About the journal

Basic information


The journal Saúde em Debate, created in 1976, is a publication by Centro Brasileiro de Estudos em Saúde (CEBES) which is directed to the public policies of the health field. Published quarterly, that is, in March, June, September and December.

Its abbreviated title is Saúde debate, which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.



Indexed in

  • Literatura Latino-americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde - LILACS
  • Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal - Latindex
  • História da Saúde Pública na America Latina e Caribe - HISA
  • Sumários de Revistas Brasileiras - Sumários
  • Índice de Revistas Latinoamericano em Ciencias - Periódica


Intellectual Property


All content of the journal, except where identified, is licensed under a Creative Commons attribution-type CC-BY.

That license permits copying and redistributing the material in any support or format. It is also permitted that the material be adapted through remixing, transformation, and/or creation, for any purpose.



Open access policy


This journal offers immediate open access to its content, following the principle that making scientific knowledge freely available to the public provides greater world-wide democratization of that knowledge.





The journal does no charge any fees for submitting and publishing articles. It is up to the authors, however, to bear the costs of language revisions and proofreading for their articles. After the approval of the article, proofreaders are indicated so that the authors contact them and take responsibility for such work. At the end, a declaration signed by the proofreaders must be forwarded to the journal, verifying the language revision performed on the article.





The journal receives financial support from:

  • Fundação Oswaldo Cruz - FIOCRUZ


Editorial Board

Chief Editor

  • Maria Lucia Frizon Rizzotto – Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná (Unioeste), Cascavel (PR), Brasil.


Associate Editors

  • Amélia Cohn – Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo (SP), Brasil
  • Ana Maria Costa – Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde (ESCS), Brasília (DF), Brasil
  • Greice Maria de Souza Menezes – Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA), Salvador (BA), Brasil
  • Heleno Rodrigues Corrêa Filho – Universidade Estadual de Campinas  (Unicamp), Campinas (SP), Brasil
  • Lenaura de Vasconcelos Costa Lobato – Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niterói (RJ), Brasil
  • Paulo Duarte de Carvalho Amarante – Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil


Publishing Council

  • Alicia Stolkiner – Universidade de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Angel Martinez Hernaez – Universidad Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Espanha
  • Breno Augusto Souto Maior Fonte – Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife (PE), Brasil
  • Carlos Botazzo – Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo (SP), Brasil
  • Catalina Eibenschutz – Universidade Autónoma Metropolitana, Xochimilco, México
  • Cornelis Johannes van Stralen – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasil
  • Diana Mauri – Universidade de Milão, Milão, Itália
  • Eduardo Luis Menéndez Spina – Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropologia Social, Mexico (DF), México
  • Elias Kondilis - Queen Mary University of London, Londres, Inglaterra
  • Eduardo Maia Freese de Carvalho – Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Recife (PE), Brasil
  • Hugo Spinelli – Universidad Nacional de Lanús, Lanús, Argentina
  • Jean Pierre Unger – Institut de Médicine Tropicale, Antuérpia, Bélgica
  • José Carlos Braga – Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas (SP), Brasil
  • José da Rocha Carvalheiro – Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil
  • Luiz Augusto Facchini – Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas (RS), Brasil
  • Luiz Odorico Monteiro de Andrade – Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza (CE), Brasil
  • Maria Salete Bessa Jorge – Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza (CE), Brasil
  • Paulo Marchiori Buss – Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil
  • Paulo de Tarso Ribeiro de Oliveira – Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém (PA), Brasil
  • Rubens de Camargo Ferreira Adorno – Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo (SP), Brasil
  • Sonia Maria Fleury Teixeira – Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil
  • Sulamis Dain – Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brasil
  • Walter Ferreira de Oliveira – Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis (SC), Brasil


Executive Editor

  • Mariana Chastinet


Editorial Secretary and Normalization

  • Lucas Rocha
  • Luiza Nunes


Instructions to authors

Scope and Policy


The journal ‘Saúde em Debate’ (Health in Debate), created in 1976, is published by Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saúde (Cebes) (Brazilian Center for Health Studies), that aims to disseminate studies, researches and reflections that contribute to the debate in the collective health field, especially those related to issues regarding policy, planning, management and assessment in health. The editors encourage contributions from different theoretical and methodological perspectives and from various scientific disciplines.

