatment. Science. 2013 Feb 22;339(6122):961-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1230413PMID:23430655
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.123041...
4545.  National quality management guidance framework for HIV testing and counseling. Nairobi: Kenya National AIDS and STI Control Programme; 2010. 5252.  Clinical guidelines: PMTCT (Prevention of mother to child transmission).; Pretoria: South Africa Department of Health 2010. 5555.  Scaling-up HIV testing and counselling services: a toolkit for programme managers.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2003. 5757.  Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act; 1996. 8484.  Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2013.

All countries had explicit policies on the need for CD4+ T-lymphocyte (CD4+ cells) testing at least every six months in the pre-ART phase and all recorded pre-ART visits in patient registers or forms. Only Kenya, Uganda and the United Republic of Tanzania had explicit policies on patient follow-up to ensure registration at treatment sites. All countries except Zimbabwe stipulated the need for PMTCT-ART referral, but only South Africa and the United Republic of Tanzania indicated when this referral should occur (six weeks after birth). Service integration between maternal and child health and ART was encouraged explicitly in Kenya, Malawi, Uganda and Zimbabwe.

Most countries adhered to WHO's 2010 Option B regimen for PMTCT (provision of triple drug therapy to the mother during pregnancy until delivery or cessation of breastfeeding), except the United Republic of Tanzania which still adhered to WHO's Option A regimen at the time of the review (single dose drug therapy with zidovudine [AZT] during pregnancy, triple therapy at onset of labour using nevirapine, AZT and lamivudine [3TC], followed by dual drug therapy for seven days postpartum with AZT and 3TC). Malawi was the only country to have explicitly adopted WHO's Option B+ regimen (initiation of life-long triple ART therapy during pregnancy) for all women in 2011, which was earlier than WHO guidance. Roll-out of Option B+ in Kenya and Uganda was dependent on the capacity of the health facility to initiate triple therapy.

Most countries had explicit policies allowing all people co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis to initiate ART, but differed markedly in their year of uptake of this policy, ranging from 2004 in Malawi, to 2013 in South Africa. Country guidance varied on tuberculosis and HIV treatment initiation: Malawi and Uganda stated that co-infected patients must initiate ART on the same day or within two weeks of starting tuberculosis treatment (going beyond WHO guidance of within eight weeks); while Kenya and the United Republic of Tanzania stated that treatment should preferably be initiated within two weeks. While all countries shared the standard ART initiation criteria, only Kenya and Malawi stipulated explicitly that ART should be initiated within seven days of being found eligible for treatment. Malawi and South Africa also had more liberal policies allowing ART initiation with minimum requirements for tests and counselling. Malawi has not required laboratory tests for initiation since the beginning of the treatment programme (2004). South Africa brought in this change in 2013 and stated that adherence counselling should not be compulsory before initiation.

Retention on ART

Fig. 4 summarizes policies influencing retention on ART. Stipulating that ART clinics include a doctor or clinical officer could be a barrier to access in resource-constrained contexts. This requirement is still applied in Kenya, Malawi, the United Republic of Tanzania and Zimbabwe (even though task-shifting for initiation occurred). Quality indicators also varied, with staff retraining and quality control intervals varying or not made explicit; for example no quality control was required after initial accreditation in South Africa, versus quarterly checks in Malawi, Uganda and the United Republic of Tanzania.

Fig. 4
WHO guidance and policies in six African countries influencing retention on ART, 2003-mid-2013 3636.  Uganda HIV counselling and testing policy. Kampala: Uganda Ministry of Health; 2010. 4646.  Patient monitoring guidelines for HIV care and antiretroviral therapy (ART).; Geneva: World Health Organization 2006. 5353.  The integrated national guidelines on antiretroviral therapy, prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV and infant & young child feeding. 1st ed.; Kampala: Uganda Ministry of Health 2011. 5656.  National antiretroviral treatment and care guidelines for adults and children. 1st ed.; Kampala: Uganda Ministry of Health 2003. 5858.  Uganda antiretroviral treatment policy. 2nd ed.; Kampala: Uganda Ministry of Health 2011. 6060.  Guidelines for antiretroviral therapy in Kenya.; Nairobi: Kenya National AIDS and STI Control Programme 2011. 6262.  The South Africa antiretroviral treatment guidelines.; Pretoria: South Africa Department of Health 2010. 6767.  National ART guidelines.; Nairobi: Kenya National AIDS and STI Control Programme 2005. 6969.  National guidelines for the clinical management of HIV and AIDS. 2nd ed.; Dar es Salaam: Tanzanian National AIDS Control Program 2005. 7070.  Guidelines for antiretroviral therapy in Zimbabwe.; Harare: Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Welfare 2010. 7373.  Clinical management of HIV in children and adults: Malawi integrated guidelines.; Lilongwe: Malawi Ministry of Health 2011. 7676.  National guidelines for the clinical management of HIV and AIDS. 3rd ed.; Dar es Salaam: Tanzanian National AIDS Control Program 2009. 8181.  Guidelines for the use of ART in Malawi. 1st ed.; Lilongwe: Malawi Ministry of Health 2003. 9696.  Home based care policy guidelines for HIV/AIDS.; Kampala: Uganda Ministry of Health 2009.