The journal is published on a quarterly basis; the Editors may decide on publishing special issues, which will follow the same submission and assessment process as the regular issues.

‘Saúde em Debate’ accepts unpublished and original works that bring relevant contribution to scientific knowledge in the health field.

Authors are entirely and exclusively responsible for the submitted manuscripts, which must not be simultaneously submitted to another journal, be it integrally or partially. It is Cebes’ policy to own the copyright of all articles published in the journal.

The journal is made freely available, online and open access; thus, any person may freely read, download and disseminate the texts for educational and academic purposes, provided that the author(s) and original source are properly cited.

No fees are charged from the authors for the submission and evaluation of articles; nevertheless, once the article has been approved for publication, the authors are responsible for the language proofreading (obligatory) and the translation into English, based on a list of proofreaders and translators provided by the journal.



Guidelines for te preparation and submission of articles


Articles should be submitted exclusively on the website: www.saudeemdebate.org.br. After registering, the author responsible for the submission will receive a login name and a password.

When submitting the article, all information required must be supplied with identical content as in the uploaded file.

Types of texts accepted for submission

  1. Original article: scientific research outcome that may be generalized or replicated. The text should comprise between 10 and 15 pages.
  2. Essay: critical analysis on a specific theme relevant and of interest to Brazilian and international topical health policies. The text should comprise between 10 and 15 pages.
  3. Systematic review: critical review of literature on topical theme, aiming at answering a relevant question on public health, informing details of the methodology used. The text should comprise between 10 and 15 pages.
  4. Opinion article: exclusively for authors invited by the Editorial Board. No abstract or summary are required. The text should comprise between 10 and 15 pages.
  5. Experience report: description of academic, assistential or extension experiences that bring significant contributions to the area. The text should comprise between 10 and 12 pages.
  6. Book review: review of books on subjects of interest to the field of public health policies, by decision of the Editorial Board. Texts should present an overview of the work, its theoretical framework and target audience. The text should comprise up to 3 pages.
  7. Document and testimony: works referring to themes of historical or topical interest, by decision of the Editorial Board.

For all cases, the maximum number of pages does not include the title page and references.

Text preparation
The text may be written in Portuguese, Spanish or English.

It should be typed in Microsoft® Word or compatible software, in doc or docx format.

Page size standard A4 (210X297mm); all four margins 2.5cm wide; font Times New Roman in 12pt size; line spacing 1.5.

The text must not contain any information that identifies the author(s) or related institution(s).

Footnotes should not be used in the text. If absolutely necessary, footnotes should be indicated with sequential superscript numbers.

Repetition of data or information in the different parts of the text should be avoided.

Subjects’ testimonies should be italicized and between inverted commas, placed within the text when not exceeding three lines. When longer than three lines, they should have a 4cm indentation, simple line spacing and font in 12pt size.
Highlighted words or text excerpts should be placed between simple inverted commas. Example: ‘entrance door’. Capital letters and bold font should be avoided.

Figures, graphs, charts and tables should be supplied in high resolution, in black-and-white or in gray scale, and on separate sheets, one on each sheet, following the order in which they appear in the text (they should be numbered and comprise title and source). Their position should be clearly indicated on the page where they are inserted. The quantity of figures, graphs, charts and tables should not exceed five per text.

In case there are photographs, subjects must not be identified, unless they authorize it, in writing, for the purpose of scientific dissemination.

The file should be editable.