There were also important differences in coordination of care and patient tracking. Since the beginning of the treatment programme, Malawi did not promote routine CD4 monitoring, unlike all other countries where yearly or six-monthly monitoring was standard. While most countries advised that stable patients receive a three-month supply of drugs, two months of supplies were stipulated in the United Republic of Tanzania and one month in South Africa. All countries promoted regular pill counts, but only South Africa and Zimbabwe had explicit policies on home visits following signs of poor adherence - others recommended home visits or telephone contact following missed appointments. Only Kenya explicitly recommended daily register reviews to identify missed appointments. Definitions of missed appointments and loss to follow-up varied: Zimbabwe was most reactive with a missed appointment defined as a one-week delay, followed by Malawi where a two-week absence triggered action. Most countries defined loss to follow-up or defaulting as no attendance within 90 days of the last visit, but the number of days was not defined in Malawi and was unclear in South Africa. Malawi, Uganda and the United Republic of Tanzania also allowed drug collection by designees (treatment partners/guardians).

Support to those on ART varied. All countries explicitly or implicitly recommended individual adherence counselling, but Malawi and Uganda did not stipulate referral to peer-support. Kenya and Uganda provided nutritional support to ART patients; Malawi stopped this in adults due to lack of evidence. Only South Africa, the United Republic of Tanzania and Zimbabwe routinely referred all ART patients to home-based care programmes.

All sites recommended routine screening for tuberculosis, but Zimbabwe did not routinely provide isoniazid preventive therapy for tuberculosis prevention. All countries except Zimbabwe recommended at least four first-line ART regimen choices to patients, but not all complied with WHO's 2010 recommended first line standard therapy (tenofovir, 3TC and nevirapine/efavirenz). Zimbabwe was the first to introduce WHO's recommended regimen in 2010. All countries except Malawi had clear criteria for switching to efavirenz-based regimens for patients who develop tuberculosis.

Discussion

Here we demonstrate wide variation in national HIV policies influencing service access and attrition through the diagnosis-to-treatment cascade across six countries with generalized HIV epidemics. Given that African countries usually adopt guidance from WHO, such a degree of policy variation is surprising.

Several indicators were consistent across all countries, but for many indicators, countries were progressive in selected areas and no country stood out as having a consistently enabling policy context that would have a decisive impact on service access and attrition. In Malawi, for example, policies designed to facilitate access to care (such as no requirements for routine CD4 testing, early adoption of the Option B+ PMTCT regimen, rapid ART initiation for those eligible), contrasted with certain policy gaps (such as targeted testing for high-risk groups, repeat testing during labour/after delivery, referral to peer support or home-based care for patients on ART). South Africa is another case where policies aiming to enhance access in some areas contrasted with policy gaps in others. South Africa had policies on anonymous HIV testing, home visits following signs of poor adherence and few barriers to starting ART (no required laboratory tests, adherence counselling, or physician presence in ART clinics), but lacked policies on quality control for ART, provision of three-monthly ART supplies, guidance on missed appointments or loss to follow-up and compliance with WHO first-line regimen standards. In the United Republic of Tanzania, an enabling policy environment for retention of patients in care and treatment contrasted with the slow adoption of WHO Option B+ and ART regimens containing tenofovir (both subsequently adopted in September 2013), as well as weaknesses in repeat testing intervals.

There were also important differences in the timing of policy implementation in some indicators. Malawi adopted Option B+ in 2011 (before WHO guidance) and has not required laboratory tests for ART initiation since 2004 (versus South Africa, which made this change in 2013). Policies to trace missed appointments with home visits or phone contacts vary in dates of implementation from 2004-2005 in Malawi and the United Republic of Tanzania, to 2011 in Kenya. While countries often lagged behind WHO in national policy adoption, in some instances countries went beyond WHO standards; notable examples included policies related to pre-ART-CD4 monitoring intervals, rapid initiation of ART, task-shifting for ART initiation, drug resupply intervals, pill count recommendations, drug collection by designees, referral to peer support and home-based care. The fact that WHO had no explicit guidance on such topics may contribute to the differences in adoption of policies across countries.

Policies are likely to differ in their potential impact on service access and attrition. We are unable to judge, therefore, how policy differences are likely to influence mortality. There seems to be little correlation between policy profile and service coverage (Table 1). Our analysis did not attempt to weight policies - as this is likely to be highly subjective. One might expect that policies on patient coordination and tracking (e.g. pre-ART monitoring, timely initiation of ART and adherence monitoring) have greater impact than policies on quality of care (e.g. staff training or quality audits). The relative emphasis on different policies also varied; some indicators were only mentioned once in one document, while others were core tenets of HIV service delivery and repeatedly mentioned.

We attempted to frame all policies as designed to increase service access and reduce attrition, but the direction of effect was not always clear-cut. For example, anonymous testing may promote access to diagnosis by reducing stigma, but may hamper linkage to care. Group pretest counselling may facilitate test access but have quality implications. Requiring people co-infected with HIV and tuberculosis to stabilize on tuberculosis treatment before initiating ART may be beneficial only for patients with very low CD4 counts.9797.  Chang CC, Crane M, Zhou J, Mina M, Post JJ, Cameron BA, et al. HIV and co-infections. Immunol Rev. 2013 Jul;254(1):114-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imr.12063PMID:23772618
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imr.12063...
Allowing certain sites to provide ART refills may also be advantageous, allowing patients to access drugs nearer home. Fast-tracking patients into care (with rapid ART initiation and no requirements for laboratory tests or adherence counselling) may increase immediate uptake of services, but could undermine long-term adherence if patients are inadequately prepared for treatment. Not insisting on routine CD4 monitoring of ART patients in Malawi forms an important aspect of the public health approach to scaling up access, but may have negative consequences for timely identification of treatment failure.

Our review has some limitations. First, establishing the precise date of policy enactment was challenging. Publication dates represent formal enactment, but key informants reported instances in which policies came into effect earlier. Certain policies did not reappear in more recent documents, casting doubt on their validity. Furthermore, countries that recently produced HIV guidelines (South Africa: 2013 ART guidelines; Kenya: 2012 PMTCT guidelines) may appear to have more 'advanced' policies than those currently in the process of updating their guidelines, including Malawi and the United Republic of Tanzania. Second, the extent to which all relevant policy indicators were captured is uncertain. Our systematic approach to develop tools and indicators attempted to minimize this, but there may be other factors that were missed. We did not investigate the broader national policy environment (Fig. 1). Factors such as national politics, laws and the criminal justice system, programme financing mechanisms and donor coordination have been shown to have strong influences on health seeking-behaviour and service response.9898.  Amon JJ. The political epidemiology of HIV.. J Int AIDS Soc 2014;17(1):19327. http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.1.19327PMID:25059653
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.1.19327...
101101.  Human rights and the law.; Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS 2012. Country-specific policy analyses will be needed to analyse these national influences in detail.

Interpreting these findings with regard to potential programme impact is challenging. In part this stems from the wide variation demonstrated in our analysis, but perhaps more importantly because policies are only the first step in programme delivery. Their effectiveness depends on service-level implementation, as well community-level factors.9999.  Baral S, Holland CE, Shannon K, Logie C, Semugoma P, Sithole B, et al. Enhancing benefits or increasing harms: community responses for HIV among men who have sex with men, transgender women, female sex workers, and people who inject drugs. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014 Aug 15;66 Suppl 3:S319-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000233PMID:25007203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000...
100100.  Seeley J, Watts CH, Kippax S, Russell S, Heise L, Whiteside A. Addressing the structural drivers of HIV: a luxury or necessity for programmes?. J Int AIDS Soc 2012;15(3) Suppl 1:1-4. PMID:22905346 Further analysis will examine how these different policies are implemented in ALPHA's network of health and demographic surveillance sites. This will allow us to assess whether policy translates into practice and whether practice exceeds stated policies, as often claimed by our key informants. International efforts to monitor policy implementation - such as WHO's estimates on ART policy implementation2424.  Global update on the health sector response to HIV, 2014.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2014. - are increasing and we hope that this review and its tools can support other efforts to track national policies.