The complete work, corresponding to the file to be uploaded, should comprise:

  1. Title page comprising:
  2. Title expressing clearly and briefly the contents of the text, in no more than 15 words. The title should be in bold font, using capital letters only for proper nouns. Texts written in Portuguese and Spanish should have the title in the original idiom and in English. The text in English should have the title in English and in Portuguese.
  3. Full author(s) name(s) aligned on the right (maximum of five authors per article). On footnote(s), place information on institutional affiliation and e-mail. For the contact author add address and telephone number.
  4. In case the research has been funded, inform the funding agency and the number of the process.
  5. Conflict of interest. The works submitted for publication must comprise information on the existence of any type of conflict of interest. Financial conflict of interest, for example, is related not only to the direct research funding, but also to employment link. In case there is no conflict, it will suffice to place on the title page the statement “I declare that there has been no conflict of interest regarding the conception of this work”.
  6. Abstract in Portuguese and English or in Spanish and English, comprising no more than 700 characters including spaces, clearly outlining the aims, the method used and the main conclusions of the work. No citations or abbreviations should be used, except for internationally recognized abbreviations.
  7. At the end of the abstract, three to five keywords should be included, separated by semicolon (only the first letter in capital), using terms from the structured vocabulary (DeCS) available at www.decs.bvs.br.

Clinical trial registration
‘Saúde em Debate’ journal supports the policies for clinical trial registration of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), thus recognizing its importance to the registry and international dissemination of information on clinical trial. Thus, clinical researches should contain the identification number on one of the Clinical Trials registries validated by WHO and ICMJE, whose addresses are available at http://www.icmje.org. Whenever a trial registration number is available, authors should list it at the end of the abstract.

  1. Text. The journal respects the authors’ style and creativity regarding the text composition; nevertheless, the text must contemplate conventional elements, such as:
  2. Introduction with clear definition of the investigated problem and its rationale;
  3. Methods objectively described;
  4. Outcomes and discussion may be presented together or separately;
  5. Conclusion.
  6. Contributors. Individual contributions of each author should be specified at the end of the text. According to the authorship criteria developed by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, authorship should be based on the following conditions: a) substantial contribution to the conception and the design of the work, or to the analysis and interpretation of data for the work; b) substantial contribution to drafting the work or critically revising the contents; and c) participation at the final approval of the version to be published.
  7. Acknowledgments. Optional.
  8. References. Should not exceed 25 references, except in the case of the systematic review type of article. Only authors cited in the text should be listed and it should follow the norm NBR 6023 of the Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT) (Brazilian Association of Technical Norms).

Citation examples
All citations made in the text should be listed in the references presented at the end of the article, using the ABNT norm NBR 10520.

Direct citation with up to three lines
The focal group is a “research technique that uses the group sessions as one of the facilitator forums of psycho-sociologic and cultural characteristics expression” (WESTPHAL; BÓGUS; FARIA, 1996, p. 473).

Direct citation with more than three lines
The 8.080 Act, known as Health Organic Act, initiated a regulation process for the operation of a public model of health actions and services, ordinated by the Unified Health System:

Guided by a set of principles and guidelines valid for the entire national territory, it is based on a wide conception of the right to health and the role of the State on granting this right, incorporating, within its institutional and decision-making structure, spaces and instruments for the democratization and sharing of the health system management. (NORONHA; MACHADO; LIMA, 2011, p. 435).

Indirect citation
According to Foucault (2008), neoliberalism appears as a governmental model in post-Nazi Germany, in a radicalization of liberalism aiming at the recovery of the German state based on a new state-market relationship.

Reference Examples

FLEURY, S.; LOBATO, L. V. C. (Org.). Seguridade social, cidadania e saúde. Rio de Janeiro: Cebes, 2009.

Book chapter:
FLEURY, S. Socialismo e democracia: o lugar do sujeito. In: FLEURY, S.; LOBATO, L. V. C. (Org.). Participação, democracia e saúde. Rio de Janeiro: Cebes, 2009. p. 24-46.