Acknowledgements

We thank Masuma Mamdani, Sally Mtenga and Astha Ramaiya from the United Republic of Tanzania, Montserrat Fernandez from South Africa and Constance Nyamupaka and Simon Gregson from Zimbabwe.

References

  • 1.
    Global update on HIV treatment 2013: results, impact and opportunities. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
  • 2.
    Bor J, Herbst AJ, Newell ML, Bärnighausen T. Increases in adult life expectancy in rural South Africa: valuing the scale-up of HIV treatment. Science. 2013 Feb 22;339(6122):961-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1230413PMID:23430655
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1230413
  • 3.
    Chihana M, Floyd S, Molesworth A, Crampin AC, Kayuni N, Price A, et al. Adult mortality and probable cause of death in rural northern Malawi in the era of HIV treatment. Trop Med Int Health. 2012 Aug;17(8):e74-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.02929.xPMID:22943382
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.02929.x
  • 4.
    Floyd S, Marston M, Baisley K, Wringe A, Herbst K, Chihana M, et al. The effect of antiretroviral therapy provision on all-cause, AIDS and non-AIDS mortality at the population level-a comparative analysis of data from four settings in Southern and East Africa.. Trop Med Int Health 2012 Aug;17(8):e84-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.03032.xPMID:22943383
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.03032.x
  • 5.
    Jahn A, Floyd S, Crampin AC, Mwaungulu F, Mvula H, Munthali F, et al. Population-level effect of HIV on adult mortality and early evidence of reversal after introduction of antiretroviral therapy in Malawi. Lancet. 2008 May 10;371(9624):1603-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60693-5PMID:18468544
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60693-5
  • 6.
    Kasamba I, Baisley K, Mayanja BN, Maher D, Grosskurth H. The impact of antiretroviral treatment on mortality trends of HIV-positive adults in rural Uganda: a longitudinal population-based study, 1999-2009.. Trop Med Int Health 2012 Aug;17(8):e66-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.02841.xPMID:22943381
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2012.02841.x
  • 7.
    Mayanja BN, Baisley K, Nalweyiso N, Kibengo FM, Mugisha JO, Van der Paal L, et al. Using verbal autopsy to assess the prevalence of HIV infection among deaths in the ART period in rural Uganda: a prospective cohort study, 2006-2008. Popul Health Metr. 2011;9(1):36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-9-36PMID:21816100
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7954-9-36
  • 8.
    Slaymaker E, Todd J, Marston M, Calvert C, Michael D, Nakiyingi-Miiro J, et al. How have ART treatment programmes changed the patterns of excess mortality in people living with HIV? Estimates from four countries in East and Southern Africa. Glob Health Action. 2014;7(0):22789. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.22789PMID:24762982
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.22789
  • 9.
    UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic 2013. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; 2013.
  • 10.
    Kranzer K, Govindasamy D, Ford N, Johnston V, Lawn SD. Quantifying and addressing losses along the continuum of care for people living with HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. J Int AIDS Soc. 2012;15(2):17383. http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.15.2.17383PMID:23199799
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.15.2.17383
  • 11.
    Glynn JR, Calvert C, Price A, Chihana M, Kachiwanda L, Mboma S, et al. Measuring causes of adult mortality in rural northern Malawi over a decade of change. Glob Health Action. 2014;7(0):23621. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.23621PMID:24802384
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.23621
  • 12.
    Kanjala C, Michael D, Todd J, Slaymaker E, Calvert C, Isingo R, et al. Using HIV-attributable mortality to assess the impact of antiretroviral therapy on adult mortality in rural Tanzania.. Glob Health Action 2014;7(0):21865. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.21865PMID:24656167
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.21865
  • 13.
    Maher D, Biraro S, Hosegood V, Isingo R, Lutalo T, Mushati P, et al.; Collaborators in ALPHA Network. Translating global health research aims into action: the example of the ALPHA network.. Trop Med Int Health 2010 Mar;15(3):321-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02456.xPMID:20070637
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02456.x
  • 14.
    Masiira B, Baisley K, Mayanja BN, Kazooba P, Maher D, Kaleebu P. Mortality and its predictors among antiretroviral therapy naïve HIV-infected individuals with CD4 cell count 350 cells/mm(3) compared to the general population: data from a population-based prospective HIV cohort in Uganda.. Glob Health Action 2014;7(0):21843. http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.21843PMID:24433941
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.21843
  • 15.
    The gap report.; Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS 2014.
  • 16.
    Cherutich P, Kaiser R, Galbraith J, Williamson J, Shiraishi RW, Ngare C, et al.; KAIS Study Group. Lack of knowledge of HIV status a major barrier to HIV prevention, care and treatment efforts in Kenya: results from a nationally representative study. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(5):e36797. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036797PMID:22574226
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036797
  • 17.
    Kenya AIDS indicator survey 2012 preliminary report. Nairobi: National AIDS and STI Control Programme, Ministry of Health Kenya; 2013.
  • 18.
    2012 global AIDS response progress report: Malawi country report for 2010 and 2011. Lilongwe: Malawi Government; 2012.
  • 19.
    South African national HIV prevalence, incidence and behaviour survey, 2012. Cape Town: Human Sciences Research Council; 2014.
  • 20.
    2011 Uganda AIDS indicator survey: key findings. Calverton: Uganda Ministry of Health and ICF International; 2012.
  • 21.
    HIV/AIDS and malaria indicator survey 2011-12. Dar es Salaam: Tanzania Commission for AIDS, Zanzibar AIDS Commission, National Bureau of Statistics, Office of the Chief Government Statistician and ICF International; 2013.
  • 22.
    Zimbabwe demographic and health survey 2010-2011. Calverton: Zimbabwe National Statistics Agency and ICF International; 2012.
  • 23.
    World health statistics 2013.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2013.
  • 24.
    Global update on the health sector response to HIV, 2014.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2014.
  • 25.
    A public health approach for scaling up antiretroviral treatment: a toolkit for program managers.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2003.
  • 26.
    Presidential declaration. Nairobi, Kenya. Nairobi: Executive Office of the President; 2006.
  • 27.
    HCT scale-up plan 2004-2005: The 2 year plan to scale up counselling and HIV testing services in Malawi. Lilongwe: Malawi Ministry of Health; 2004.
  • 28.
    Country progress report on the declaration of commitment on HIV/AIDS. Pretoria: South Africa Department of Health; 2010.
  • 29.
    Uganda national policy guidelines for HIV counseling and testing. Kampala. Kampala: Uganda Ministry of Health; 2005.
  • 30.
    National guidelines for voluntary counseling and testing. Dar es Salaam: Tanzanian National AIDS Control Program; 2005.
  • 31.
    Review of hospital fees and charges. Harare: Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Welfare; 2007.
  • 32.
    Rapid HIV tests: guidelines for use in HIV testing and counselling services in resource-constrained settings.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2004.
  • 33.
    Guidelines for HIV testing and counselling, Kenya. Nairobi: National AIDS and STI Control Programme; 2008.
  • 34.
    The 5-year plan to scale up HCT services in Malawi 2006-2010.; Lilongwe: Malawi Ministry of Health 2006.
  • 35.
    HIV counselling and testing (HCT) policy guidelines.; Pretoria: South Africa Department of Health 2010.
  • 36.
    Uganda HIV counselling and testing policy. Kampala: Uganda Ministry of Health; 2010.
  • 37.
    Guidelines for HIV testing and counseling in clinical settings.; Dar es Salaam: Tanzanian National AIDS Control Program 2007.
  • 38.
    Zimbabwe national guidelines on HIV testing and counselling.; Harare: Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Welfare 2005.
  • 39.
    National HIV testing and counselling training course for health workers.; Harare: Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Welfare 2007.
  • 40.
    National guidelines for HIV/STI programs for sex workers. Nairobi: Kenya Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation; 2010.
  • 41.
    Guidance on provider-initiated HIV testing and counselling in health facilities.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2007.
  • 42.
    Guidelines for HCT. 3rd ed.; Lilongwe: Malawi Ministry of Health 2009.
  • 43.
    Children's Act 38, Section 130. South Africa; 2005.
  • 44.
    Operational manual for community-based HIV testing and counselling. Nairobi: Kenya National AIDS and STI Control Programme (Kenya); 2011.