Journal article:
ALMEIDA-FILHO, N. A. Problemática teórica da determinação social da saúde (nota breve sobre desigualdades em saúde como objeto de conhecimento). Saúde em Debate, Rio de Janeiro, v. 33, n. 83, p. 349-370, set./dez. 2010.

Internet material:
CENTRO BRASILEIRO DE ESTUDOS DE SAÚDE. Revista Saúde em Debate. Available at: <http://cebes.org.br/publicacao-tipo/revista-saude-em-debate/>. Access on: 31 jan. 2016.

Note: Author’s middle name and surname should always be abbreviated.



Assessment process


Every manuscript received by ‘Saúde em Debate’ is submitted to prior analysis. Works that are not in accordance to the journal publishing norms shall be returned to the authors for adequacy and new submission. Once the journal’s standards have been entirely met, manuscripts will be appraised by the Editorial Board, composed of the editor-in-chief and associate editors, for originality, scope, topicality, and compliance with the journal’s editorial policy. Articles recommended by the Board shall be forwarded for assessment to at least two reviewers, who will be indicated according to the theme of the work and to their expertise, and who will provide their approval, refusal, and/or make recommendations to the authors.

‘Saúde em Debate’ uses the double-blind review method, which means that the names of both the authors and the reviewers are concealed from one another during the entire assessment process. In case there is divergence between the reviewers, the article will be sent to a third reviewer. Likewise, the Editorial Board may also produce a third review. The reviewers’ responsibility is to recommend the acceptance, the refusal, or the reformulation of the works. In case there is a reformulation request, the authors shall return the revised work until the stipulated date. In case this does not happen, the work shall be excluded from the system.

The editorial Board has full authority to decide on the final acceptance of the work, as well as on the changes made.

No additions or changes will be accepted after the final approval of the work. In case the journal’s Editorial Board has any suggestions regarding changes on the structure or contents of the work, these shall be previously agreed upon with the authors by means of e-mail communication.

The typeset article proof will be sent by e-mail to the corresponding author; it must be carefully checked and returned until the stipulated date.

Note: before being sent to peer review, articles submitted to the journal ‘Saúde em Debate undergo a plagiarism detector software Plagiarisma. Thus, it is possible that the authors, who must guarantee the originality of the manuscripts and reference all research sources used, are questioned about information identified by the detection tool. Plagiarism is an unacceptable editorial behavior, that way, if proven its existence, the authors involved will no longer be able to submit new articles to the journal.


The documents listed below must be digitalized and sent to the e-mail address revista@saudeemdebate.org.br.

1) Assignment of copyright and Statement of authorship and responsibility
All the authors and co-authors must fill in and sign the statements following the models available at: http://www.saudeemdebate.org.br/artigos/index.php.

2) Approval statement by the Research Ethics Committee (CEP)
In the case of researches involving human beings, in compliance with Resolution 466, of 12th December 2012, from the National Health Council (CNS), the research approval statement of the Research Ethics Committee from the institution where the work has been carried out must be forwarded. In case the institution does not have a Research Ethics Committee, the document issued by the CEP where the research has been approved must be forwarded.

3) Statement of spelling and grammar proofreading
Upon acceptance, articles must be proofread by a qualified professional to be chosen from a list provided by the journal. After proofreading, the article shall be returned together with a statement from the proofreader.

4) Statement of translation
The articles accepted may be translated into English on the authors’ responsibility. In this case, the translation shall be carried out by a qualified professional to be chosen from a list provided by the journal. The translated article shall be returned together with a statement from the translator.

NOTE: Cebes editorial production is a result of collective work and of institutional and individual support. Authors’ contribution for the continuity of ‘Saúde em Debate’ journal as a democratic space for the dissemination of critical knowledge in the health field shall be made by means of association to Cebes. In order to become an associate, please access http://www.cebes.org.br.

Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saúde RJ - Brazil
E-mail: revista@saudeemdebate.org.br