  • 45.
    National quality management guidance framework for HIV testing and counseling. Nairobi: Kenya National AIDS and STI Control Programme; 2010.
  • 46.
    Patient monitoring guidelines for HIV care and antiretroviral therapy (ART).; Geneva: World Health Organization 2006.
  • 47.
    Operational manual for implementing provider-initiated HIV testing and counseling in clinical settings.; Nairobi: Kenya National AIDS and STI Control Programme 2010.
  • 48.
    Repeat and re-testing guidance.; Nairobi: Kenya National AIDS and STI Control Programme 2010.
  • 49.
    Delivering HIV test results and messages for re-testing and counselling in adults.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2010.
  • 50.
    National recommendations for PMTCT of HIV, IYCF and ART for children, adults & adolescents. Nairobi: Kenya Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation & Medics Management Services; 2010.
  • 51.
    Prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV and paediatric HIV care guidelines.; Lilongwe: Malawi Ministry of Health 2010.
  • 52.
    Clinical guidelines: PMTCT (Prevention of mother to child transmission).; Pretoria: South Africa Department of Health 2010.
  • 53.
    The integrated national guidelines on antiretroviral therapy, prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV and infant & young child feeding. 1st ed.; Kampala: Uganda Ministry of Health 2011.
  • 54.
    The right to know: new approaches to HIV testing and counselling.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2003.
  • 55.
    Scaling-up HIV testing and counselling services: a toolkit for programme managers.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2003.
  • 56.
    National antiretroviral treatment and care guidelines for adults and children. 1st ed.; Kampala: Uganda Ministry of Health 2003.
  • 57.
    Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act; 1996.
  • 58.
    Uganda antiretroviral treatment policy. 2nd ed.; Kampala: Uganda Ministry of Health 2011.
  • 59.
    National health policy. Dar es Salaam: United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Health and Social Welfare; 2007.
  • 60.
    Guidelines for antiretroviral therapy in Kenya.; Nairobi: Kenya National AIDS and STI Control Programme 2011.
  • 61.
    Guidelines for the use of ART in Malawi. 2nd ed.; Lilongwe: Malawi Ministry of Health 2006.
  • 62.
    The South Africa antiretroviral treatment guidelines.; Pretoria: South Africa Department of Health 2010.
  • 63.
    Antiretroviral drugs for treating pregnant women and preventing HIV Infection in infants.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2010.
  • 64.
    Guidelines for PMTCT of HIV/AIDS in Kenya.; Nairobi: Kenya National AIDS and STI Control Programme 2012.
  • 65.
    National guidelines for comprehensive care of prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. 3rd ed. Dar es Salaam: Tanzanian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare; 2012.
  • 66.
    Essential medicines list and standard treatment guidelines for Zimbabwe. 6th ed.; Harare: Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Welfare 2011.
  • 67.
    National ART guidelines.; Nairobi: Kenya National AIDS and STI Control Programme 2005.
  • 68.
    Guidelines for the use of ART in Malawi. 3rd ed.; Lilongwe: Malawi Ministry of Health 2010.
  • 69.
    National guidelines for the clinical management of HIV and AIDS. 2nd ed.; Dar es Salaam: Tanzanian National AIDS Control Program 2005.
  • 70.
    Guidelines for antiretroviral therapy in Zimbabwe.; Harare: Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Welfare 2010.
  • 71.
    National guidelines for home based care services.; Dar es Salaam: Tanzanian National AIDS Control Program 2010.
  • 72.
    Antiretroviral drugs for treating pregnant women and preventing HIV infection in infants: towards universal access.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2006.
  • 73.
    Clinical management of HIV in children and adults: Malawi integrated guidelines.; Lilongwe: Malawi Ministry of Health 2011.
  • 74.
    Policy for reduction of the mother-to-child HIV transmission in Uganda.; Kampala: Uganda Ministry of Health 2003.
  • 75.
    National antiretroviral treatment and care guidelines for adults, adolescents, and children. 3rd ed.; Kampala: Uganda Ministry of Health 2009.
  • 76.
    National guidelines for the clinical management of HIV and AIDS. 3rd ed.; Dar es Salaam: Tanzanian National AIDS Control Program 2009.
  • 77.
    HIV and AIDS treatment and care programme documents and tools in Zimbabwe.; Harare: Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Welfare 2010.
  • 78.
    Program update: use of antiretroviral drugs for treating pregnant women and preventing HIV infection in infants.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2012.
  • 79.
    Rapid advice: antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in adults and adolescents.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2009.
  • 80.
    Kenya national clinical manual for ART providers.; Nairobi: Kenya National AIDS and STI Control Programme 2007.
  • 81.
    Guidelines for the use of ART in Malawi. 1st ed.; Lilongwe: Malawi Ministry of Health 2003.
  • 82.
    The South Africa antiretroviral treatment guidelines.; Pretoria: South Africa Department of Health 2013.
  • 83.
    National guidelines for the clinical management of HIV and AIDS. 4th ed.; Dar es Salaam: Tanzanian National AIDS Control Program 2012.
  • 84.
    Consolidated guidelines on the use of antiretroviral drugs for treating and preventing HIV infection.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2013.
  • 85.
    Task shifting: global recommendations and guidelines.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2008.
  • 86.
    Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in adults and adolescents: recommendations for a public health approach.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2010.
  • 87.
    HIV/AIDS decentralization guidelines.; Nairobi: Kenya Ministry of Public Health and Sanitation 2009.
  • 88.
    National antiretroviral treatment and care guidelines for adults, adolescents, and children. 2nd ed.; Kampala: Uganda Ministry of Health 2008.
  • 89.
    Integrated management of adult and adolescent illness guidelines.; Harare: Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Welfare 2006.
  • 90.
    National community and home based care guidelines.; Harare: Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Welfare 2009.
  • 91.
    Harmonized indicator manual for the HIV program.; Nairobi: Kenya National AIDS and STI Control Programme 2010.
  • 92.
    Chronic HIV care pre-ART register.; Harare: Zimbabwe Ministry of Health and Child Welfare 2012.
  • 93.
    Guidelines for intensified tuberculosis case-finding and isoniazid preventive therapy for people living with HIV in resource-constrained settings.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2011.
  • 94.
    National policy guidelines for TB/HIV collaborative activities in Uganda.; Kampala: Uganda Ministry of Health 2006.
  • 95.
    Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in adults and adolescents: recommendations for a public health approach.; Geneva: World Health Organization 2006.
  • 96.
    Home based care policy guidelines for HIV/AIDS.; Kampala: Uganda Ministry of Health 2009.
  • 97.
    Chang CC, Crane M, Zhou J, Mina M, Post JJ, Cameron BA, et al. HIV and co-infections. Immunol Rev. 2013 Jul;254(1):114-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imr.12063PMID:23772618
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/imr.12063
  • 98.
    Amon JJ. The political epidemiology of HIV.. J Int AIDS Soc 2014;17(1):19327. http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.1.19327PMID:25059653
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.1.19327
  • 99.
    Baral S, Holland CE, Shannon K, Logie C, Semugoma P, Sithole B, et al. Enhancing benefits or increasing harms: community responses for HIV among men who have sex with men, transgender women, female sex workers, and people who inject drugs. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2014 Aug 15;66 Suppl 3:S319-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000233PMID:25007203
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000233
  • 100.
    Seeley J, Watts CH, Kippax S, Russell S, Heise L, Whiteside A. Addressing the structural drivers of HIV: a luxury or necessity for programmes?. J Int AIDS Soc 2012;15(3) Suppl 1:1-4. PMID:22905346
  • 101.
    Human rights and the law.; Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS 2012.

  • Funding: This research was funded by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Salaries of some individual authors are sponsored by institutional grants from: The Wellcome Trust, the Medical Research Council (United Kingdom) and the National Institutes of Health (United States of America).

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    July 2015

History

  • Received
    11 Sept 2014
  • Reviewed
    16 Dec 2014
  • Accepted
    23 Jan 2015
Creative Common - by 3.0 igo
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article's original URL.
World Health Organization Genebra - Genebra - Switzerland
E-mail: bulletin@who.int